Mail Archive Search: <+from:Rsoifer@aol.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:Rsoifer@aol.com: 310 ]

Total 310 documents matching your query.

301. Re: [TenTec] Firmware progress update posted.... (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:43:41 EST; Scott, If you're reading this, does your latest status post mean that the O II firmware will be released when it is ready, or will it still be held up while the Orion version is being tested? 73 Ray; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-11/msg00162.html (7,991 bytes)
302. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Fan Disappointment.... (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:44:48 EST; I agree -- unless you're a VERY serious contester. :) Which, for the record, I'm not. I am, however, a serious DXer, on CW and a little RTTY. I hardly ever operate phone. It may seem strange to some; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-11/msg00164.html (10,042 bytes)
303. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Fan Disappointment.... (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:29:42 EST; Hi Ron, Thanks for the info. I'll bear it in mind. In my experience as a CW DXer, the best approach is not to zero-beat the last station worked, unless you have a rock-crushing signal (which I don't); /archives//html/TenTec/2008-11/msg00170.html (12,899 bytes)
304. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Fan Disappointment.... (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:43:13 EST; Jim, I feel for you! Fortunately, being 25 miles south of Tucson I rarely encounter strong local signals, except for one guy on 160 with key clicks who shall be nameless. He isn't running T-T or Elec; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-11/msg00171.html (10,344 bytes)
305. Re: [TenTec] Inflation (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 08:59:52 EDT; Another look: According to the westegg calculator (the more conservative of the two Joel mentions, the KWM-2/PM-2 combination that I bought in 1962 for $1300 would be $8821 in 2007, nearly twice the; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-09/msg00305.html (7,050 bytes)
306. Re: [TenTec] Band Scopes, Engineers, Firmware, Etc. (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 20:17:00 EDT; Kim, My sentiments exactly. Maybe someone with one of those better band scopes can explain why it's needed and worth paying for, but I've had my O II for three years and find its sweep function usefu; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00329.html (9,176 bytes)
307. Re: [TenTec] Band Scopes (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:15:54 EDT; Thanks, Charles. That's helpful info, to me anyway. I consider myself a serious DXer but, these days, only a casual contester (I fool around in them, generally S&P style, for a few hours at a time bu; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00352.html (8,634 bytes)
308. Re: [TenTec] Band Scopes (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 10:52:28 EDT; Hi Bob, Yes, I've checked out the reviews, etc., of the K3, as have many on this list. It's not a simple process, because of the way Elecraft has chosen to market it: there is the bare-bones radio an; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00367.html (8,898 bytes)
309. Re: [TenTec] Band Scopes (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 15:59:39 EDT; Hi Barry, Yes, you're right. The K3 has a better sub receiver (for amateur band use) than the Orion or O II. I had forgotten about that, probably because all I ever use the sub receiver for, besides; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00370.html (8,811 bytes)
310. Re: [TenTec] Bye RFSquared (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 13:30:52 EDT; Hi all, Despite Scott's post last week that the Argonaut V has been discontinued, it still appears with the current models and not in the archive. No doubt an oversight. 73 Ray W2RS ** It's only a de; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00461.html (8,263 bytes)

Current List: 301 - 310
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16]