Mail Archive Search: <+from:RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net>

Results:

References: [ +from:RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net: 112 ]

Total 112 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Simultaneous Keying Question (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2001 21:30:19 -0700; Multiple transmitters and close coupled antennas is a sure formula for trouble. Some type of isolation, either physical by distancing antennas, or electrical by an isolator will most likely be requir; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-09/msg00022.html (12,343 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Fw: Loud Hum w/Paragon I & 961 (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 22:03:09 -0700; This could be a vibration between the steel bottom panel and the transformer too. I'd suggest making sure "all" hardware is tight. Mine doesn't humm at all. Line voltage is normally 123 VAC to 128 VA; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-09/msg00152.html (9,633 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Tentec Hamfest (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2001 20:54:11 -0700; In going through my archives I found the following announcement. Hope you have the dates marked and plan to attend. 73 Bob K4TAX; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-08/msg00031.html (6,596 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Omni VI+ Zipper Noise (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 22:27:30 -0700; To those that have asked, I'll let the cat out of the bag and hope that Paul at Tentec won't wring my neck the next time I see him. Sorry to brag Paul, but you guys do great work and go to great leng; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-08/msg00062.html (7,730 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Passband/ Omni 6+ (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001 14:52:52 -0700; I've followed this discussion a bit over the last couple of days. Several times I've turn around and listened to my Omni VI+ with both the normal filters and with the 1.8KHz filters in the 9 MHz and; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-08/msg00170.html (9,819 bytes)
6. [TenTec] 1220 "birdies" revisited (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 07:22:04 -0700; Guys: A couple of things to check. Are the birdies stable in frequency? or do they "move around". Are they there with a dummy load and move or go away when the load is removed. If so, the RF amp is m; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-08/msg00178.html (9,555 bytes)
7. [TenTec] HF Band CW Praactice (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 14:59:02 -0700; Gee, it seems that a lot of people don't have enough to do. Contact me and I'll off-load some of my projects on you. CW, SSB or AM, take your pick. I work everything from 160M to the microwave region; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-08/msg00200.html (12,320 bytes)
8. [TenTec] [Fwd: PSK31 Stuff (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 18:09:54 -0700; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --4196302F69CB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit You've ask. Here's an answer. 73 Bob K4TAX --4196302F69CB Conten; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-08/msg00220.html (40,041 bytes)
9. [TenTec] Weird Jupiter Xmit Problem (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2001 23:00:39 -0700; Nate: I do agree regarding Tentec radios performance and service. At the same time, one would expect that radios, especially ones that generate RF, should be able to operate in a reasonable RF enviro; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-07/msg00033.html (13,831 bytes)
10. [TenTec] Weird Jupiter Xmit Problem (caution - metadiscussion) (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 20:34:09 -0700; Now here's a fellow that knows how to deal with RF. 73 Bob K4TAX -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/tentec Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contest; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-07/msg00046.html (9,015 bytes)
11. [TenTec] Re: OMNI 6+ (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2001 22:25:03 -0700; Don & TENTEC List: Well I started this so I best finish it. I've had several direct inquiries about this. I suffered with RF getting into the audio of my Paragon I. Admittingly the operating position; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-07/msg00056.html (9,159 bytes)
12. [TenTec] Re: OMNI 6+ (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 09:17:32 -0700; Jim; cc: Tentec list Sounds like you have all the latest mods to improve the Omni VI+. Those have been done to mine as well and I'm pleased with the results. As to the RF issues. I haven't had any pr; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-07/msg00060.html (15,181 bytes)
13. [TenTec] Keyer For Sale (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 18:45:25 -0700; To All: I have a Tentec 605 keyer that I no longer use or need. (It's been replaced with a paddle for the OMNI VI+.) This keyer is in excellent (like new) condition and has original documentation. As; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-07/msg00070.html (6,602 bytes)
14. [TenTec] Omni VI+ vs Icom 756-Pro (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2001 08:13:52 -0700; While the PRO is good, I find that I can work a DX station on the Omni VI+ while I'm trying to get the whistles to blow and the bells to ring on the PRO. In the mean time, with the OMNI, I'm off work; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00041.html (11,013 bytes)
15. [TenTec] Omni VI+ vs Icom 756-Pro (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2001 22:05:15 -0700; Thats exactly why I have a both a 1.8KHz SSB filter and a 500 Hz CW filter in the high IF on the Omni VI+. It's a killer of a receiver with also a 1.8KHz SSB in the low IF, a 500 Hz and 250Hz CW filt; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00071.html (9,138 bytes)
16. [TenTec] RF (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2001 22:48:22 -0700; things. I'd think some additional RF susceptibility testing would be worth while. 73 Bob K4TAX -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/tentec Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative r; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00095.html (7,958 bytes)
17. [TenTec] TT 962 pwr slpy (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 20:38:13 -0700; I run a hard ground from the rig, the tuner, the amp to the Tentec PSU. No problems here. Oh yes, #10 AWG LCOF wire with lugs crimped AND soldered. 73 Bob K4TAX -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.c; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00120.html (8,120 bytes)
18. [TenTec] Model 216 Filter For Sale (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 09:04:43 -0700; Item for sale: I have a no-longer-needed Tentec model 216 filter for sale. This is a 500 Hz 6 pole for FSK/RTTY which is used in the 9 MHz IF. Check or MO for $60 will get it shipped to you. 73 Bob K; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00145.html (6,632 bytes)
19. [TenTec] New IF-DSP HF QRP transceiver (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 23:39:24 -0700; Now folks...... go back and read Scotts message. It was clear and correct English as I recall. Mine said "Suggestions can be emailed to sales@tentec.com, put "QRP Rig Suggestions" on the subject line; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00168.html (7,742 bytes)
20. [TenTec] Kudos to TT (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:03:22 -0700; BRAVO!!! Especially for the folks at Tentec. 73 Bob K4TAX -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/tentec Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-06/msg00175.html (7,680 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]