Mail Archive Search: <+from:n4uk@mindspring.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:n4uk@mindspring.com: 72 ]

Total 72 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] Stuff for sale due to downsizing (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com); Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 08:50:42 -0500; I am re-locating to Virginia in the coming months. I am not looking forward to the disassembly of my station or the taking down of my 4 towers. Anyone know anyone interested in a 2 acre QTH with a co; /archives//html/SECC/2003-01/msg00110.html (6,977 bytes)
2. [SECC] FT1000MP 4 sale Not FT100!! (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com); Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 09:19:12 -0500; Thanks to K4OGG for catching my typo FT1000MP with 500,250 cw and 2k ssb filter- 2,000 Henry 3K Ultra HF AMP- 1,400 Ken, N4UK 864-787-9900 More stuff to follow throughout the next couple of weeks...; /archives//html/SECC/2003-01/msg00111.html (6,293 bytes)
3. [SECC] ARRL 160M contest (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com); Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 12:13:19 -0500; Hi to everyone, Missed my second CQWW SSB in a row due to work and family obligations. I am going to make sure that I do not miss the 160m contests and am advertising for good CW contesters intereste; /archives//html/SECC/2002-10/msg00110.html (6,869 bytes)
4. [SECC] FT1000MP problem (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com); Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2002 08:54:27 -0400; I recently switched on my main FT1000MP after a 3 month hiatus. It was totally disconnected from the antennas and the A/C power during the 3 month period. As soon as it was turned on the fan came on; /archives//html/SECC/2002-07/msg00000.html (6,082 bytes)
5. [SECC] Yaesu Repair contact number (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com); Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 11:31:56 -0400; Can someone give me the name or the phone number of the guy who repairs Yaesu equipment down north of Atlanta? He has my FT1000mp and I lost his phone number. Thanks, Ken n4uk; /archives//html/SECC/2002-07/msg00066.html (6,391 bytes)
6. [SECC] ARRL votes to drop contest results in QST? (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com); Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 10:07:50 -0400; Well, I no longer see a need to subscribe to QST as this was the only reason I renewed each year anyway. Does the league think I subscribe to QST just to see silly pictures of garages, street signs,; /archives//html/SECC/2002-07/msg00128.html (6,652 bytes)
7. [SECC] SECC CW Ops (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com); Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 16:39:39 -0400; Just noticed my callsign below. Can't do the NAQP on the 4th. Just got my new pool installed and will be spending the rest of the weekends that remain this summer sipping Mai Tais, sliding down the w; /archives//html/SECC/2002-07/msg00159.html (9,373 bytes)
8. [SECC] CQ from Wellington, NZ (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com); Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 01:45:06 -0400; Hi Guys, I'm presently in Wellington, New Zealand and will be visiting the Quartz Hill Contest club tomorrow. I hope to get on 21.300 or 14.200 around 0200-0300Z SaTURDAY (YOUR fRIDAY NIGHT AT 10-111; /archives//html/SECC/2002-04/msg00066.html (6,304 bytes)
9. [SECC] ARRL-DX Phone (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com); Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 14:36:34 -0500; create a pileup. 73, Gary K9AY -- _______________________________________________ SECC mailing list SECC@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc; /archives//html/SECC/2002-03/msg00009.html (7,155 bytes)
10. [SECC] Station progress @ N4UK (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com); Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2002 16:14:23 -0500; Thanks to help from W4OC, my KLM40M2 2el 40m yagi will go up tomorrow on top of the 120 foot 160m tower. We have all of the materials in hand to isolate the 160m RF, re-tune the tower and get everyth; /archives//html/SECC/2002-02/msg00038.html (6,872 bytes)
11. [SECC] CQ160M SSB Contest (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com); Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 10:38:18 -0500; What are you guys planning on doing in the 160m SSB contest as far as frequency use is concerned??? Is the FCC going to issue warnings to contesters if they operate from 1803 and up during the contes; /archives//html/SECC/2002-02/msg00081.html (7,835 bytes)
12. [SECC] CQ160M SSB Contest (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com); Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 11:25:49 -0500; Like I said. If everyone is contesting with SSB throughout the entire band during the CQWW160 SSB contest then I will join them. If it's legal and will only impact the band for a single contest weeke; /archives//html/SECC/2002-02/msg00086.html (9,212 bytes)
13. [SECC] Blown 6 Pak/ There goes the ARRL SOAB plan.... (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com); Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 08:07:04 -0500; Well, I managed to blow up my 6 PAK relay system last night. Somehow RF managed to get to the Band decoder from the ICE filter system while on 10 meters. While transmitting high power on 10m the band; /archives//html/SECC/2002-02/msg00092.html (7,395 bytes)
14. [SECC] CQ 160m contest this weekend (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com); Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 08:10:06 -0500; I haven't seen any chatter about the CQ160M ssb contest this weekend. Anyone getting on in any way?? I will be SOSB HP this weekend. I hope to work some of you. The contest starts at 5PM this Friday; /archives//html/SECC/2002-02/msg00093.html (6,713 bytes)
15. [SECC] Stop policemen on 160 SSB (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com); Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 13:47:15 -0500; Dave, I was harassed extensively last night when I made a foray below 1843. I asked if the frequency was in use and then proceeded to operated briefly around 1818. I was QRMed with tuning, comments,; /archives//html/SECC/2002-02/msg00098.html (10,004 bytes)
16. [SECC] Stop policemen on 160 SSB (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com); Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 08:19:57 -0500; You hit the nail right on the head. I love 160m but one thing I hate is someone who controls the opinions of the masses to get the numbers in his favor. This is exactly what w4zv does on "his" reflec; /archives//html/SECC/2002-02/msg00111.html (13,128 bytes)
17. [SECC] Topband: 160m band plan (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com); Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 08:41:00 -0500; Has anyone considered the fact that DX will most likely pick a receive frequency that will most likely be occupied by the numerous ragchewers that live above 1843? These are the guys with low dipoles; /archives//html/SECC/2002-02/msg00113.html (10,154 bytes)
18. [SECC] N4UK CQ160SSB (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com); Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 08:49:08 -0500; Had a great time even though I was having trouble keeping awake. I was quite disgusted by the behavior of the "bandplan" police. Spent the contest horse racing with W4MYA with our scores overtaking e; /archives//html/SECC/2002-02/msg00114.html (6,969 bytes)
19. [SECC] SEDXC or SECC? (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com); Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 13:01:46 -0500; CQWW SSB scores credited to SEDXC for sure? What is the complete name? Southeast DX Club? n4uk -- SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesting.com/ Submissions: secc@contesting.com Administrative requests; /archives//html/SECC/2002-02/msg00122.html (6,488 bytes)
20. [SECC] Logs Due (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com); Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 14:28:34 -0500; Bill, my logs for both were sent in last week. I do have a question though. Even though both sponsors say that the Cabrillo summary is good enough I noted that it really isn't a summary as it does no; /archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00013.html (7,790 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]