Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:radioman@frpd.org: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] Telnet/Packet and the RTTY RU/Revision the Rules (score: 1)
Author: Radioman <radioman@frpd.org>
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 11:41:44 -0500
Rules need to be changed.. here in Ma, a new rule was added if you get cault with flying snow from your car is a 500 dollar fine.. the rule was added this year, for all the meat heads too lazy to cle
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00184.html (13,033 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] The Iron Butt Award goes to..... (score: 1)
Author: Radioman <radioman@frpd.org>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 19:08:58 -0500
Eeeep.. like a Satalite hitting a moon rock..? Tony _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00166.html (8,106 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] Yaesu 920 & Rigblaster (score: 1)
Author: Radioman <radioman@frpd.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 22:37:37 -0500
Kyle.. after reparing 3 Rascals, and hring about more that are NOT soldered at the Din/socket connection, for the radio side of the business, id look there, when i soldered mine the Rascal worked, i
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00261.html (7,824 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] AGC: on or off? (score: 1)
Author: Radioman <radioman@frpd.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 21:43:41 -0500
Hi Peter! for years ive been using AGC-Fast for RTTY and AGC-Slow for SSB, In the IC-746 Manual says for fast AGC recovery for Digital modes using FSK AGC-FAST AGC-Slow for other digital modes using
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00711.html (7,509 bytes)

5. Re: [RTTY] AGC: on or off? (score: 1)
Author: Radioman <radioman@frpd.org>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 19:20:34 -0500
Don.. thats a good one.. the IC-746 just has the fast/slow or off no other way for in-betweens sort to say of AGC but i could see that making a difference in recovery.. Tony NN1D ____________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00730.html (9,943 bytes)

6. [RTTY] HF-2V or HF-6V (score: 1)
Author: Radioman <radioman@frpd.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:32:58 -0500
This is most likely not the list for this, BUT anyone had any luck on RTTY with either? HF-2V or the HF-6V, ive been looking for a vertical for the second station, but Gap/Butternut/Crush craft? so m
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00179.html (6,633 bytes)

7. Re: [RTTY] HF-2V or HF-6V (score: 1)
Author: Radioman <radioman@frpd.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:45:19 -0500
After all the great responses, it's starting to favor the HF9V, im just not to happy about burying 400+ feet of wire cut into ground radials in the yard, i don't use a KW just 100 watts and the anten
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00209.html (8,113 bytes)

8. [RTTY] 5 Band WAS RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Radioman <radioman@frpd.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 23:24:42 -0500
This is a little off beat, but working on the 5 band WAS RTTY, ive ran right out of QSL cards, and its time to either make more home brew cards or get some made up.. any ideas? on who, or is anyone m
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00442.html (6,914 bytes)

9. Re: [RTTY] 5 Band WAS RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Radioman <radioman@frpd.org>
Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2006 02:25:58 -0500
Ok... thanks for all the great responses about the cards! 73 - Tony NN1D _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/list
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00071.html (7,815 bytes)

10. Re: [RTTY] 5 Band WAS RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Radioman <radioman@frpd.org>
Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2006 15:16:06 -0500
Kewl, 3 bands down, Almost there! just need ham's like YOU to return the cards, for the rest Tony NN1D _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lis
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00080.html (10,363 bytes)

11. Re: [RTTY] telnet (score: 1)
Author: Radioman <radioman@frpd.org>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 10:50:47 -0400
If your not into the AR-thing... DX-Spider is another route... http://www.yccc.org/Resources/DXCluster/net/internet.htm Tony NN1D _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTT
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-05/msg00106.html (7,263 bytes)

12. Re: [RTTY] ZL8R and RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Radioman <radioman@frpd.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 21:28:24 -0400
It Means just that! give the small pistols a chance, instead of multiple contacts with the big guns. no? NN1D _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com htt
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00181.html (7,201 bytes)

13. Re: [RTTY] ZL8R and RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Radioman <radioman@frpd.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 21:49:06 -0400
Sooo... whatsa RTTY Dupe? working more then 1 time? no RTTY dupes next 24 hours... im my interp. means sri QSO-B4 no? i think they wanted new stations and not the same, over and over again to make sh
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-10/msg00182.html (8,136 bytes)

14. Re: [RTTY] $$$$$$ Collector (score: 1)
Author: Radioman <radioman@frpd.org>
Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2006 21:55:38 -0500
Owning a cluster im seeing more and more vulgar and pitiful/bad use of the announcements feature, and just poor ungentlemen like behavior and i really hope it wasn't some from this list... Tony NN1D
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-11/msg00019.html (10,325 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu