Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:aldermant@alltel.net: 641 ]

Total 641 documents matching your query.

201. Re: [TenTec] Orion AUX out audio question (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 05:48:37 -0500
Page 28 of the manual states " Pin 4 is left side audio output. This output is line level...." insinuating the audio is a fixed level, however it is not. If you have the audio menu LEFT set to either
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00902.html (9,978 bytes)

202. Re: [TenTec] Orion AUX out audio question (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 10:15:34 -0500
Hi Martin, This is strange. Just checked mine again. Put the audio menu Left = Sub and can vary the left aux output by using the SubRx AF control. Put Left = MAIN or BOTH and vary the MAIN AF output
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00909.html (11,159 bytes)

203. Re: [TenTec] RE: Orion AUX out audio question (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 11:41:49 -0500
Actually Ten Tec request all bug reports should go direct to ditsnbits via their direct email address. About the only Ten Tec folks who monitor this reflector are the sales guys. Can't really blame t
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00912.html (10,068 bytes)

204. Re: [TenTec] Orion AUX out audio question (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 18:53:04 -0500
Naw..there is no incentives one gets from doing beta testing. You just do it because you wanna try to help out. BTW, anyone with an Orion can ask to become a firmware beta tester...just apply through
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00925.html (13,440 bytes)

205. Re: [TenTec] Orion Warranty (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 16:44:53 -0500
The bottom line is a control program should be an 'addition to' a radio, but not 'in place of' parts of a radio. I think a lot of us much rather utilize the radio rather than play with a computer. I
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00943.html (11,593 bytes)

206. Re: [TenTec] RIT encoder (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 16:51:10 -0500
Why is it that when a person points out a problem with a Ten Tec radio that it is labeled as 'bashing TT'? I'm sure when someone points out a problem, their intent is not to bash Ten Tec, it is more
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00945.html (10,841 bytes)

207. Re: [TenTec] Advantages of computer control for s DX'er (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 17:31:12 -0500
There is no reason to get defensive about your program, I did not mention any specific program by name. The N4PY program is known to be excellent plus add some excellent capability to the Orion. Most
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00950.html (14,826 bytes)

208. Re: [TenTec] Orion AUX out audio question (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 17:44:11 -0500
Mark, That is VERY strange. I just tested what you said and you are correct! Something I had not noticed before. If you are using AUX I/O Left aux audio output, plug in the headphones and mute the MA
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00951.html (10,568 bytes)

209. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec and Years End Thoughts (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 21:01:56 -0500
In other words Toby, what YOU would like to read on this reflector, is postings ONLY from hams who are willing to spend 3500 bucks and be happy with a product that does not work the way it's advertis
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00957.html (9,933 bytes)

210. [TenTec] My Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 18:04:38 -0500
Below is a copy of an email I recently posted to TTBUG (Ten Tec firmware group). The suggestion about the keying loops came from W9GE. "My Orion is 19 months old. Since owning it I have had continiou
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00993.html (8,613 bytes)

211. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec and Years End Thoughts (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 18:08:46 -0500
To keep the peace, I will ignore your references to me in this post. But FYI, your December 24, 2004 email to this reflector was just posted on this reflector yesterday. Tom - W4BQF After reading a r
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00994.html (8,801 bytes)

212. Re: [TenTec] My Orion - qsk (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 03:28:39 -0500
Hi Martin, Please keep in mind, this is just my opinion and only how I operate, and probably does not follow what one would consider 'classic QSK', if there is such a thing. So, how I precieve full Q
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg01008.html (12,362 bytes)

213. Re: [TenTec] Re:Re: [Ten-Tec Orion] QSK (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 17:37:50 -0500
Hi Jim... Well truthfully there is a lot of folks who agree with your statement about doing it manually. Especially the German hams that operate in the HSC. They totally scoff at the ham's in the sta
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg01030.html (10,583 bytes)

214. Re: Re: [TenTec] Re:Re: [Ten-Tec Orion] QSK (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 19:14:20 -0500
Really? In some 20 years of QRQ, I've never heard him on the air. Do you know if he is still active? Do you know if he is active and where he hangs out? When you say "current speed holder for CW copy
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg01079.html (9,032 bytes)

215. Re: [TenTec] CW copy speed record holder (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 21:37:45 -0500
No. It probably means he can copy normal conversational code faster than that!! RUFZ is extremely difficult to copy in that all that is sent is random international call signs. That is almost, but no
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg01082.html (8,909 bytes)

216. Re: [TenTec] Re:Re: [Ten-Tec Orion] QSK (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 22:37:56 -0500
Thanks Jim. That would be neat to get back into QRQ again at the higher speeds...IF I can still do it..hihi. Tom - W4BQF -- Original Message -- From: "Jim Lowman" <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net> To: <tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg01091.html (10,091 bytes)

217. [TenTec] Forward (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 18:23:38 -0500
Forwarded by: Tom - W4BQF I sent the following to "tentec@contesting.com): "I am in complete agreement with Tommy, W4BQF. Questioning TT is certainly not bashing it. I purchased the 12th Orion made a
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg01107.html (8,006 bytes)

218. Re: [TenTec] Forward (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 20:47:51 -0500
Hi John, Nope, I've never had any problem either. I think the problem with Ray's email was that it was on 'stationary'. When I first forwarded it, it also got rejected from here. But after removing t
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg01117.html (9,591 bytes)

219. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6 filter jumper (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 21:08:46 -0500
Ira, Looking from the front of the rig, High gain is to the left. Tom - W4BQF I have a new to me Omni 6 opt 1 but manual is for 6 plus. I am putting 500hz filter in narrow position but the gain jumpe
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg01178.html (8,028 bytes)

220. RE: [TenTec] Computer control (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy Alderman" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 22:39:53 -0500
Scott.... I agree with what you are saying about SO2R. I don't use the N4PY radio control software and don't know if it handles contesting or SO2R, but I sure agree that contesting software IS essent
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg01182.html (10,725 bytes)

Current List: 201 - 220
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu