Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:benk8dit@callatg.com: 62 ]

Total 62 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter Transceiver (score: 1)
Author: "Ben K8DIT" <benk8dit@callatg.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 19:47:21 -0800
Hey John, Im replying offline as my comments are personal. I have both the Omni VI/opt and the Jupiter. Both are very nice CW rigs. I have reviewed both at eham. net and you might take a minute to re
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00108.html (8,168 bytes)

22. Re: [TenTec] Inrad roofing filters for Omni VI, anyone using? (score: 1)
Author: "Ben K8DIT" <benk8dit@callatg.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 21:05:12 -0800
Because the 2.4khz roofing filter is 25% of the stock12khz roofing filter in bandwidth, one could surmise that there is an improvement of some significance on cw over the 12khz stock roofing filter,
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00218.html (7,892 bytes)

23. Re: [TenTec] Rig changes (score: 1)
Author: "Ben K8DIT" <benk8dit@callatg.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 16:57:34 -0800
You will be ecstatic with the additional performance and features available on the Jupiter. Your antenna farm will determine alot, hopefully they are optimized to your satisfaction. Check out all the
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00563.html (6,820 bytes)

24. Re: [TenTec] Rig changes (score: 1)
Author: "Ben K8DIT" <benk8dit@callatg.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 21:55:06 -0800
If once you have the Jupiter you are plagued with BCB front end overload, simply place a high pass filter ahead of the transciever. I use an ICE 402X, there are others, or, build one to suit if you a
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00576.html (8,102 bytes)

25. Re: [TenTec] Rig changes (score: 1)
Author: "Ben K8DIT" <benk8dit@callatg.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 19:52:30 -0800
It seems to me that your description of the reason you didnt like the transceiver weren't as you first reasoned. Its kinda quirky that detractors of the Jupiter don't like it for one special reason a
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00589.html (9,487 bytes)

26. Re: [TenTec] We need a ten-tec to compete with Icom 706 MKIIG (score: 1)
Author: "Ben K8DIT" <benk8dit@callatg.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 19:45:16 -0800
I like the premise W3KC has. Keep it simple. The Scout is a perfect platform to update whatever mobile Ten Tec might have in mind, though I think that 's already been done with the Argonaut V. If I w
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00713.html (8,283 bytes)

27. Re: [TenTec] LP feature (score: 1)
Author: "Ben K8DIT" <benk8dit@callatg.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 06:42:45 -0800
Here's the way I use it. After finding a signal Im interested in, usually in less than optimal condx., and have used all the other controls at hand to tune it in, I then hit the LP button. If I think
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00775.html (7,650 bytes)

28. Re: [TenTec] Inrush Current Protection? (score: 1)
Author: "Ben K8DIT" <benk8dit@callatg.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 11:32:03 -0800
No downside. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00006.html (7,366 bytes)

29. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI freq instability, 30m only (score: 1)
Author: "Ben K8DIT" <benk8dit@callatg.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 12:08:16 -0700
Could be your PLL is out of lock on 30M. If your ovenized xtal were faultly, all the bands would be acting up. Ben K8DIT _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@con
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00046.html (7,373 bytes)

30. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI freq instability, 30m only (score: 1)
Author: "Ben K8DIT" <benk8dit@callatg.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:39:14 -0700
The VI has a PLL that incorporates those single crystals/band in a synthesized scheme that mixes and feedsback, get divided, multiplied, phased and split, then poured into glasses and served with lem
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00068.html (8,406 bytes)

31. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6 (Option 1) Intermittent Audio (score: 1)
Author: "Ben K8DIT" <benk8dit@callatg.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 07:18:36 -0700
Chuck, Its time to jiggle and diddle. You may have a trace lifting. Once you trace to a board that acts up you might try using some component cooler to pinpoint the problem. If this technique is not
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00292.html (7,448 bytes)

32. [TenTec] Tryin' to Keep it Real, Compared to what... (score: 1)
Author: "Ben K8DIT" <benk8dit@callatg.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 07:38:12 -0700
Heard on the air over the weekend. That's the news from Lake Jobegon. The radio here is a Ten Tec, where all the rigs are strong and all the Amps are good lookin', and all the recievers are ABOVE ave
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00293.html (6,706 bytes)

33. Re: [TenTec] RFI question for Orion and other TT rigs (score: 1)
Author: "Ben K8DIT" <benk8dit@callatg.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 11:00:59 -0700
Hey Roy, Anticipating RFI, knowing what it is and understanding what to do about it is far different from what the folks who complain about it on the internet ham forums such as this. If you begin wi
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00681.html (7,779 bytes)

34. [TenTec] Digital Voice (score: 1)
Author: "Ben K8DIT" <benk8dit@callatg.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 18:32:15 -0700
Anyone doing digital voice over the hf bands? Id be interested in any reports of kits, gear, software that claims to do this. Im aware of AOR's voice modem, but their new AOR9000 is not on the shelve
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00699.html (6,493 bytes)

35. Re: [TenTec] Radios suitable for mobile operation (score: 1)
Author: "Ben K8DIT" <benk8dit@callatg.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 12:55:27 -0700
Pete, Of the many mobile hams I know something about, the Scout gets picked fewer times than not, but I don't understand why. Ive used the Scout mobile and the NB is a necessary accessory cutting the
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00259.html (9,815 bytes)

36. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1)
Author: "Ben K8DIT" <benk8dit@callatg.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 16:57:28 -0700
What's the drift of the conversation about version 2? Is it imminent? Anticipation is exciting, but if it's ready for prime time, Im looking forward to trying it out. Ben K8DIT ______________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-09/msg00465.html (7,890 bytes)

37. [TenTec] Orion anomoly report (score: 1)
Author: "Ben K8DIT" <benk8dit@callatg.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 09:04:28 -0700
I discovered that my main reciever will not hear anything past 3.960 on 75 meters. From there to the band edge at 4.000mhz there is silence on the main rcvr only. The entire band up to that point wor
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-10/msg00200.html (7,674 bytes)

38. [TenTec] Updated Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Ben K8DIT" <benk8dit@callatg.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 07:08:13 -0700
I have Orion serial # 10654 with a 10c prefix, which means a production date of Oct. '04. I bought it used and found a 40khz band segment missing on 75meters. I was told this was a synthesizer alignm
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-10/msg00395.html (7,430 bytes)

39. Re: [TenTec] Updated Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Ben K8DIT" <benk8dit@callatg.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 16:55:58 -0700
The Tx audio settings have been resolved. I misset the TX EQ. The repair/update is now whole and complete. The rig is good. Fabulous. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing li
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-10/msg00403.html (6,874 bytes)

40. Re: [TenTec] Station (score: 1)
Author: "Ben K8DIT" <benk8dit@callatg.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 06:55:39 -0800
Well, since you're not that old, just pick a rig that you know the technology factor, time frame and price level and go for it. Used gear is not hard to find since the advent of the internet which y
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00074.html (7,226 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]
This search system is powered by Namazu