RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

[RTTY] Ahh yess.... the old SO2R debate!

To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: [RTTY] Ahh yess.... the old SO2R debate!
From: tgstewart at pepco.com (tgstewart@pepco.com)
Date: Fri Jan 24 10:13:11 2003
As I've pointed out many times before, the SOnR has always been perfectly 
legal in the Single Op category (as long as there is only one transmitter 
on at a time).

Therefore, any restriction on operating flexibility like that would have 
to become a new category called Single Op Limited (SOL) or SOSR or 
whatever, which could also include other restrictions such as antennas, 
power, operating time if you like.

Single Op records have been set for decades using the existing rules and 
making any major change like that would void the significance of any past 
performance in the class.

My point is, if you are the one having the problem with the existing 
category, it is up to you and whoever else to create a new category for 
you rather than trying to kick the SO2R guys out of their category.  You 
can then start your own set of records for the Limited class that will 
have relevance.

For some reason, the few people I've confronted with this distinction dont 
quite seem to "get it"!  Hi!

73, Ty K3MM







"Tom Moore" <wx4tm@direcway.com>
Sent by: rtty-bounces@contesting.com
01/24/2003 08:17 AM

 
        To:     "WI8W" <wi8w@arrl.net>, <rtty@contesting.com>
        cc: 
        Subject:        Re: [RTTY] Club Competition in 2004 RTTY Roundup


I may be off a year or so in the following, but as I recall:

at the 2000 dayton hamvention rtty forum, 100+ rtty contesters
voted overwhelmingly that SO2R should be a separate contest
category..

during the following year, the reflectors were often crowded
with heated discussion on this issue..

at the 2001 dayton hamvention rtty forum, it was said up front
that no disucssion would be allowed on the SO2R  separate
category issue..

at the 2002 hamvention, the rtty forum focused on how to do
SO2R but refused to allow disucssion on the separate category
issue..

Throughout this period, not one single contest sponsor has
publicly or directly addressed this issue until  two members of
the arrl hudson div finally were able to get the issue on the agenda
for the recent arrl msc meeting.. at which, the committee apparently
felt there was not sufficient interest on this issue to warrant
studying.

Contest sponsors and log checkers are not looking for extra work
and they are prone to not being willing to change anything until publicly
forced to do so.  So as I see it, while there  appears to be a majority
of rtty contesters who agree that SO2R should be a separate category,
no one has stepped forward to organize an effort to present a clear and
convinceable case to contest organizers proving their rules are grossly
unfair to the average SO1R contest participant.  Until that happens, I
doubt we'll ever see any change..

Tom WX4TM


----- Original Message -----
From: "WI8W" <wi8w@arrl.net>
To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 6:00 AM
Subject: RE: [RTTY] Club Competition in 2004 RTTY Roundup


> leave it to the ARRL to once again close the door after the horse has
gotten
> out of the barn.  I wonder how many years they have been pondering this
> little tidbit.  I wonder how many years before the popular SO2R will be 
a
> separate catagory.  They have yet another horse in that barn.  soapbox
off.
>
> yep, I am a life member of the league
>
> 73
>
> Thom WI8W
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>


_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>