Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k0rc@citlink.net: 420 ]

Total 420 documents matching your query.

381. Re: [RTTY] FT5ZM RTTY is a zoo (score: 1)
Author: "K0RC - Robert Chudek" <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2014 23:17:32 -0600
When I pushed the 20m button on my radio this afternoon, I thought I had missed an announcement for a new CQWW RTTY DX contest. There was wall-to-wall activity from 14080 up into 14120 territory! It
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00040.html (10,757 bytes)

382. Re: [RTTY] [CQ-Contest] LoTW confirmation rates (score: 1)
Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 18:06:43 -0600
Peter Laws wrote, in part "...I've never worked a 4Z or any other 4X station, so that would be a real treat. Fix that and I'll sign up." I fail to see any difference than if that *4Z* card showed up
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00212.html (10,077 bytes)

383. Re: [RTTY] 2Tone down load (score: 1)
Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 19:10:37 -0600
Are you sure it's not the unZIP program that is asking for a password? I just finished downloading and unzipping the ZIP file without any issue. 73 de Bob - KØRC in MN If you have problems downloadin
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00259.html (8,624 bytes)

384. Re: [RTTY] Amateur Radio Teletype Society Bulletins online & great new Jim Ha... (score: 1)
Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 15:57:40 -0600
I just can't resist commenting on how many people appear to be "afraid" of new technology! (That's my perception.) These text based reflectors are so "last century" it's laughable. I consider them eq
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00274.html (11,238 bytes)

385. Re: [RTTY] Amateur Radio Teletype Society Bulletins online & great new Jim Ha... (score: 1)
Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 19:10:41 -0600
The topic is drifting far from RTTY so I'll stop the inquisition, as much as I'd like to carry on! 73 de Bob - KØRC in MN On 2/23/2014 3:57 PM, Robert Chudek - K0RC wrote: Facebook, on the other hand
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00277.html (10,683 bytes)

386. Re: [RTTY] Amateur Radio Teletype Society Bulletins online & great new Jim Ha... (score: 1)
Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 20:53:11 -0600
I'm sorry but the following statement is blatantly wrong "I discovered every bit of info they glean is theirs -- never to be destroyed..." Please read the Facebook Terns of Use - Statement of Rights
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00281.html (13,512 bytes)

387. Re: [RTTY] SPAM-LOW: Re: Amateur Radio Teletype Society Bulletins online & great new Jim Ha... (score: 1)
Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 11:19:06 -0600
Those of us who do use Facebook will recognize when you delete a message, photo, or video... any links to that content pursued by others are greeted with a (paraphrased) "Sorry, that content is no lo
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00286.html (15,114 bytes)

388. Re: [RTTY] Prefix characters (score: 1)
Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 17:46:58 -0600
All my transmissions begin with CR/LF/SP (Carriage Return, Line Feed, Space). That way all of the Model 15's will return their print heads to the left margin, advance the paper one line, and indent o
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00350.html (8,169 bytes)

389. Re: [RTTY] About N4II's experiment... (score: 1)
Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 20:09:46 -0500
Why does everything have to be "taken off the reflector" for private discussion? No one learns a damn thing in that scenario. And isn't that what everyone is complaining about in the first place... D
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00091.html (9,621 bytes)

390. Re: [RTTY] About N4II's experiment... (score: 1)
Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 23:30:45 -0500
I think our moderator, Bill W6WRT, is very accommodating in allowing 'fringe discussions' on the RTTY reflector. The outcome of the FCC decision will impact all digital operators, so personally, I do
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00097.html (11,351 bytes)

391. Re: [RTTY] BARTG contest (score: 1)
Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 12:14:08 -0500
I am in the middle of updating my contest station from Windows XP to Windows 7 and I don't have the digital stuff operational yet.If you hear KØRC on RTTY this weekend, it's a slim! 73 de Bob - KØRC
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00107.html (7,747 bytes)

392. Re: [RTTY] Lack of RTTY on 40 and 80 Meters (score: 1)
Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 15:54:41 -0500
I have to agree with Tom, W7WHY regarding 160m operation. But as Bill, W6WRT mentioned, it might be better to start off as a single-band event. The Minnesota Wireless Association has an internal thre
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00286.html (12,642 bytes)

393. [RTTY] Fwd: Fwd: [CTDXCC] Rick Roderick's position (score: 1)
Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 14:09:23 -0500
Hello Greg - KØGW... You had previously communicated to me your support of the ARRL RM-11708. We are on opposite pages regarding this topic. Three things disturb me greatly in what I see developing a
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00108.html (28,459 bytes)

394. Re: [RTTY] Hardest RTTY Station to Work - EVER (score: 1)
Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 17:53:57 -0500
Here's a pileup management technique you should consider. It doesn't matter whether you have a CW, SSB, or RTTY pileup calling. YOU are the one who sets the cadence. That is your goal (managing the p
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-05/msg00118.html (12,274 bytes)

395. Re: [RTTY] Hardest RTTY Station to Work - EVER (score: 1)
Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 18:14:29 -0500
Yup, that can be a problem. Bully operators. I haven't experienced that myself (just how many KØ's are going to generate a huge pile up?), but I did listen to a SSB pile up a while back. There was an
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-05/msg00121.html (9,634 bytes)

396. Re: [RTTY] The RTTY efficiency myth (score: 1)
Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 06:40:39 -0500
"Running out of time" is actually hidden within "Available time of propagation to a given area". For example, working the endless stream of JA's on a short opening, you want to be running stations in
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-07/msg00038.html (10,418 bytes)

397. Re: [RTTY] ARES E-Letter for July 16, 2014 (score: 1)
Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 14:11:17 -0500
This event does not compare to a typical "parade" or "bike race". Take a look at the investment in the "vehicles" that participate in this corporate sponsored race. After gawking at the 15 teams and
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-07/msg00071.html (12,532 bytes)

398. Re: [RTTY] The RTTY efficiency myth and SUPERFILL (score: 1)
Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 14:22:05 -0500
/"//This selfish practice can easily be stamped out by working those individuals but not logging the QSO."/ If I were a contest adjudicator and detected this practice, I would DQ the operator (the on
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-07/msg00072.html (11,587 bytes)

399. Re: [RTTY] RTTY SkimServer Announcment (score: 1)
Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 14:27:35 -0500
What a *GREAT* message from Alex, to help convey a continued partnership in supporting the vast spectrum of RTTY systems that are in use across the world! With a global user community, there is defin
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-10/msg00024.html (11,274 bytes)

400. Re: [RTTY] W1AW/6 on 160 meter RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 23:34:58 -0500
Bill, FWIW: There are plenty of stations calling you but you're not hearing/printing them. The 0400 UTC is too early for propagation over the Rockies from the Midwest. 0600 to 0800 would be better, i
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-10/msg00083.html (8,172 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu