Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kamham69@gmail.com: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [RTTY] Change in pileup procedure? (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 06:53:27 -0500
Have you really thought this through, and does your gear even support this style of operation? The reason I ask is that dual receive becomes an absolute must, and a lot of older and low end gear does
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00066.html (11,324 bytes)

22. Re: [RTTY] Change in pileup procedure? (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 18:15:52 -0500
Can we put this mess to bed? Several well thought out replies have been posted indicating this idea will not work. Here is one more: I call CQ, listening up 2-5, and I will call you on your frequency
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00138.html (12,858 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu