Isn't it kinda "fun" that he waits for the rig to go out of production
before posting the numbers. He's had at least seven years to make
measurements. But then those of us who have been using them all that
time already knew this.... (it's also interesting none of the competing
ICOM's or Yaesu's are in the list)
73, Duane
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 18:41:50 -0600 Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX
<RMcGraw@Blomand.Net> writes:
> Good information posted here.
>
> Thanks
>
> 73
> Bob, K4TAX
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Pete Juliano" <jessystems@cablespeed.com>
> To: "TenTec Users" <tentec@contesting.com>
> Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 9:41 AM
> Subject: [TenTec] Information
>
>
> Hi Ten Tec Users,
>
> Just for information.
>
> I happened to be looking at Sherwood Engineering www.sherweng.com
> website
> under the item Receiver Test Data. The table looks as if it was
> just
> updated on 2/27 and has some interesting new data relative to the
> Ten Tec
> Omni 6+ and the K2.
>
> I believe the test data is sorted on the last column which is
> Dynamic Range
> Narrow Spaced. If this is the case, then from this aspect, the Omni
> 6+
> (based on their measurements) has some great specs. (Those with
> R390A's
> should feel good too.)
>
> 73's
> Pete W6JFR
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>
--------------------------------------
Duane Calvin, AC5AA
Austin, Texas
http://home.austin.rr.com/ac5aa
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|