Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:chen@mac.com: 990 ]

Total 990 documents matching your query.

201. [RTTY] FT1000MP is FSK. (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 14:59:01 -0700
My mistake for saying the FT1000MP is not direct FSK -- it is. Thanks to Ian, G3SEK for pointing it out to me. I just got back to the home QTH so I could check the schematics. The FSK keying signal o
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00330.html (7,753 bytes)

202. Re: [RTTY] More on RTTY Frequency (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 11:42:11 -0700
On Aug 29, 2004, at 8:16 AM, Dick Kriss, AA5VU wrote: He came back saying he was reading 14085.3. I thanked him for sharing and after the QSO I noted my Kenwood TS-570D(G) was displaying 14089.33. Hi
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00356.html (8,470 bytes)

203. Re: [RTTY] W0ETC SCC RTTY Championship (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 11:53:35 -0700
On Aug 29, 2004, at 10:09 AM, Jerry Flanders wrote: That said, I noticed that some of the guys with recent-style calls were obviously reporting their original license issue year, not the current call
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00358.html (8,074 bytes)

204. Re: [RTTY] Re: RITTY (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 21:58:45 -0700
On Aug 29, 2004, at 9:49 PM, K. Krallis wrote: Ed, I could possibly upload it to my web page so that other can download it later. I would recommend asking the Copyright holder first? 73 Chen, W7AY __
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-08/msg00372.html (6,663 bytes)

205. Re: [RTTY] Taking a break from RTTY contesting (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 18:08:05 -0700
On Sep 20, 2004, at 5:59 PM, Barry wrote: While I haven't been very active on RTTY the last few years, other than operating CQWW and the Sprint, I just thought I'd mention that I won't be on for the
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00128.html (7,151 bytes)

206. Re: [RTTY] Just Looking (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 16:12:22 -0700
On Sep 23, 2004, at 3:57 PM, roofus wrote: Where would I look for RTTY stations on 10 meters? Folks usually hang around 28070 thru 28100, and spilling above that all the way to 28120 when there is a
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00170.html (6,766 bytes)

207. Re: [RTTY] Operating practices in CQWW (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 12:18:21 -0700
On Sep 27, 2004, at 10:57 AM, roofus wrote: Phil could you please explain your use of 3 X 3, 2 X 3, 1 X 2, and 1 X 3 calls? I just applied for a 2 X 1 call and hope that it's not a problem. I think P
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00257.html (9,798 bytes)

208. Re: [RTTY] Re: Operating practices in CQWW (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 14:47:57 -0700
On Sep 27, 2004, at 2:30 PM, Ekki Plicht wrote: It's less the slowdown by transmission but the slowdown by hunting the call on screen with the mouse, because the screen is full and scrolls up with th
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00270.html (9,071 bytes)

209. [RTTY] Re: external DSP audio filters (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 11:47:03 -0700
On Oct 2, 2004, at 5:54 AM, Ian White, G3SEK wrote: Or do the outboard DSP boxes really perform so much better than the DSP options in the radios and in MMTTY? IMHO, they don't. It depends on the har
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00035.html (11,501 bytes)

210. [RTTY] Re: external DSP audio filters (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 12:20:25 -0700
On Oct 2, 2004, at 10:25 AM, Bill Turner wrote: How does this work on those occasional stations using 200 Hz (or more) shift? Seems too narrow to include the sidebands if the skirts are really steep.
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00039.html (9,963 bytes)

211. Re: [RTTY] Who's Name (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 12:44:41 -0700
On Oct 2, 2004, at 11:51 AM, roofus wrote: Well it's been 24 hours since my last dumb question so here we go. In a contest where you give your name like the SPRINT does it have to be the name on your
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00041.html (8,292 bytes)

212. Re: [RTTY] Who's Name (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 12:54:37 -0700
On Oct 2, 2004, at 12:01 PM, KH6DV@cs.com wrote: Every naqp I work Mork, a well know contester in Northern California and a member of the NCCC. By the way his name isn't Mork. It is really close to h
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00043.html (7,328 bytes)

213. Re: [RTTY] My birthday 17. okt. and JARTS (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 15:03:29 -0700
On Oct 4, 2004, at 2:24 PM, Torben Kahr wrote: Wich exchange do I have to use in the JARTS contest - I am born the 17. okt. 1945. Since the contest managers don't know when you were born, you can eve
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00060.html (7,429 bytes)

214. Re: [RTTY] TX9 -Reversed I'm confused (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 09:41:46 -0700
On Oct 15, 2004, at 8:55 AM, Art Searle W2NRA wrote: He's not listening upside-down! He's just sending upside-down and that's no big deal, right?. Just transmit right side up! Ok I'm a RTTY Rookie an
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00153.html (9,098 bytes)

215. Re: [RTTY] DESREVER (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 01:24:07 -0700
On Oct 15, 2004, at 5:12 PM, James wrote: Reversed Signal. I am confused. My RTTY Elmer some 34 years ago Said that the "standard" was LSB on all bands. The only Amateur standard I know of is the one
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00165.html (7,554 bytes)

216. Re: [RTTY] DESREVER (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 10:31:56 -0700
On Oct 16, 2004, at 6:20 AM, Richard Ferch wrote: In particular, I believe recent Kenwood and Yaesu radios assume the opposite polarity to the one assumed by JE3HHT in MMTTY, so on these radios you h
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00171.html (9,265 bytes)

217. Re: [RTTY] VE7CF JARTS SOAB High (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 22:42:35 -0700
On Oct 17, 2004, at 9:33 PM, Jack Wiebe wrote: Sounded like a fun contest. Wish I'd had more time for it. Didn't have a buffer ready for W4UK's "Hi old timer" comment, but sure got a chuckle out of i
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00192.html (6,900 bytes)

218. Re: [RTTY] pet peeve (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 06:52:29 -0700
On Oct 18, 2004, at 5:24 AM, Jerry Pixton wrote: My pet gripe is still those stations calling CQ. You call them. They call you. You call them. They call you. Finally out of frustration you send a rep
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00198.html (7,502 bytes)

219. Re: [RTTY] Pet Peeve # 2 (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 06:57:29 -0700
On Oct 18, 2004, at 6:38 AM, W0YR@aol.com wrote: I've experienced the same thing -- answering CQers and they disappear. I think it's due either to QSB or someone we can't hear who's moved in near to
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00199.html (7,597 bytes)

220. Re: [RTTY] my goal in rtty (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 17:42:59 -0700
I'll bet that we will not still be using 45 baud 170 Hz-shift FSK in the year 2055. You could send that exchange to me using spread spectrum, Bill. Also, neither of us will be using a keyboard, the
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00252.html (7,311 bytes)

Current List: 201 - 220
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu