Mail Archive Search: <+from:Rsoifer@aol.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:Rsoifer@aol.com: 310 ]

Total 310 documents matching your query.

221. Re: [TenTec] OII SWR Indication Off on 10 m (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2012 18:59:25 -0500 (EST); Funny, when I tried it with Orion II v3.027 I got 1.0 in the Tune position and 1.4 with full output, on 28.500. 73 Ray W2RS _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00112.html (7,222 bytes)
222. Re: [TenTec] OII SWR Indication Off on 10 m (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 08:42:54 -0500 (EST); Ah, you're using the internal tuner. I don't have one. Maybe it's a tuner issue? 73 Ray W2RS _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.con; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00123.html (7,266 bytes)
223. Re: [TenTec] OII SWR Indication Off on 10 m (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 12:59:32 -0500 (EST); Actually, the O II SWR sensor was never that accurate anyway, compared to a good external wattmeter. The O II SWR reading is also dependent on the power level, i.e., it reads higher at full output th; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00127.html (8,580 bytes)
224. Re: [TenTec] Orion and RTTY (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 14:37:38 -0500 (EST); I'm using the US Interface Navigator with my 566. Works great on RTTY in FSK with MMTTY. It should work with the 565 too. 73 Ray W2RS _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing li; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00191.html (7,174 bytes)
225. Re: [TenTec] 600 Meters, anyone? (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:14:18 -0500 (EST); Probably as soon as MFJ comes out with a compact 600-meter antenna :-) 73 Ray W2RS _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.co; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00222.html (6,550 bytes)
226. Re: [TenTec] 600 Meters, anyone? (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 09:10:19 -0500 (EST); I imagine most of the serious operaton will probaly be QRSS. Some version of JT65 might work too, but the present ones consume too much bandwidth. 73 Ray W2RS ________________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00274.html (7,789 bytes)
227. Re: [TenTec] 600 Meters, anyone? (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 14:20:22 -0500 (EST); I think we're mainly preaching to the choir here about upgrading to Extra, but the present exam is so easy that we have some Extras in our local club who passed it without ever being on the air, and; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00305.html (8,538 bytes)
228. Re: [TenTec] extra whining (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 14:53:49 -0500 (EST); I'm not suggesting that they toughen the exam, only that the present one is so easy that anyone who wants the Extra privileges can pass it if he wants to. Jim and I aren't better than you for having; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00307.html (6,742 bytes)
229. Re: [TenTec] adding xtal filter to the Orion (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:30:33 -0500 (EST); That's basically what EMEers do with their sequencers, etc., to protect their external preamps, but they don't need QSK. There still may be some high-speed switching solution that I'm not aware of. 7; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00633.html (8,693 bytes)
230. Re: [TenTec] adding xtal filter to the Orion (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:49:39 -0500 (EST); You're probably right, Barry. Let's see what the T-T guys come up with. 73 Ray _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/ma; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00635.html (8,073 bytes)
231. [TenTec] 566 v3.028 (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 20:11:14 -0400 (EDT); Hi John, I'm quite pleased with v3.028 on CW, especially the SAF. I still have an issue with it on SSB, namely the performance with the 707 mic. My 707 worked well with v2.041XT, but with v3.028 I ha; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00030.html (7,140 bytes)
232. Re: [TenTec] 566 v3.028 (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 09:14:10 -0400 (EDT); Thanks for the info guys, but RF feedback is only part of the problem. There is still audio distortion caused by having to run the mic input and H/W mic gain at too high a level (with the 707 mic). I; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00043.html (7,215 bytes)
233. [TenTec] Orion II settings for 706 mic (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 13:59:20 -0400 (EDT); FYI, here are the settings I've evolved for the 706 electret mic and v3.028: H/W Mic gain 3.0 dB Front panel mic gain 40 TX EQ 0 dB for normal use, -5 dB for pileups SP no higher than 4; there's stil; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00046.html (7,255 bytes)
234. Re: [TenTec] 566 v3.028 (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 15:02:34 -0400 (EDT); I hear you, but the 707 worked well under v2 firmware without the need for a preamp. The Orion II's dynamic range was wide enough to handle the gain that the 707 requires. It appears that the dynamic; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00050.html (7,982 bytes)
235. Re: [TenTec] 566 v3.028 (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 17:38:53 -0400 (EDT); Barry, You're right. I tried Chris's settings on 160 and they worked fine. On 10, distortion. 73 Ray W2RSi _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com ht; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00060.html (7,722 bytes)
236. Re: [TenTec] 566 v3.028 (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 08:45:35 -0400 (EDT); The 707 is a dynamic desk mic. not a handheld. 73 Ray W2RS _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tente; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00068.html (7,959 bytes)
237. Re: [TenTec] 566 v3.028 spot versus SAF (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 08:55:23 -0400 (EDT); As best I can tell by ear, the difference between my (566 v3.028) spot and SAF is 2 Hz. That is with SPOT at 350 Hz, STEP at 1 Hz and SAF W at 10 Hz. 73 Ray W2RS _____________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00070.html (7,221 bytes)
238. Re: [TenTec] Orion II settings for 706 mic (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 10:06:08 -0400 (EDT); Generally , but not always. The Collins MM-1 dynamic hand-held mic that I use with my KWM-2 is rated at -48 dB, which is higher than the T-T 706 electret (-52 dB). The T-T 707 dynamic desk mic, howev; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00073.html (8,373 bytes)
239. Re: [TenTec] Orion II settings for 706 mic (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 10:13:08 -0400 (EDT); Because the 707 sounds great if the radio can accommodate it. It worked fine witfh the Orion II v2 firmware, but there seems to be a problem with v3. Hopefullly the T-T guys can sort it out. 73 Ray W; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00075.html (8,311 bytes)
240. Re: [TenTec] Orion II settings for 706 mic (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 10:51:13 -0400 (EDT); Lee, Sorry I can't help. I don't have a Heil Goldline. 73 Ray W2RS _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listin; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00077.html (7,966 bytes)

Current List: 221 - 240
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16]