Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+DXCC\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+DXCC\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

21. [RTTY] DXCC (score: 1): Author: WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 12:01:11 -0700; Seems that nothing is ever new under the sun. Long ago in the world of the ARRL and RTTY there was only the basic certificate. They counted the first 100 and issued you one. That's why for many years; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00058.html (8,609 bytes)
22. Re: [RTTY] DXCC (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 15:57:32 -0400; Or as Shakespeare penned ... Romeo and Juliet (II, ii, 1-2) It's time to put all of this behind us ... ARRL have decided to change the name of RTTY DXCC to Digital DXCC to more properly reflect the t; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00059.html (8,323 bytes)
23. Re: [RTTY] DXCC (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 18:15:31 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: I am not putting this behind me and I hope others don't either. The ARRL has made a major blunder with their decision and I intend to keep pestering them about it every chanc; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00066.html (8,595 bytes)
24. Re: [RTTY] DXCC (score: 1): Author: Michael Haack <mikehaack@aol.com>; Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 20:58:23 -0500; What he said.... 73 Mike, WB9B _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00068.html (9,227 bytes)
25. Re: [RTTY] DXCC (score: 1): Author: Andrei Stchislenok <asnp3d@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 22:02:49 -0400; *"The ARRL should be increasing the scope of their awards, not shrinking it. There is no reason, other than laziness, for refusing to acknowledge the many different accomplishments possible with vari; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00069.html (10,200 bytes)
26. Re: [RTTY] DXCC (score: 1): Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 00:49:49 -0500; "The ARRL should be increasing the scope of their awards, not shrinking it." They are doing neither. They are simply renaming the award to embrace all digital communications. As a prolific operator o; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00072.html (10,152 bytes)
27. Re: [RTTY] DXCC (score: 1): Author: Andrei Stchislenok <asnp3d@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 06:39:22 -0400; As a prolific operator of PSK31, I have worked DXCC on that mode. I certainly don't want "RTTY DXCC" printed on my certificate. I didn't work those 100+ stations on RTTY. HI Bob, I am with you here.; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00073.html (11,424 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 27
Page: [1] [2]