Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:74010.2230@compuserve.com: 26 ]

Total 26 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Orion LO phase question (score: 1)
Author: 74010.2230@compuserve.com (Darrel Emerson)
Date: Mon May 26 21:38:21 2003
If you have the Orion main receiver and sub receiver both on USB at exactly the same frequency setting, then, for a given choice of filters in each, is there a constant phase offset in the AF output
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg01034.html (7,265 bytes)

2. [TenTec] Thanks to Ten-tec (score: 1)
Author: 74010.2230@compuserve.com (Darrel Emerson)
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 22:58:34 -0500
I'm a new Ten-Tec user and new to this list. I recently bought a used Pegasus. My only, very minor complaint was low level spurious tones in the rx output, which couldn't be heard, but which were vis
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-12/msg00165.html (7,012 bytes)

3. [TenTec] Pegasus, magnetic interference & solution (score: 1)
Author: 74010.2230@compuserve.com (Darrel Emerson)
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 06:47:45 -0700
I found I was getting slight 60 Hz and 120 Hz modulation of signals received with the Pegasus. This was not noticeable by ear, but using the Waterfall display of a PSK31 program it was very obvious o
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-11/msg00263.html (7,728 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] where to find airpax? (score: 1)
Author: Darrel Emerson <74010.2230@compuserve.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 13:25:43 -0700
Mike seems to have a good point. From the Airpax web site, the Airpax model: T11-1-20.0A-01-10A-V is quoted as "Fast" but with a trip time of up to 10 seconds. However, the model: T11-0-20.0A-01-10A-
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00494.html (8,825 bytes)

5. [TenTec] Re:TenTec Hamfest (score: 1)
Author: Darrel Emerson <74010.2230@compuserve.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2004 07:56:04 -0700
For those in the Southwest, TenTec is also listed in the list of exhibitors at: 2004 ARRL Southwest Division Convention Phoenix, Arizona - August 27-29, 2004 http://www.hamradio2004.com/swdc2004/ Thi
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00004.html (7,417 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] apparent match possible in T Tuner (score: 1)
Author: Darrel Emerson <74010.2230@compuserve.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 19:47:27 -0500
On the relative efficiency of T-networks vs. L-networks: it's very instructive to play with the simulated T-net tuner from Kevin Schmidt, W9CF on: http://fermi.la.asu.edu/w9cf/tuner/tuner.html This i
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00562.html (10,405 bytes)

7. [TenTec] TenTec receivers (score: 1)
Author: Darrel Emerson <74010.2230@compuserve.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 17:52:06 -0400
I was interested to see, in a fascinating NIST document that describes the NIST time service (WWV, WWVH and WWVB in particular) that there's a picture of a TenTec RX340 - see Fig 3.11 in http://tf.ni
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00127.html (7,021 bytes)

8. [TenTec] RX-320 (score: 1)
Author: 74010.2230@compuserve.com
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 13:39:30 -0500
Hi Ed, N9DG gave a perfect summary of the differences between the RX-320 and the Pegasus. Apart from those points, they are identical. I use the RX320 as a 2nd receiver to my Pegasus, using N4PY's so
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00209.html (8,218 bytes)

9. [TenTec] cw settings (score: 1)
Author: Darrel Emerson <74010.2230@compuserve.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 16:24:15 -0500
In response to Ken's question: The ITU Recommendation ITU-R SM.328 does address this. This is a 74-page document, called 'Spectra and Bandwidth of Emissions". It includes: "#1.20 BUILD-UP TIME OF A T
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00478.html (11,142 bytes)

10. [TenTec] NEW Jupiter firmware (score: 1)
Author: Darrel Emerson <74010.2230@compuserve.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:24:56 -0500
I wonder if there's any chance of this Jupiter upgrade migrating to the Pegasus. There's not been a Pegasus firmwate upgrade since 2003, and this extra DSP filter would be very welcome! 73 Darrel, aa
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00755.html (7,016 bytes)

11. [TenTec] Rx-320 as beacon receiver? (score: 1)
Author: Darrel Emerson <74010.2230@compuserve.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2006 09:48:37 -0500
I use a RX320 to monitor the NCDXF beacons for most of the time. I find BeaconSee to be the most convenient software for this - it already knows how to control an RX320, and many other rigs. BeaconSe
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00915.html (8,387 bytes)

12. [TenTec] RX366 phase coherent with main receiver? (score: 1)
Author: Darrel <74010.2230@compuserve.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 06:35:13 -0700
With an RX366 board installed, is the secondary receiver now phase coherent with the main receiver? Are all the LO and digitizer clocks common between both receivers? Thanks, Darrel, aa7fv __________
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00135.html (6,781 bytes)

13. [TenTec] OCF antennas evolution (score: 1)
Author: Darrel <74010.2230@compuserve.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 21:30:25 -0700
The article was called "Everything Works", by Tom Schiller, N6BT, and was published in the July 2000 QST. ARRL members can download it via http://www.arrl.org/arrl-periodicals-archive-search . 73, Da
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00278.html (9,800 bytes)

14. [TenTec] RX320 & Pegasus rig control (score: 1)
Author: Darrel <74010.2230@compuserve.com>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 11:16:37 -0700
I have recently been using my RX320 and Pegasus to monitor the NCDXF beacons, using the program Faros. (See http://www.dxatlas.com/faros/.) This a great program for monitoring the beacons, and can tu
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00391.html (7,631 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] RX320 & Pegasus rig control (score: 1)
Author: Darrel <74010.2230@compuserve.com>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 13:34:06 -0700
Many thanks, Carl. Knowing that now has saved me a lot of time. 73 Darrel,aa7fv. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00394.html (7,420 bytes)

16. [TenTec] order (score: 1)
Author: Darrel <74010.2230@compuserve.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 09:31:25 -0700
I placed an order for an Omni 7 on July 8th, via the Internet. An email from Stan told me that delivery would be roughly 12 weeks. 73, Darrel, aa7fv. I placed an order for an Omni 7 on July 7th on th
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00540.html (7,621 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] order (score: 1)
Author: Darrel <74010.2230@compuserve.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 09:51:49 -0700
$36, to Arizona. I also ordered a 610 interface with it, but that's very light and small compared to the Omni 7. 73 Darrel, aa7fv. Best regards - Bry Carling I placed an order for an Omni 7 on July 8
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00542.html (8,985 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] order (score: 1)
Author: Darrel <74010.2230@compuserve.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 12:02:19 -0700
Since posting my original message this morning, about an anticipated 12 weeks delivery time for my Omni VII, I've received another email from TenTec saying that the status is now "Awaiting Shipment."
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00546.html (9,838 bytes)

19. Re: [TenTec] Brand new Omni 7 broke already (score: 1)
Author: Darrel <74010.2230@compuserve.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 09:20:46 -0700
This happened to mine too, after just a few hours of gentle use. The multi-knob froze up. TenTec arranged to have UPS pick it up to ship back to them. Apart from the shipping time both ways, they tur
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-09/msg00251.html (8,623 bytes)

20. [TenTec] GMT vs UTC (score: 1)
Author: demerson <74010.2230@compuserve.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 10:13:13 -0700
As several have pointed out, GMT is effectively the same as UTC. If we're being really pedantic, there is a subtle difference involving partial leap seconds, and the fact that the earth does not rota
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-03/msg00267.html (7,372 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu