RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] 160

To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] 160
From: "Inbody, Donald S" <inbody@austin.utexas.edu>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:24:45 -0600
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
It is getting late in the year, but we should declare a 160M RTTY contest, 
perhaps for next winter.  Minimal rules, serial, state, grid or some-such.  

Might stir up some activity.

73, Don ADØK

-----Original Message-----
From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On 
Behalf Of Bill Turner
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 11:12
To: Bill Coleman
Cc: roy gould; rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] 160

ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 21:36:44 -0500, Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
 wrote:

>45 baud RTTY is likely problematic. 

------------ REPLY FOLLOWS ------------

That just adds to the challenge. I have six states worked on 160 RTTY
including the rare South Dakota and am looking for more. Don't be
discouraged. What we really need is a 160 meter RTTY contest.

Someday, somebody will achieve the first 160 meter WAS on RTTY. That
is one of the few "firsts" left below 30 MHz.

Who will it be?

Bill, W6WRT
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>