Peter Laws wrote, in part
"...I've never worked a 4Z or any other 4X
station, so that would be a real treat.
Fix that and I'll sign up."
I fail to see any difference than if that *4Z* card showed up in your
USPS mailbox. You still have the "option" whether to keep it or tear it
up (reject it).
In either "system", you control the legitimacy of your own QSL collection.
73 de Bob - KØRC in MN
P.S. "Yes, stirring the pot!"
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2/12/2014 2:22 PM, Peter Laws wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 6:49 PM, <Ktfrog007@aol.com> wrote:
I concur with your findings. Digital folks really like eQSL, as do I. A
lot of folks seem to vehemently dislike it, but I like to see QSLs and save
my favorites into a folder and run it as a slide show when I'm not using
As long as you can fish for QSLs with it I'm not interested.
Otherwise it's fine.
I have, waiting for me to do something about them, 1331 "eQSLs"
waiting in my inbox. One of them is from a 4Z. It's bold, so that
means the authenticity is guaranteed. I really should confirm it
because I've never worked a 4Z or any other 4X station, so that would
be a real treat.
Fix that and I'll sign up.
BTW, on LOTW I'm about 50%. All QSOs are post 1991 and the bulk of
them are post 2004 (with a scattered Qs between those two years - many
confirmed). *My* fervent wish is that more folks On The Ultra-highs
would use LOTW! I have VUCC on 50 MHz but I'd be much closer to 200
grids if more ops were on.
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|