Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:Rick@dj0ip.de: 3271 ]

Total 3271 documents matching your query.

181. Re: [TenTec] CW OPERATION WITH ANAN-10 AND TEN TEC 418 (score: 1)
Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 22:33:46 +0200
It's not, Jim. 17mS is just fine. Back in the 70s when I worked in the lab at Rhode und Schwarz, we did testing with QRP transceivers and several amps, and eventually produced a time sequencer for ke
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-08/msg00101.html (9,745 bytes)

182. Re: [TenTec] notch filter for Eagle? (score: 1)
Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 09:26:47 +0200
Michael, perhaps you can explain to us why that disappoints you. If it worked on CW, you would not be able to work CW when it's on. And what on earth do you need it for on FM? 73 Rick, DJ0IP My manua
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-07/msg00073.html (14,490 bytes)

183. Re: [TenTec] notch filter for Eagle? (score: 1)
Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 09:30:13 +0200
You guys are all out in right field. No radio's auto notch filter works in CW mode. They cannot distinguish between the useful tone and the disturbing tone. And yes, in that case, a manual notch filt
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-07/msg00074.html (13,911 bytes)

184. Re: [TenTec] notch filter for Eagle? (score: 1)
Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 14:08:59 +0200
7300? 7600? Icom is selling the older radios at dumping prices because everybody wants the new stuff (without manual notch filter). I guess I should have said "every radio designed within the past 5
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-07/msg00077.html (15,778 bytes)

185. Re: [TenTec] notch filter for Eagle? (score: 1)
Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 15:51:05 +0200
Sri Ernie, I didn't mean everyone on the list, just those who say the notch Eagle's filter is worthless and especially those who think an auto notch filter should work in CW mode. The days of manual
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-07/msg00079.html (17,550 bytes)

186. Re: [TenTec] notch filter for Eagle? (score: 1)
Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 16:36:04 +0200
Gary, Your Pro 2 of course is ancient history now. Was a great radio in its day. Manual notch filters are fine on CW because "we" use our brain to notch the disturbance and not the desired frequency.
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-07/msg00084.html (19,078 bytes)

187. Re: [TenTec] notch filter for Eagle? (score: 1)
Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 17:05:30 +0200
Gary, you are covering your "assets", aren't you. Once you say "to me", END of discussion - hi. The notch filter outside of the AGC loop can be very affective as long as the disturbing carrier is wea
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-07/msg00091.html (12,399 bytes)

188. Re: [TenTec] notch filter for Eagle? (score: 1)
Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 17:15:54 +0200
Mike, You are right. No auto-notch can replace the tunable manual notch on CW. However if you run the 300 Hz roofing filter on the Eagle and crank its passband filter down to 100 Hz, in most cases yo
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-07/msg00093.html (20,146 bytes)

189. Re: [TenTec] CAT com port troubles over (I hope) (score: 1)
Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 17:18:27 +0200
It sounds to me like you have some RF in the shack, Mike. Are you using a good RF Choke between your antenna and your Eagle? I use 3; one inside the house at the rig, one outside the house, and one h
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-07/msg00094.html (8,272 bytes)

190. Re: [TenTec] notch filter for Eagle? (score: 1)
Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 17:20:30 +0200
My answer: ... Never in a contest ... Never in CW since I have an auto-notch ... Occasionally on SSB rag chew it is a big help 73 Rick, DJ0IP --Original Message-- From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-07/msg00095.html (12,711 bytes)

191. Re: [TenTec] notch filter for Eagle? (score: 1)
Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 17:25:35 +0200
New 7600's are going for dumping prices over here. Everyone is waiting on the 7610. (if I win the lottery . . . ) Our accountant at Spiderbeam co-owns a vinyl record shop and his business is booming,
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-07/msg00096.html (11,315 bytes)

192. Re: [TenTec] notch filter for Eagle? (score: 1)
Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 23:45:37 +0200
Now that's super, Darrell! I haven't used one yet, only looked at it at the ham fest in Friedrichshafen. I didn't see the manual notch. It's beginning to look like the 7300 is the only radio left out
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-07/msg00109.html (12,659 bytes)

193. Re: [TenTec] notch filter for Eagle? (score: 1)
Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 23:54:46 +0200
Dave, That is only because Rob Sherwood worked long and hard on Ten-Tec and FLEX to fix their problems. When they originally shipped, neither were any good at blanking electric fences. We all owe Rob
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-07/msg00110.html (20,995 bytes)

194. Re: [TenTec] notch filter for Eagle? (score: 1)
Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 00:03:10 +0200
Carl, that was about the noise blanker, not the notch filter. When all of the radios switched to DSP noise blankers, they ALL lost to ability to cope with short pulse noises. Rob, who was plagued by
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-07/msg00112.html (24,313 bytes)

195. Re: [TenTec] notch filter for Eagle? (score: 1)
Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 08:10:18 +0200
A.M.E.N. IT IS TIME TO CLEAN UP OUR FILTHY TRANSMITTERS! 73 Rick, DJ0IP --Original Message-- From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Greg S via TenTec Sent: Friday, July 21,
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-07/msg00122.html (21,422 bytes)

196. Re: [TenTec] notch filter for Eagle? (score: 1)
Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 08:19:31 +0200
Darell, you are spot on in your description. I will add that Scott (W4PA) offers an INRAD option to the 7300 that enables you to insert a preselector... And there is a guy in Greece producing a prese
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-07/msg00123.html (16,415 bytes)

197. Re: [TenTec] notch filter for Eagle? (score: 1)
Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 08:33:33 +0200
I was operating 40m SSB recently and had a disturbing dual-tone carrier come up on my frequency. The two tones were about 800 Hz and 600 Hz, +/-, and a good S9. I pushed the notch button on my SDR tr
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-07/msg00124.html (29,835 bytes)

198. Re: [TenTec] notch filter for Eagle? (score: 1)
Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 16:12:09 +0200
I don't recall saying anything about "Eagle". I was using an $800 SDR QRP transceiver. YES, the S-Meter dropped. All traces of the disturbing signal completely vanished. In CW I only need the notch a
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-07/msg00126.html (33,116 bytes)

199. Re: [TenTec] notch filter for Eagle? (score: 1)
Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 17:37:49 +0200
Gary, We don't all have the same likes, wants and needs. There is no one-size fits all. The only reason I joined the thread was because a couple of people dinged the Eagle's auto-notcher for not work
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-07/msg00128.html (38,454 bytes)

200. Re: [TenTec] notch filter for Eagle? (score: 1)
Author: "rick@dj0ip.de" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2017 00:13:05 +0200
Oh I agree, Darrell. I just would have preferred to pay $100 more and have the pre-selection built-in. But since the whole world doesn't need it, just Europe, I understand why they did it the way the
/archives//html/TenTec/2017-07/msg00138.html (19,935 bytes)

Current List: 181 - 200
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu