- 1. [SECC] ARRL 160M contest (score: 1)
- Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com)
- Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 12:13:19 -0500
- Hi to everyone, Missed my second CQWW SSB in a row due to work and family obligations. I am going to make sure that I do not miss the 160m contests and am advertising for good CW contesters intereste
- /archives//html/SECC/2002-10/msg00110.html (6,869 bytes)
- 2. [SECC] ARRL 160m contest (score: 1)
- Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com)
- Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 10:02:04 -0500
- Looks like a Multi operation is going to happen @ N4UK. AA4NN, AA4S and N4UK (maybe W4OC) will be trying out the new 1/4wl tower vertical and the new 600 ft NE beverage the weekend of the 7th/8th/9th
- /archives//html/SECC/2001-11/msg00156.html (7,565 bytes)
- 3. [SECC] ARRL 160m contest (score: 1)
- Author: w4an@contesting.com (Bill Fisher W4AN)
- Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 11:41:53 -0500 (EST)
- Again, my station is available for anyone who wants to put in a full time effort. 73 -- SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesting.com/ Submissions: secc@contesting.com Administrative requests: secc-REQ
- /archives//html/SECC/2001-11/msg00157.html (8,255 bytes)
- 4. [SECC] ARRL 160m contest (score: 1)
- Author: aa4nn@juno.com (Joe L Blackwell)
- Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 07:08:55 -0500
- Looking at my situation, it wouldn't take too much effort to get my 160m InvL back into operation. Would it be better for SECC if I ran a serious effort from AA4NN? 73, Joe, aa4nn -- SECC on the Web:
- /archives//html/SECC/2001-11/msg00163.html (7,874 bytes)
- 5. [SECC] ARRL 160m contest (score: 1)
- Author: w4an@contesting.com (Bill Fisher W4AN)
- Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 08:45:29 -0500 (EST)
- Absolutely yes!!!! But, would you have more fun? 73 Bill -- SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesting.com/ Submissions: secc@contesting.com Administrative requests: secc-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems
- /archives//html/SECC/2001-11/msg00167.html (8,657 bytes)
- 6. [SECC] ARRL 160m contest (score: 1)
- Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com)
- Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 09:53:03 -0500
- This is why I prefer a Multi effort. Lots more fun and a lot less boring! And I usually don't have the time to dedicate all weekend for a single op. effort. I have a prior Christmas party commitment
- /archives//html/SECC/2001-11/msg00170.html (9,800 bytes)
- 7. [SECC] ARRL 160m contest (score: 1)
- Author: gabnjb@earthlink.net (Gary Breed)
- Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 16:37:05 -0500
- Are there any other hotshot SECC member CW ops interested in coming by to help out from here for the ARRL 160m contest the weekend of the 7th of December? I have some out of towners interested but th
- /archives//html/SECC/2001-11/msg00182.html (7,277 bytes)
- 8. [SECC] ARRL 160m Contest (score: 1)
- Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (Ken Ramirez)
- Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 07:22:33 -0500
- Anyone interested in coming to Greenville, SC for the ARRL 160m Contest in December? The new shack above the garage is almost finished. Another 2-3 weeks and it should be ready for M/S contesting. De
- /archives//html/SECC/2000-11/msg00005.html (6,657 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu