Mail Archive Search: <+from:aldermant@alltel.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:aldermant@alltel.net: 641 ]

Total 641 documents matching your query.

201. Re: [TenTec] omni v short dits (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 22:16:15 -0400; Haw! Actually I don't think I would read it because I've about had enough! I have two external keyers, a PC that uses an open collector transistor for keying, and an old DGM keyboard that uses a reed; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00779.html (12,790 bytes)
202. Re: [TenTec] omni v short dits (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 07:04:00 -0400; Toby.... Interesting!! I've got two Orions here and they both do the same. Were you watching the RF output waveform with a scope? The sidetone sounds excellent at high speeds, it's just that on mine,; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00785.html (14,082 bytes)
203. [TenTec] Re: BTW what is the best QSK radio? (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 08:42:41 -0400; Hi Martin, First, thanks very much for keeping the country files updated for YPlog. I still use and love that program! I do a lot of high speed (mostly over 60 wpm) full QSK CW operations, so QSK is; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00786.html (10,022 bytes)
204. Re: [TenTec] omni v short dits (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 11:52:11 -0400; It must be Sunday because my brain cell just can not tell the difference between increasing the key-on time and decreasing the key-off time, and changing the weight ratio of a character. If you delay; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00789.html (20,604 bytes)
205. Re: [TenTec] omni v short dits (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 14:41:36 -0400; Well Jim, the reason for sending CW at speeds over 80 wpm is because there ARE hams who can copy it. And Jim, they do it by ear, simply because a code reader (or none that I know of) can copy that fa; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00800.html (29,926 bytes)
206. Re: [TenTec] omni v short dits (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 14:51:05 -0400; And which mode in ham radio is that operated under? Tom - W4BQF _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00801.html (10,734 bytes)
207. Re: [TenTec] Re: TenTec Digest, Vol 19, Issue 81 (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 21:23:57 -0400; Not a problem. I'll be glad to sell you a few more. And at a reasonable cost, of course. Tom _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.con; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00823.html (7,810 bytes)
208. Re: [TenTec] omni v short dits (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 21:30:08 -0400; Well thanks for your explanation Adam. For sure, if I had been living in a cave for the past sixty-five years, I would not have known about commercial applications of CW. I just didn't understand wha; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00824.html (10,043 bytes)
209. Re: [TenTec] omni v short dits (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 02:41:19 -0400; Hi Dave, This reflector is not the right forum to talk about copying code maybe, so I'll make a few comments and then drop the subject. However if you want to discuss it, I'm certainly open to doing; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00829.html (12,543 bytes)
210. Re: [TenTec] omni v short dits (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 09:34:18 -0400; Hi Mike..... Yep. By the way I understand what happens, I would say you nailed it!! Some of the things you read on this reflector, if you let it, certainly could drive one to drink. Tom - W4BQF to ke; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00837.html (26,630 bytes)
211. Re: [TenTec] CW (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:32:01 -0400; My 85 year old friend is Ted, K5LGJ, who lives in Shrevesport, La. and I have been talking with him probably 15 years. It seems like he probably picked up QRQ when he was in his sixties. We still chi; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00865.html (7,884 bytes)
212. Re: [TenTec] CW (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:54:35 -0400; Naw...you got that backwards...some years ago he severely burned both hands...the surgery is to remove some 'webs' between his fingers so he CAN type at 80 wpm again!!! Pretty gutsy for someone that; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00870.html (10,619 bytes)
213. Re: [TenTec] CW (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:58:41 -0400; Hay Richard, you meet all the requirements. My old friend, Ira/NU2C could make a keyboard sing at 120+ wpm. Ira is a classical concert pianoist! On the other hand, KB8XE is a welder...so go figure!!; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00872.html (12,685 bytes)
214. Re: [TenTec] CW (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 20:13:59 -0400; Well most of the new radios wont do it. Just today I talked to a guy on 20m who has both an Orion and a new IC-7800. I asked him to run it up to 70 wpm but it garbled the characters at that speed, mu; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00875.html (9,334 bytes)
215. Re: [TenTec] CW (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 22:54:01 -0400; Sorry Stuart, but your information is incorrect. I have a copy of the transmission, sent by a Wheatstone tape by the way, that Frank Borsody W2AYN and Harold Taylor checked for accuracy, that McElroy; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00881.html (9,252 bytes)
216. Re: [TenTec] CW (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 23:33:16 -0400; Your quite welcome John. BUT...I wish I could encourage you to take a stab at QRQ. It is such a blast to have QSO's at high speed's and once you do it, you really do get kinda hooked on it! my frust; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00882.html (10,441 bytes)
217. Re: [TenTec] CW (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 23:59:41 -0400; Sorry folks...got caught by the 'Reply' thing again. Even though I changed the send-to address, it still came to the reflector. I would like to end the thread on QRQ CW on the reflector, but would be; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00883.html (12,029 bytes)
218. Re: [TenTec] Orion loss of audio (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 19:16:55 -0400; If your running v1.371, then your seeing a 'normal' firmware problem that the guys at TT have been diligently working on. I'm sure they hope to have that fixed before the next firmware update. Unfort; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00928.html (10,233 bytes)
219. Re: [TenTec] No Orion Update (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 21:11:53 -0400; Nope. No update. But they do have several issues they are working on very hard, such as the audio, filter selections, and a few other issues. But they are continuing to work on the next release. At t; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00949.html (8,793 bytes)
220. Re: [TenTec] Basic question (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2004 15:36:28 -0400; Great advice! Tom - W4BQF PS...where do I buy one of them 'AVC' things? Does Radio Shack sell 'em? How much power duz they put out? Or will they work on SSB? compare well process working ____________; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00012.html (10,576 bytes)

Current List: 201 - 220
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]