Mail Archive Search: <+from:inbody@austin.utexas.edu>

Results:

References: [ +from:inbody@austin.utexas.edu: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] Age (score: 1): Author: "Donald S Inbody" <inbody@austin.utexas.edu>; Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 15:20:06 -0500; There was a quote in the book Catch 22. "He planned to live forever or die in the attempt." I'm with you, Shelby. Hold out for a "three digit" number! 73, Don/ADØK http://ad0k.net http://inbod; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-10/msg00180.html (8,412 bytes)
2. [RTTY] TS-2000, FSK, and the MFJ-1296 (score: 1): Author: "Donald S Inbody" <inbody@austin.utexas.edu>; Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 08:50:13 -0600; Does anyone use the TS-2000 and the MFJ-1296 in the FSK mode? I have yet to decipher what it takes to make that work. I have solved the AFSK problem, but, like others on this reflector, am more than; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-11/msg00000.html (6,853 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] STDYKN ?? (score: 1): Author: "Donald S Inbody" <inbody@austin.utexas.edu>; Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 07:28:51 -0600; I guess he was saying "Standby, Over." STDY = Standby KN the CW prosign for Over 73, Don/ADØK http://ad0k.net http://inbody.net/weather Hi people, Anyone any idea what this means; STDYKN ?? I; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00041.html (8,047 bytes)
4. [RTTY] A Good QSL Story (score: 1): Author: "Donald S Inbody" <inbody@austin.utexas.edu>; Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:13:26 -0600; We all have our problems and gripes about QSLing, but I feel I must tell this good story to reassure us all that we are still actually true OMs working together out there. On 13 November 2005 I was w; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00605.html (7,549 bytes)
5. [RTTY] Cabrillo Format (score: 1): Author: "Inbody, Donald S" <inbody@austin.utexas.edu>; Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 20:05:22 -0600; Can someone post a sample Cabrillo file format for me...the header and the first QSO is fine. I just want to be sure what my program is producing is the right thing. I enjoyed RTTY RU and working all; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-01/msg00064.html (7,200 bytes)
6. [RTTY] Change of E-mail address (score: 1): Author: "Inbody, Donald S" <inbody@austin.utexas.edu>; Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 20:20:17 -0600; Howdy, I am not really sure which e-mail address I use for RTTY, but how do I change it to Inbody@austin.utexas.edu? Don ADØK _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-01/msg00065.html (6,737 bytes)
7. [RTTY] WinWarbler, MFJ-1279, TS-2000 and FSK (score: 1): Author: "Inbody, Donald S" <inbody@austin.utexas.edu>; Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:40:17 -0600; Well, this was an interesting morning. Thanks to Bob (KØRC) I figured out that the MFJ-1279 had to have Jumper 5 between pins 1 and 2 AND the jumper normally on Jumper 6 (which normally keys C; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-01/msg00108.html (7,684 bytes)
8. [RTTY] FSK test on 30m (or 20m) (score: 1): Author: "Inbody, Donald S" <inbody@austin.utexas.edu>; Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:22:04 -0600; Is anyone available to meet me on 30M RTTY 10.137 +/- to see if my settings are working? 73, Don ADØK _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-01/msg00109.html (6,928 bytes)
9. [RTTY] TS-2000, MFJ-1279, WinWarbler and FSK (score: 1): Author: "Inbody, Donald S" <inbody@austin.utexas.edu>; Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:46:59 -0600; Here is the scoop on how to set it all up. Thanks to several guys (TF3TTY & KØRC plus some others) for pointing out that "normal" in the Kenwood FSK menu means "reverse" to most of us. Change; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-01/msg00111.html (7,407 bytes)
10. [RTTY] TS-2000 ACC Audio Connections (score: 1): Author: "Inbody, Donald S" <inbody@austin.utexas.edu>; Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 15:40:11 -0600; Has anyone had experience using the ACC connector on the back of the TS-2000 to pass audio to/from the rig vice using the mic connector? Seems like it ought to work, 73, Don ADØK _____________; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00036.html (6,506 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] RTTY is getting lower and lower in frequency on 20 (score: 1): Author: "Inbody, Donald S" <inbody@austin.utexas.edu>; Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 12:10:47 -0600; I'm not really sure why there is any complaining. Other than intentional jamming, CW signals have never prevented me from making a RTTY QSO, and when operating CW, I can usually close the filter down; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00103.html (9,336 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] RTTY is getting lower and lower in frequency on 20 (score: 1): Author: "Inbody, Donald S" <inbody@austin.utexas.edu>; Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 13:50:30 -0600; Excellent observation. Learning the full capability of your equipment and how to communicate under difficult circumstances is the mark of a good operator. If "arm chair" copy is the only thing one ca; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00108.html (9,222 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] need some help (score: 1): Author: "Inbody, Donald S" <inbody@austin.utexas.edu>; Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 19:16:19 -0600; In the case of the TS-2000, the "normal" setting is actually inverse, and the "inverse" setting is normal. For some reason the Japanese think FSK is normally in the USB side of the carrier freq. 73,; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00119.html (10,555 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] 160 (score: 1): Author: "Inbody, Donald S" <inbody@austin.utexas.edu>; Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:24:45 -0600; It is getting late in the year, but we should declare a 160M RTTY contest, perhaps for next winter. Minimal rules, serial, state, grid or some-such. Might stir up some activity. 73, Don ADØK -; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00285.html (8,204 bytes)
15. Re: [RTTY] 160 (score: 1): Author: "Inbody, Donald S" <inbody@austin.utexas.edu>; Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:51:56 -0600; Now this is the best thought, yet. I would get on the air for this. 73, Don ADØK One could lobby the Stew Perry sponsors to add RTTY. Or just run a RTTY-only contest during the same hours, wit; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00297.html (8,148 bytes)
16. Re: [RTTY] [dxlab] 7Q7BP NOT LOTW? (score: 1): Author: "Inbody, Donald S" <inbody@austin.utexas.edu>; Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 16:01:58 -0600; I have only noticed a few stations (two or three) using a policy of uploading LOTW only after a QSL card. Most either use LOTW or do not. I do note that DXpeditions often do not upload their LOTW log; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00301.html (31,281 bytes)
17. Re: [RTTY] 5 Band Antennas For RTTY (score: 1): Author: "Inbody, Donald S" <inbody@austin.utexas.edu>; Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 11:08:55 -0600; I use a Mosley TA53 that does a good job. Simple construction, traps, relatively short boom and four elements for five bands 20-10. Don ADØK Hi All I have noticed recently that many DXPedition; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00307.html (8,018 bytes)
18. Re: [RTTY] 160 (score: 1): Author: "Inbody, Donald S" <inbody@austin.utexas.edu>; Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:04:27 -0600; It appears to me that we are trying to two things here (well, at least two things): 1. Encourage more RTTY interest on 160M 2. Push someone to the first RTTY 160M WAS 3. Create more opportunities for; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00328.html (9,560 bytes)
19. Re: [RTTY] NCCC Practice run for NAQP? (score: 1): Author: "Inbody, Donald S" <inbody@austin.utexas.edu>; Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 14:37:24 -0600; What if we held an NAQP practice Friday night beginning at 0000Z 24 Feb and run for three or four hours. Then, for those curious about 160 M, switch to 1.81 MHz for the last ten minutes of each hour; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00331.html (7,925 bytes)
20. Re: [RTTY] 160 (score: 1): Author: "Inbody, Donald S" <inbody@austin.utexas.edu>; Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 10:14:13 -0600; Slopers have been very effective and are discussed in the ARRL Antenna Book and John Devoldere ON4UN's book Low Band DXing. Remember, even a poor antenna is infinitely better than no antenna at all,; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-02/msg00373.html (11,196 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]