Mail Archive Search: <+from:FSWF37A@prodigy.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:FSWF37A@prodigy.com: 55 ]

Total 55 documents matching your query.

41. [TenTec] OMNI-VI and SB-220 (score: 1): Author: FSWF37A@prodigy.com ( JAMES T BRANNIGAN); Date: Sat, 28 Jun 1997 11:48:34, -0500; Greetings, Has anyone tried to modify a Heath SB-220 to QSK with the OMNI-VI? How does TT QSK their amps? I have Rich Measures article from QST. He uses vacuum relays and a timing circut. There must; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-06/msg00271.html (6,941 bytes)
42. Audio Hum (score: 1): Author: FSWF37A@prodigy.com ( JAMES T BRANNIGAN); Date: Sun, 2 Feb 1997 11:42:17, -0500; For some time the locals have noticed a hum on my OMNI VI audio. I thought it was a ground loop from the computer, TNC, SSTV, connections. Lately it seems to be getting worse and in the past few days; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-02/msg00002.html (7,079 bytes)
43. CT and OMNI VI (score: 1): Author: FSWF37A@prodigy.com ( JAMES T BRANNIGAN); Date: Tue, 11 Feb 1997 20:50:43, -0500; Has anyone used CT ver 9 with their OMNI VI? I'm using the RS-232 port on the OMNI and I can only get some of the features to work. If I enable CdE (matrix mode) The frequency will continuously displ; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-02/msg00063.html (6,798 bytes)
44. CT9 & OMNI VI (score: 1): Author: FSWF37A@prodigy.com ( JAMES T BRANNIGAN); Date: Wed, 12 Feb 1997 20:06:22, -0500; Thanks for the responses. Let me try to clarify the problem. I have CT ver 9.27 and an OMNI VI with the latest firmware upgrade. I'm using the RS-232 port on the OMNI and I can only get some of the C; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-02/msg00071.html (7,445 bytes)
45. [TenTec] Re: [ct-user] CT & OMNI VI (score: 1): Author: FSWF37A@prodigy.com ( JAMES T BRANNIGAN); Date: Wed, 19 Feb 1997 19:45:52, -0500; Charles, Thanks a million for the advice..... Setting the baud rate to 1200 fixed everything.... It will also work at 2400 baud, at 4800 baud it starts to get flaky and forget it at 9600, where I had; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-02/msg00108.html (7,164 bytes)
46. Remote Tuning knob (score: 1): Author: FSWF37A@prodigy.com ( JAMES T BRANNIGAN); Date: Fri, 3 Jan 1997 05:10:47, -0500; I was disappointed to hear that you have discontinued production of the remote tuning knob. I would like to homebrew one for my Omni VI. Any information that you could provide (parts, schematic) woul; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-01/msg00012.html (7,055 bytes)
47. Omni VI IMD modification questions.. (score: 1): Author: FSWF37A@prodigy.com ( JAMES T BRANNIGAN); Date: Sat, 6 Jul 1996 08:29:04, -0500; I received the parts and instructions from Ten-Tec. Their comment was that the mod was simply not worth it for most hams and you would not be able to tell the difference with the parts installed. Any; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-07/msg00032.html (6,788 bytes)
48. Omni VI IMD modification questions.. (score: 1): Author: FSWF37A@prodigy.com ( JAMES T BRANNIGAN); Date: Sun, 7 Jul 1996 10:24:45, -0500; Several replies to my last post said the IMD mod should be done, because it is easy to do and it might work... I'm of the "if it ain't broke don't fix it" mold. Has anyone actually MADE the modificat; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-07/msg00036.html (6,851 bytes)
49. Omni 6 ringing filters (score: 1): Author: FSWF37A@prodigy.com ( JAMES T BRANNIGAN); Date: Sun, 7 Jul 1996 13:57:05, -0500; Art, On my OMNI VI (about 10 months old) IF/AF Board, C25 is .01 bypass from the base of Q4 to ground. Is there a C25 bypass on the collector of your Q4? Also, the mod re the pass band tuning, did TE; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-07/msg00039.html (6,933 bytes)
50. Omni VI IMD modification ... (score: 1): Author: FSWF37A@prodigy.com ( JAMES T BRANNIGAN); Date: Mon, 8 Jul 1996 20:54:25, -0500; Well, it seems that only one fellow has actually made the IMD modification.....and as much as I would like a 40m beam at 98ft. its not going to happen here..... (actually most of my 200 countries on; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-07/msg00050.html (7,347 bytes)
51. Omni 6 Upgrades (score: 1): Author: FSWF37A@prodigy.com ( JAMES T BRANNIGAN); Date: Tue, 9 Jul 1996 20:23:03, -0500; Dalton, I have the chip upgrade in my Omni6 and have not experienced any problems. Jim, WB2TPS; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-07/msg00056.html (6,284 bytes)
52. Omni VI IMD modification ... (score: 1): Author: FSWF37A@prodigy.com ( JAMES T BRANNIGAN); Date: Tue, 9 Jul 1996 20:28:23, -0500; Larry, My OMNI VI is about 10 months old. The 500kc filter rings like all get out... The 500 kc filter in the "NAR" position is not nearly as bad... I would like to try the 250 filter, but not until; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-07/msg00057.html (6,929 bytes)
53. OMNI VI noise blanker (score: 1): Author: FSWF37A@prodigy.com ( JAMES T BRANNIGAN); Date: Fri, 21 Jun 1996 19:22:15, -0500; Hi Knut, At first I was not happy with the noise blanket on the Omni6, Then I realized that the effect was more subtle than other noise blankers that I was used to. While the noise blanker does not r; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-06/msg00052.html (6,815 bytes)
54. IMD (score: 1): Author: FSWF37A@prodigy.com ( JAMES T BRANNIGAN); Date: Fri, 3 May 1996 21:11:53, -0500; I ordered the firm ware up grade for the OMNI 6 and while on the phone asked for the IMD upgrade. The letter, dated 10/94, said that they didn't think that the IMD upgrade was necessary or would be n; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-05/msg00011.html (6,322 bytes)
55. Omni Lineage (score: 1): Author: FSWF37A@prodigy.com ( JAMES T BRANNIGAN); Date: Fri, 17 May 1996 13:25:18, -0500; Hi John, For many years I used separate Collins receivers for split DX. The split freq function on the OMNI VI is much better. One button to toggle and tune. The new firm ware allows you to lock one; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-05/msg00035.html (6,964 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 55
Page: [1] [2] [3]