Mail Archive Search: <+from:psussman@pactor.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:psussman@pactor.com: 182 ]

Total 182 documents matching your query.

141. Re: [RTTY] Pactor 3 demo (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 19:36:04 -0400; I believe this thread is quite important to the RTTY community and certainly deserves public disclosure at RTTY@contesting.com. After all, is not the future survival of RTTY tied directly to the abil; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00220.html (12,328 bytes)
142. [RTTY] A RM-11708 Question (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 16:18:51 -0400; I've noticed, when following the postings on RM-11708, that the status shows: "Open". In addition, I've noticed several recent posts. Question: Is RM11708 still active? And are comments still permitt; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00263.html (7,097 bytes)
143. Re: [RTTY] Ex-parte comment filed on RM-11708 by N9NB (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 10:07:58 -0400; I've read the filing of N9NB and conclude that it well defines the situation; albeit a bit repetitive. Perhaps that's what is needed -- stating the obvious. Hopefully the contents of this filing will; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00297.html (8,113 bytes)
144. [RTTY] ARRL Membership (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2014 18:24:55 -0400; I did not renew my ARRL membership years ago. Even then, whoever coined the phrase - "Follow the money" was right. At the time I learned that most of the money 'flowing through' the ARRL and it's pai; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00349.html (6,917 bytes)
145. Re: [RTTY] What is this auto mode that QRM's me? (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 06:25:19 -0400; Joe is correct; (see below) however, there is a bigger picture. The two 'directors' put forth their 'ideas' (influenced by whatever behind the scenes motivation) and the legal counsel was tasked with; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00360.html (17,455 bytes)
146. Re: [RTTY] What is this auto mode that QRM's me? (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 10:03:28 -0400; Here's the Q&A from: http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/index.htm?job=call_signs_3&id=amateur&page=2 Q: Our club needs multiple call signs to identify different stations in a system we have put on the; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00004.html (13,243 bytes)
147. [RTTY] Info on RM-11708 (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2014 07:49:15 -0400; Has there been any word on whether the FCC had taken any action? Thanks ES 73, de Phil - N8PS _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contes; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00020.html (6,242 bytes)
148. [RTTY] Email about rm-11708 (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2014 15:16:52 -0400; Over the last week I've received some personal emails, two proporting to be media types. One was seeking info on RM-11708 and the other wanted an interview concerning (I believe) the impact of Pactor; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00040.html (6,731 bytes)
149. Re: [RTTY] W1AW/x RTTY operations (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 14:07:46 -0400; True that split operation makes sense when demand is very high. Also true that many 'not often active' hams have older equipment that actually may not operate split. Some newly minted hams have 'hand; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00065.html (10,566 bytes)
150. [RTTY] New Comment RM-11708 (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 12:20:29 -0400; Note the comments of Dan White, W5DNT on FCC RM-11708: http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7521098147 Most interesting. 73 de Phil - N8PS _______________________________________________ RTTY ma; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00103.html (6,941 bytes)
151. [RTTY] RM-11708 Question (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 19:45:29 -0400; Will all of the submissions that have been made recently on RM-11708 will even be considered? In light of what I have read recently from the ARRL, objections were made that they must be discarded as; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00309.html (6,957 bytes)
152. [RTTY] RM-11708 status (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 09:21:43 -0400; It appears the latest set of filings made to RM-11708 were posted on 23-APR-2014. A search of the 'proceeding' indicates that RM-11708 status is still open with 1097 filings -- and 167 posted within; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00351.html (6,582 bytes)
153. Re: [RTTY] PACTOR (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 09:39:43 -0400; I am a member of the "Amateur Radio Pactor and Packet Group" on Yahoo and check their 'conversations' vis PACTOR-4 and RM-11708. These operators confine themselves to 14107-14112 range and do not ven; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00352.html (9,089 bytes)
154. Re: [RTTY] PACTOR (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 12:08:38 -0400; I agree and believe there are two separate problems: 1. Automatic or Semi-Automatic stations keying up or being keyed up on top of existing QSOs. I know this happens all the time. 2. Automatic or Sem; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00359.html (10,293 bytes)
155. Re: [RTTY] PACTOR (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 13:35:33 -0400; Answer: The number of modems (SCS) sold for use for Amateur use is a small number. It is the duty of the operator to operate in a proper manner. (You can guess where this answer came from) AND Answer; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00367.html (12,676 bytes)
156. [RTTY] Test (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2014 08:06:31 -0400; Test, Forgive the bandwidth. My messages were/are not being posted. 73 de Phil - N8PS _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00205.html (6,548 bytes)
157. [RTTY] Test 2 (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2014 08:08:25 -0400; According to some published reports, the FCC has been flooded with over 300,000 comments concerning net neutrality. The FCC website was crashed, due to the high volume to the extent that a new 'mailb; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00206.html (6,913 bytes)
158. [RTTY] RM-11708 FCC Site flooded (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2014 03:05:10 -0400; According to some published reports, the FCC has been flooded with over 300,000 comments concerning net neutrality. The FCC website was crashed, due to the high volume to the extent that a new 'mailb; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00208.html (7,248 bytes)
159. [RTTY] FCC (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2014 03:07:59 -0400; According to some published reports, the FCC has been flooded with over 300,000 comments concerning net neutrality. The FCC website was crashed, due to the high volume to the extent that a new 'mailb; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00209.html (6,719 bytes)
160. Re: [RTTY] A plea for help ... (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 14:01:38 -0400; I just wonder whether the referenced comment was written by a ham to promote criticism sarcastically. On the other hand surely there are those who will actually take these comments seriously. Thus, I; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00244.html (8,920 bytes)

Current List: 141 - 160
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]