Mail Archive Search: <+from:psussman@pactor.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:psussman@pactor.com: 182 ]

Total 182 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [RTTY] USB to Serial Convertors (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 12:48:57 -0400; The only really bad news about this transaction is that PAYPAL is the only accepted form of payment shown. That's EBAY's terms -- read 'em! Transactions with PAYPAL are NOT protected under US law bec; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-07/msg00138.html (8,532 bytes)
62. [RTTY] RTTY List & Yahoo difficulties (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 22:17:33 -0400; _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-08/msg00147.html (6,928 bytes)
63. [RTTY] RTTY List & Yahoo difficulties (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 22:17:33 -0400; _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-08/msg00148.html (6,750 bytes)
64. [RTTY] RTTY List & Yahoo difficulties (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 22:25:18 -0400; Thanks to all of you who sent me OFF List email in an attempt to clear up the reason why I was unable to receive messages on YAHOO.COM. Two reasons has been discovered. First, as noted by two others,; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-08/msg00149.html (7,721 bytes)
65. Re: [RTTY] Zone sent as letters? (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 01:25:05 -0400; Jim, It's the dreaded USOS (Unshift on Space) rearing it's ugly head. In the "who's fault is it" sense the answer is most likely both. For things to work correctly USOS must be in sync, and things li; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-09/msg00098.html (7,857 bytes)
66. Re: [RTTY] Zone sent as letters? (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 04:12:51 -0400; Chen, Your explanation, as usual, is concise and far better than I could have ever expressed it. Thank you, 73, de N8PS PS. I was sure that I was correct with the - sign. -- _________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-09/msg00101.html (9,542 bytes)
67. Re: [RTTY] Zone sent as letters? (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 12:42:19 -0400; If the USOS 'feature' is set to ON: (as I understand it) ON TRANSMIT: If there is a space after a numeric character, the sending software inserts a 'shift FIGS' character into the transmitted data st; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-09/msg00103.html (11,693 bytes)
68. Re: [RTTY] Zone sent as letters? (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 23:27:43 -0400; I'm still a bit confused with USOS. I'm clear on the transmitting side. On the receiving side, if USOS is engaged: By convention, does the receiving software insert a shift-FIGS character when a spac; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-09/msg00152.html (10,194 bytes)
69. Re: [RTTY] RTTY contest questions and comments (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:15:05 -0400; In my experience, that lag into TX has more to do with the operating software than anything else. A logging program often runs on a slow old computer. Sometimes an 'auto-fill' doesn't work or the mou; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-09/msg00171.html (9,696 bytes)
70. Re: [RTTY] 160m in RTTY Contests (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:22:13 -0500; Personally .. not being a frantic contester, I'd prefer an area to escape contesting and rag chew. Even now, contesters often invade 17m and 12m which makes one wonder about who reads the rules anywa; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-10/msg00158.html (7,826 bytes)
71. Re: [RTTY] Topband: 160m in RTTY Contests (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 11:35:18 -0500; Jim, et. el. I tried RTTY on 160m last night. No luck and lots of noise. I vote for Chen -- his explanation for 160m operation is not emotional and makes much sense. 73 de Phil - N8PS PS. I hit 'repl; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-10/msg00246.html (12,263 bytes)
72. Re: [RTTY] Topband: 160m in RTTY Contests (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 21:53:12 -0500; You make an excellent point, Bill. We can agree that it is possible to make a 160m RTTY contact; however, a RTTY contest on 160m would be frustrating to all (to say the least). As you point out, the; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-10/msg00257.html (10,373 bytes)
73. [RTTY] Re: Any EQSL is invalid (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 02:56:08 -0500; Here's a reprint of "My 2-cents" regarding fraud and QSLs Fraud goes back to the first days of radio. Once all stations were 'pirates'. Today fraudulent stations and operators still exist. Some of th; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-11/msg00045.html (8,448 bytes)
74. [RTTY] RTTY WELCOME DAY - 01 JANUARY 2010 (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 00:07:40 -0500; Just a quick reminder that 01-JAN-10 will be here soon: RTTY WELCOME DAY 01 JANUARY 2010 ALL DAY LONG Meet and greet other RTTY operators. No hours, No rules, No score, No pressure, No quota, No log; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-12/msg00034.html (7,584 bytes)
75. [RTTY] RTTY Welcome Day 01 January 2010 (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 02:41:12 -0500; Here's your chance to meet new hams and greet other RTTY operators without the pressure of a contest exchange. Please plan to participate, if only for an hour or two. Last year there were a few 'rare; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-12/msg00087.html (7,136 bytes)
76. Re: [RTTY] Dashes in Contest Reports (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:10:21 -0500; When dealing with the dash, the authority to consult is CHEN. He can explain hows and whys of the dash. I remember reading an excellent explanation. Hopefully, Chen has an 'instant replay' of his in; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00271.html (11,263 bytes)
77. Re: [RTTY] Dashes in Contest Reports (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:03:42 -0500; Thanks Chen for your observations. As usual very thoughtful. A question however: Doesn't a reply of 123 123-123 create a USOS problem regarding the space between the two strings? Perhaps I mean unshi; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00283.html (9,301 bytes)
78. [RTTY] USOS Question (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 05:45:48 -0500; Not to beat a dead horse and I'm sure that I've asked this question before. I just can not find the related answer. While I understand USOS, I can't differentiate between sending and receiving USOS.; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00352.html (9,977 bytes)
79. Re: [RTTY] USOS Question (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:13:29 -0500; --snip-- Rich is correct with respect to the sending station. However, it does matter when the receiving station replies to an exchange and the former sending station has to receive. Hence, my parado; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00360.html (7,652 bytes)
80. Re: [RTTY] USOS Question (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:28:48 -0500; Yes, Chen, you are correct, I goofed in case #8. Just a test of your keen powers of observation, eh? <grin> Meanwhile, I was advised that: So, how does that affect my USOS conception? If there an eff; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-01/msg00362.html (11,307 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]