Mail Archive Search: <+from:w0mu@w0mu.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:w0mu@w0mu.com: 220 ]

Total 220 documents matching your query.

1. RE: [CQ-Contest] A little LoTW gotcha (score: 1): Author: "Mike Fatchett, W0MU" <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 18:11:53 -0700; I think it is easier getting top secret clearance than access to LOTW. It has to be the more user unfriendly system around and I am an IT guy. I am all for eliminating as much cheating as possible bu; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-02/msg00109.html (11,669 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] New RTTY Operators (score: 1): Author: "Mike Fatchett W0MU" <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 13:56:14 -0700; New to the list and somewhat new to RTTY, old time contester. I had my fair share of Name, Qth etc but I will trade that for contacts any day. I had one guy ask when it was quiet my name which was fi; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-01/msg00113.html (8,784 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] [3830] RTTY Roundup VO1TTY(VO1HP) Single Op LP (score: 1): Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 19:58:34 -0700; Probably the same QRP guy that posted on the Elecraft board, ticked off because we were using his QRP frequency..... _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-01/msg00131.html (8,703 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] VP6DX RTTY (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 08:09:23 -0700; I guess the contact is not all that important then......... _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-02/msg00282.html (8,691 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] 6 Meter RTTY is on 50.180 (score: 1): Author: "w0mu" <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 20:35:02 -0600; Better yet listen below 50.100 for the many different beacon stations that are on the air and when you start hearing them you will know the band is open or starting to open. There are a number of web; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-06/msg00030.html (11,780 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] Best RTTY program/hardware (score: 1): Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 09:25:55 -0700; I have an IMAC and I use bootcamp to load both the Mac OS and Windows XP. Best of both worlds. You have to chose which to run with boot camp. There are other options out that let you run Windows insi; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00498.html (10,770 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] PSK contesting? (score: 1): Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:31:31 -0700; I use N1MM with MMTTY MMVARI. The two programs work very well together. "A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over." Ben Franklin --Original Message-- F; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00146.html (8,457 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] N6ML(@N6RO) SO2R WPX RTTY practice (score: 1): Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 20:56:54 -0700; The SSB practice was pretty lightly attended. I managed about 10 contacts in the 2200Z RTTY Session today. Only qso on 40 was with P49X. Loud long before sunset. W0MU "A slip of the foot you may soon; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00177.html (7,916 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] N1MM scoring glitch in WPX (score: 1): Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 12:45:38 -0700; Was this one of the new rule changes? Not a big deal as the logs will be scored by CQ. If I recall correctly points are not even part of a cabrillo log. I am sure they will fix this quickly. Mike "A; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00205.html (8,931 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] Sent dupe serial numbers (score: 1): Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:28:59 -0700; You can leave a note in the comments section of what you did. You might have to manually change your Cabrillo log so it has the same sn sent twice. The contest robots might balk at that as I have nev; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00233.html (10,139 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] macros (score: 1): Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:11:03 -0700; I only had one station send me 5nn. Not that I made a ton of contacts but this is an improvement. Some people strung together the report and sn which was a pain 599005599005. What is the current feel; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00272.html (10,011 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] macros (score: 1): Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:05:42 -0700; I use N1MM and I clicked on it to see how smart it was and it didn't populate the field. Maybe there was other crud on one side or the other. I can live with or without the dashes. "A slip of the foo; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00277.html (9,911 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] Fun, but (score: 1): Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 14:49:49 -0700; I heard some awful sounding rtty during the contest. MMTTY decoded them. I have no clue what why they sounded odd but they did. I also had a fair number of people who called pretty far off frequency.; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00024.html (11,910 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] Interface (score: 1): Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 14:51:34 -0700; I have had great luck with the Microham products. I have an MK2R+ and a Microkeyer II. Both work great for RTTY. I have some rigblaster products and prefer the MicroHam products. "A slip of the foot; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00025.html (7,323 bytes)
15. Re: [RTTY] Fun, but (score: 1): Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 15:44:36 -0700; Not in that particular case as the station tried to brute force his way into my log about 5 times even after telling him to please wait and that I was working another station. In that case it wouldn'; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00033.html (9,428 bytes)
16. Re: [RTTY] Sprint RTTY Rules (score: 1): Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 18:38:58 -0700; Aruba or going home. I bet that was a tough decision! HI! "A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over." Ben Franklin --Original Message-- From: rtty-boun; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00104.html (8,825 bytes)
17. Re: [RTTY] MMTTY - N1MM & WL (score: 1): Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 09:41:05 -0700; You just need to tell N1MM where to find your MMTTY Installation. N1MM works great. "A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over." Ben Franklin --Original; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00109.html (8,108 bytes)
18. Re: [RTTY] Calibration Check with W1AW RTTY Bulletin (score: 1): Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 20:28:00 -0700; I also recently learned that you can set the receive freq to 915hz so you don't have to listen to that very high pitch at 2125. Just tell MMTTY you are running 915 and everything works great. "A slip; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00127.html (9,286 bytes)
19. Re: [RTTY] NAQP RTTY Frequencies (score: 1): Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 09:21:59 -0700; Sorry to disagree but we SHARE our frequencies. None of our frequencies are exclusive use and I hope we never get to the point that we have exclusive frequencies as it will be the beginning of the en; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00138.html (11,826 bytes)
20. Re: [RTTY] NAQP RTTY Frequencies & the DX beacons (score: 1): Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 17:45:42 -0700; Granting a waiver for unattended operation is a far cry from OWNING the frequency. If 14.100 is not to be used then the rules would have been changed to exclude that and 1 KC on either side. This typ; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00150.html (14,182 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]