RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Pactor 3 demo

To: Glenn Wyant <va3dx@sympatico.ca>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Pactor 3 demo
From: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 19:36:04 -0400
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>

I believe this thread is quite important to the RTTY community and certainly deserves public disclosure at RTTY@contesting.com.

After all, is not the future survival of RTTY tied directly to the ability to QRM the mode right out of existence?

Note: Nobody will be 'getting back to RTTY' if auto stations are allowed to run amuk as has been documented by the behavior exhibited by those who ran this demo. This 'demo' is what happens repeatedly every day to narrowband operators.

73 de Phil - N8PS

--

Quoting Glenn Wyant <va3dx@sympatico.ca>:

Where can I  loose this thread , and get back to RTTY ?

VA3DX




Subject: Re: [RTTY] Pactor 3 demo


Your exact words were

"But again allow me to point out that for some time now these stations have
been in their own sub band."

The phrase "in their own sub band" could certainly be construed as a sub
band to which unattended stations have exclusive access.

The word "suggestion" is equally false; the FCC has never suggested that the
97.221 subbands be exclusively used by unattended stations. On the contrary,
the FCC explicitly stated that these subbands are to be *shared* among
attended and unattended stations.

You've been posting these falsehoods for years. They remain false,
none-the-less.

Is there no way to advocate your position without employing falsehoods?




-----Original Message-----
From: RTTY [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of John Becker
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 6:33 PM
To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Pactor 3 demo


Demonstrably false. Nowhere in part 97 are unattended stations in
the US
granted exclusive access to any frequency or set of frequencies.
Unattended stations are expected to share frequencies with attended
stations; among other things, that means confirming that the frequency
is clear before transmitting.
No where in my post did I say or mention the word "EXCLUSIVE"
You sure do love to nit pick everything I say.
Would the word "suggestion" work better with  you all mighty.
JAB
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty


_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty


_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty



_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>