Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ac5aa@juno.com: 470 ]

Total 470 documents matching your query.

361. Re: [TenTec] tighter filter for Jupiter (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 19:35:47 -0600
Pick up an old Timewave DSP-9 - remarkably good on CW and will give you 100, 200, or 500 Hz on CW (and 1.8, 2.4 and 3.1 kHz on SSB, but who cares about that mode?). :-) 73, Duane -- Duane Calvin, AC5
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00249.html (10,772 bytes)

362. Re: [TenTec] tighter filter for Jupiter (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 09:47:06 -0600
Hmm, standard measurement would say it should be 300 Hz at the 6 dB down point, and then wherever it measures at 60 dB down would give you the shape factor (how vertical the skirts are.) Have you sen
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00264.html (9,668 bytes)

363. Re: [TenTec] Information (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 23:11:57 -0600
Isn't it kinda "fun" that he waits for the rig to go out of production before posting the numbers. He's had at least seven years to make measurements. But then those of us who have been using them al
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00345.html (9,250 bytes)

364. Re: [TenTec] eHam (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 23:34:49 -0600
Just rejoined the reflector since I ordered my Orion (still wondering whether to keep or sell the Omni VI+). Now I remember why I dropped my subscription earlier. The noise level on here is unbelieva
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00346.html (7,368 bytes)

365. Re: [TenTec] Difference between 238 and 238A tuners (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 18:30:10 -0600
Because the original 238 had the sliderule dial, while the later ones have the turns counter dial. 73, Duane -- Duane Calvin, AC5AA Austin, Texas http://home.austin.rr.com/ac5aa
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00446.html (9,863 bytes)

366. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6 clock problem (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 13:08:28 -0600
Mike, Give the techs at TT a call - they've probably seen this before. 73, Duane Duane Calvin, AC5AA Austin, Texas
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00561.html (7,952 bytes)

367. Re: [TenTec] ditsnbits (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 13:22:17 -0600
Here's a somewhat apocryphal story. About 10 years ago, maybe longer, when IBM was producing top quality PC's and losing in the marketplace to Dell who was still trying to get their quality up, there
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00562.html (8,315 bytes)

368. Re: [TenTec] ditsnbits auto-responder (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 13:40:45 -0600
Tom, That's surely part of it. But the other part of it is the military and gov't radios they do on contract. If they were trying to stay in business just on their ham radio income, I think they woul
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00609.html (10,734 bytes)

369. Re: [TenTec] ditsnbits auto-responder (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:00:07 -0600
Sorry guys and gals - this "reply to the reflector" bites me every time. This was intended to be a private response, not a public one. Sigh . . . 73, Duane Duane Calvin, AC5AA Austin, Texas
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00616.html (11,961 bytes)

370. Re: [TenTec] ditsnbits auto-responder (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:13:18 -0600
Apologies, again. My screw-up. What made sense for a private note doesn't make sense in the cold, harsh light of public scrutiny! I won't even try to defend it other than to say I was employing hyper
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00617.html (10,162 bytes)

371. Re: [TenTec] The Great Debate (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 11:02:18 -0600
Jeff, I had the opportunity to use an Orion in my shack for a few weeks last fall. When it left, I went back to my wonderful Omni VI+ and I said "Yay, powers on immediately, and is so simple to opera
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00634.html (8,266 bytes)

372. Re: [TenTec] BPL Update (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 10:16:00 -0600
You should think about how a power company, who probably already does a poor job of responding to noise complaints today is going to respond to complaints about a completely new technology (to them)
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00720.html (13,188 bytes)

373. Re: [TenTec] RE: New Titan-3 (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 09:43:30 -0600
Not sure which Duane you're addressing, but since the other one is more of a software guy, I'll guess you mean me (!). Yes, the method you suggest is the correct one for the Centurion (and most amps)
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00048.html (8,044 bytes)

374. Re: [TenTec] Orion Expanded Test Report (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:42:00 -0600
Michael, Many thanks for keeping the TT reflector updated on this information. As I'm sure you've already seen, we can be a feisty (rabid?) bunch! But, at least we're all enthusiasts. 73, Duane AC5AA
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00405.html (9,674 bytes)

375. Re: [TenTec] Here We Go Again (was Spectrum Hogs) (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 15:10:32 -0600
Guys & Gals - really, "David N Force"?? This guy was just trolling. Let's not get hooked again. 73, Duane Duane Calvin, AC5AA Austin, Texas
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00722.html (10,102 bytes)

376. Re: [TenTec] warming up of tubes (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 15:15:27 -0600
Don't know what the accepted practice is, but I've fired up with the cathodes on for about 5 seconds. No ill effects observed. 73, Duane Duane Calvin, AC5AA Austin, Texas
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00723.html (7,977 bytes)

377. Re: [TenTec] RE: Orion Expanded Report (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 22:47:46 -0600
Isn't the K2 DSP done at the audio stage, not at an IF? Seems if this is the case it will add little or nothing to dynamic range or IMD discussions. 73, Duane -- Duane Calvin, AC5AA Austin, Texas htt
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00901.html (11,977 bytes)

378. Re: [TenTec] TT Orion: Also SEMI-BK-IN possible ? (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 21:19:54 -0600
Now I remember why I continually discontinue my subscription to this reflector. I'll come back later and hope things get a bit more positive in a while..... 73, Duane C. AC5AA -- Duane Calvin, AC5AA
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01174.html (9,529 bytes)

379. Re: [TenTec] Orion TX Audio: "Fuzz" (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2003 14:00:26 -0600
Now you're making me suspicous - doesn't Scott play in a band? Hmmm...... 73, Duane -- Duane Calvin, AC5AA Austin, Texas http://home.austin.rr.com/ac5aa
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00027.html (8,187 bytes)

380. Re: [TenTec] centurion mod made easier ! (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2003 14:17:06 -0600
John, If you're not sure, and if no one here responds who has done this mod, I'd suggest waiting until Monday and calling TT's techs. They will be happy to make it clear what they are describing. 73,
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00028.html (8,914 bytes)

Current List: 361 - 380
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu