Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:aa4nu@ix.netcom.com: 141 ]

Total 141 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [TenTec] TenTec Orion Reliability (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:01:14 -0500
Certainly each person is entitled to their own "my belief", but such is not an indication of any accuracy nor truth in the matter ... ONE weekend without problems is what I recall Tom stated. ONE we
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00844.html (10,351 bytes)

62. Re: [TenTec] new TenTec software 3.170 (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 11:13:44 -0500
Tommy, How close does a "below 5ms" setting approach the threshold as to the Orion having 'clicks'? Seems like you, or others have posted that the Orion can/does/will also 'click' with the lower set
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00683.html (7,714 bytes)

63. Re: [TenTec] 80m antenna suggestion (score: 1)
Author: aa4nu@ix.netcom.com
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 09:30:20 -0600 (GMT-06:00)
Chris, purchase yourself a copy of ON4UN's LowBand DXing book. It has TONS of ideas for you to consider for your limited space. Also, check out the article by N4KG in the May 1994 QST who describes
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00293.html (9,730 bytes)

64. Re: [TenTec] 80m antenna suggestion (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 22:57:49 -0600
I pulled the date off of the ARRL site ... <on page 5 of 9 when you search for N4KG> "ARRLWeb: ARRL Periodicals Index Search ... QST 45 Simple, Effective Elevated Ground-Plane Antennas Keywords: ANT
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00344.html (10,048 bytes)

65. Re: [TenTec] 80m antenna suggestion (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 13:30:18 -0600
Agree ... Good summary ... Disagree ... Example? Try and use a 20m yagi ... on 10m ... while the 20m yagi is 2x larger ... it's performance will be much less. Summary ... To quote N4KG ... "bigger a
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00370.html (8,926 bytes)

66. Re: [TenTec] 80 meter loops (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 21:49:57 -0600
Not so fast ... as in try using a 20m dipole on 10m? Twice the 'area' ... yet ... NOT twice the performance. Slow down guys ... some of you may be exceeding the "speed of physics" here. B-) <Note th
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00457.html (9,454 bytes)

67. Re: [TenTec] 80 meter loops (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 20:33:26 -0600
Your statement was capture area ... so why doesn't the 20m dipole work twice as well on 10m? <even if matched?> There's reasons why I don't use my 80m 4x array on 40m, despite it having more 'captur
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00575.html (10,571 bytes)

68. Re: [TenTec] 80 meter loops (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 22:17:03 -0600
Getting into the technical is not a problem ... it's one of the parts of the hobby I still enjoy even after all these years. B-) OK ... now you are using effective area, before some were saying that
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00580.html (14,025 bytes)

69. [TenTec] Ron Lee AGC System (Omni C's "pop" AGC) (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 22:58:51 -0600
What KB3MM posts is true ... and NOT certainly old wives fare. That "pop" was one of the reasons the Omni C left the desk here. Here's some background as to the problem and a possible solution. http:
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00696.html (7,384 bytes)

70. Re: [TenTec] Orion vs. Yaesu FT-1000D (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 14:16:32 -0600
Me thinks your "usually accurate memory" needs a rest ... B-) Actually the 940's reign on top was not so great ... it offered PC control over the 930s ... but introduced "phase noise" ... The IC765
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00774.html (9,891 bytes)

71. Re: [TenTec] Future Tentec gear (score: 1)
Author: aa4nu@ix.netcom.com
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 19:03:06 -0600 (GMT-06:00)
It must be close to Christmas ... for AC5E, K5KVH, and AA4NU to be in agreement ... B-) Yes, this change is coming to the automotive industry ... many designs are already done ... In fact, there's b
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00200.html (8,705 bytes)

72. Re: [TenTec] Re: Orion IP2 numbers (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 22:20:18 -0600
Maybe? ... as in wonder if they are using any additional EXTERNAL bandpass filters as part of the overall station design there too? Over the years the Bavarian group have published several such arti
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00511.html (9,124 bytes)

73. Re: [TenTec] Re: Orion IP2 numbers (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 16:55:30 -0600
EXCELLENT ... and TU for the clarification! Season's Greetings, 73 Billy AA4NU
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00553.html (8,470 bytes)

74. Re: [TenTec] Orion freezes due to RFI?? (score: 1)
Author: aa4nu@ix.netcom.com
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 08:08:38 -0600 (GMT-06:00)
Good point ... except the problems seem to be occuring on RCVE mainly ... not in the XMIT mode ... TenTec's do seem to be more prone to RFI problems <... read the archives>. Here's to hoping ALL the
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00566.html (9,131 bytes)

75. [TenTec] Orion Tuning Rates & Other Thoughts (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2003 21:07:44 -0600
Orion Tuning Rates ... I spent some time with the Orion at TenTec this week ... and the FIRST thing I noticed when on CW was the "stepping" ... it sounded like the old Icom R-70 ... step, step, step
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00997.html (12,884 bytes)

76. Re: [TenTec] Headphone clicks (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2003 22:55:46 -0600
If 32 ohms is the common 'standard' fine ... if not then this is a design issue ... and a tragic oversight which leads to discussions such as this ... if 'X' ohms is the more common 'standard' found
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01002.html (10,596 bytes)

77. Re: [TenTec] No ALC cable to AMP? (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 23:24:52 -0600
Ditto on the internal ALC found in most amps ... driving a tube based amp with a solid state driver ... it's been found better to use different ALC loops ... To underscore Grant's key point ... set
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01267.html (7,947 bytes)

78. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Archive (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2003 20:20:54 -0600
Rob, Good question. You can find them via the link at the bottom of any TT email: Which leads to http://dayton.akorn.net/pipermail/tentec/ 73 and have a great evening there. Billy AA4NU
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00013.html (7,445 bytes)

79. Re: [TenTec] CW (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 18:32:36 -0600
One of the guest ops here, brings his own keyboard for each rig when he operates the CW contests from here. He uses those special "split key arrangement" Microsoft types. We use TR, NA, and Writelog
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00192.html (8,114 bytes)

80. Re: [TenTec] Orion in Contests (score: 1)
Author: "Billy Cox" <aa4nu@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 17:33:29 -0600
I love posts like this ... helps me to understand how urban legions get their mysterious beginnings ... "substantial funding" ... WOW. Hey ... is it true that TenTec is really owned by Yaesu too? B-
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00399.html (10,051 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]
This search system is powered by Namazu