Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:tgstewart: 24 ] [ at (Too many documents hit. Ignored) ] [ pepco.com: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Ahh yess.... the old SO2R debate! (score: 226)
Author: tgstewart at pepco.com (tgstewart@pepco.com)
Date: Fri Jan 24 10:13:11 2003
As I've pointed out many times before, the SOnR has always been perfectly legal in the Single Op category (as long as there is only one transmitter on at a time). Therefore, any restriction on operat
/archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00310.html (10,569 bytes)

2. [RTTY] Ahh yess.... the old SO2R debate! (score: 226)
Author: tgstewart at pepco.com (tgstewart@pepco.com)
Date: Fri Jan 24 13:13:25 2003
...which is inconsequential since it's a relatively insignificant contest of little interest to most serious competitors. I predict it will stay that way. Jerry Flanders <jeflanders@comcast.net> 01/2
/archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00320.html (12,330 bytes)

3. [RTTY] Ahh yess.... the old SO2R debate! (score: 226)
Author: tgstewart at pepco.com (tgstewart@pepco.com)
Date: Fri Jan 24 14:56:35 2003
-- Forwarded by Tyler G Stewart/BENN/PEP on 01/24/2003 01:25 PM -- Tyler G Stewart 01/24/2003 01:15 PM ...standard operating procedure for SO2R RTTY at the top stations. Only trick is keeping only on
/archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00324.html (7,941 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu