Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dezrat@copper.net: 581 ]

Total 581 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 03:55:56 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Traditional wisdom says the best bang for the buck is to spend it on the antenna. Assuming you have already done that, next would b
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00287.html (7,569 bytes)

2. [RTTY] DIN stands for....? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 16:16:40 -0800
Earlier today I was wiring up the 8-pin DIN plug for my new IC-756PRO III which is in the mail. I have a copy of the manual so I thought I'd get started on the accessory plug wiring. My first thought
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00294.html (9,102 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] DIN stands for....? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 16:37:50 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Thank you. Now I know where to send that "special" package. Just kidding! Relax!!! I would never do that, probably. 73, Bill W6WRT
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00297.html (7,753 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] DIN stands for....? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 19:34:35 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Hmmmmm. Are any of them single? 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.co
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00304.html (8,292 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] DIN stands for....? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 19:29:04 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ What is it with these Europeans? Don't they like us? :-) 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailin
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00305.html (8,279 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] [BULK] - DIN stands for....? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 22:58:57 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Molex works for me too with one teeny exception for homebrewers. All of them I've seen need a square or rectangular mounting hole,
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00306.html (7,242 bytes)

7. Re: [RTTY] DIN stands for....? (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Turner" <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 14:09:22 -0800
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Home Depot sells a tool called a "drill" which works even faster and will create a nice round hole in the first place! Seriously, thanks for the input George.
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00321.html (8,090 bytes)

8. Re: [RTTY] DIN stands for....? (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Turner" <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 14:33:43 -0800
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Yes, you are. But then, you also prefer the Mac over the PC. :-) Seriously though, I wouldn't mind the DIN if they used some common sense in numbering the pin
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00322.html (9,589 bytes)

9. Re: [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Turner" <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 18:02:04 -0800
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Or '870s. I've owned both and the '870 has much better IF bandpass shape due to the digital filter. 73, Bill W6WRT ___________________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00325.html (7,287 bytes)

10. Re: [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Turner" <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 20:13:53 -0800
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Of all the ones I've used, I like the IC-746PRO the best. It has a RTTY filter mode which provides a twin peak filter, 300 Hz bandwidth and amplitude limiting
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00328.html (8,341 bytes)

11. Re: [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Turner" <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 20:21:06 -0800
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Microphone? I thought those went out with CW. :-) 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00330.html (7,647 bytes)

12. Re: [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Turner" <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 22:25:31 -0800
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Yes, either 250 or 300 will do fine. 500 will do in a pinch (stranded on a desert island) but you wouldn't be happy with it in a contest. Ragchewing or DXing,
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00332.html (8,149 bytes)

13. Re: [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Turner" <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 04:01:43 -0800
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ More DX is found between 14080 and 14090 than all the other bands put together. Spend most of your listening time there, but when there is a major DXpedition
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00335.html (9,817 bytes)

14. Re: [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Turner" <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 09:39:41 -0800
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I need to get a beam for 17 meters. Can anyone recommend a decent three-element? Perhaps one combined with 12 meters? 73, Bill W6WRT _________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00352.html (8,343 bytes)

15. Re: [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Turner" <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 10:28:59 -0800
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Impressive! I have new respect for my 17 meter dipole. :-) 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.co
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00355.html (8,615 bytes)

16. Re: [RTTY] K4WW (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Turner" <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 10:58:14 -0800
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Me too. I figure the SO2R boys are in for the full contest period so working them can come later, as opposed to the casual ops. Actually, I rarely ever call t
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00359.html (7,356 bytes)

17. [RTTY] W6WRT score summary (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Turner" <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 11:06:33 -0800
FEB 2006 North American QSO Party, RTTY Call: W6WRT Operator(s): W6WRT Station: W6WRT Class: Single Op LP QTH: USA Operating Time (hrs): 8.5 Mode: S01R Software: N1MM Logger v6.2.6 Summary: Band QSOs
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00360.html (7,067 bytes)

18. Re: [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Turner" <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 11:31:23 -0800
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you are using a narrow bandwidth - 250 Hz or so - you will be right on top of the other station anyway. If you are, then NET/AFC will only correct a few Hz
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00363.html (8,600 bytes)

19. Re: [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Turner" <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 11:44:47 -0800
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I have no idea for the IC-746PRO, but it must be the right one because I have never heard the "pumping" so common to poorly designed AGC loops. Works for me.
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00366.html (7,868 bytes)

20. Re: [RTTY] NAQP RTTY SO1R Team Score (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Turner" <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 11:49:41 -0800
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I think there should be a special team certificate for whoever comes in last. :-) 73, BIll W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00367.html (7,395 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu