Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:chacuff@cableone.net: 164 ]

Total 164 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TenTec] USER INTERFACE: Wish List for ORION-III (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 21:01:42 -0500
I guess I would have to see what possibilities it would offer. My limit of computer control has been through my logging program...DXLab. I'm not much on computer controlled radio. I'm a hands on op.
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00177.html (12,411 bytes)

42. Re: [TenTec] Wish List for ORION-III (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 08:00:48 -0500
Good info Paul.... Different perspective... Cecil K5DL Sent from my iPad
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00196.html (13,424 bytes)

43. Re: [TenTec] How much should an ORION-III cost? (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 14:10:08 -0500
Equipped how? Base.... Sent from my iPad
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00211.html (11,255 bytes)

44. Re: [TenTec] How much should an ORION-III cost? (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 15:38:31 -0500
An assembled base 100W K3 is $2350 and shipping. If that's a stretch for a customer then he should be buying an Eagle...not an OIII An Omni VII costs more than a base K3....and is way more capable. W
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00218.html (13,639 bytes)

45. [TenTec] FS Omni VI Opt 3 station. (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 18:34:55 -0500
I have a very nice Omni VI factory upgrade to Option 3. All filter slots full in both IF's, Inrad SSB Roofing filter mod. Recently serviced with connectors on every board pulled, treated with Deoxit
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00305.html (7,696 bytes)

46. Re: [TenTec] How much for an Orion III? (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 20:03:49 -0500
Yep....google the St. Julian's Creek massacre for pictures of piles of R-390 series receivers sitting out in the weather. Fortunately the destruction of those were stopped and all were sold surplus..
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00333.html (21,744 bytes)

47. Re: [TenTec] How much for an Orion III? (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 20:56:15 -0500
Nothing except they both are discussions about things we really can't do anything about....no harm either way. And I care about both....one is our history and the other our future...both important. T
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00336.html (24,098 bytes)

48. Re: [TenTec] RX-366? (score: 1)
Author: <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 04:28:01 +0000
Gosh I hope not...I was hoping to pick one up myself once I got the cash together... Cecil K5DL I can no longer find mention of it anywhere on their web site. I guess I have missed my chance as it mu
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00418.html (10,094 bytes)

49. Re: [TenTec] RX-366? (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 10:50:55 -0500
The market for the 366 was the installed base if existing transceivers. It was marketed as an upgrade..not just an option for new receivers. It put the Orion on a more even footing with the K3 in tha
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00438.html (13,856 bytes)

50. Re: [TenTec] RX-366? (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 13:21:34 -0500
I don't consider my OII to be any less worthy of the upgrade since it's been discontinued. I've not really seen a decrease in prices of used OIIs over the last few months...not any more so than any o
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00451.html (12,442 bytes)

51. Re: [TenTec] RX-366? (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 14:29:25 -0500
Hi John, Understood....but I didn't get from your response whether the RX-366 has been discontinued or not. Reading between the lines you seem to indicate that decision has not been made. Cecil K5DL
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00455.html (9,916 bytes)

52. Re: [TenTec] RX-366? (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 16:37:22 -0500
Yep...Thanks...that's great news. It had been reported that it was no longer listed on the web site. Thanks John... 73 Cecil K5DL Sent from my iPad
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00466.html (9,730 bytes)

53. Re: [TenTec] RX-366? (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 20:42:00 -0500
All depreciating assets....but loads of fun. Sent from my iPad
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00470.html (14,491 bytes)

54. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI mystery (score: 1)
Author: <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 17:35:02 +0000
If that just came back from the factory I would ship it back up to them...sounds like a simple alignment issue but it should have been caught in final checkout before being shipped. Without some test
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00587.html (10,491 bytes)

55. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+, 422 and 253? (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 18:46:52 -0500
Sorry sir but an Omni VI+ and an Omni VI Rev 3 are the same thing. I have one of each and there are no differences between them internally. Some of the later Omni VI+ had surface mount components as
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00121.html (10,489 bytes)

56. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+, 422 and 253? (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 09:07:33 -0500
Sent from my iPad Thanks you made my point... Don't care what the model number is, technically...electronically they are the same, and the discussion was centered around interfacing to the radio wher
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00132.html (9,805 bytes)

57. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+, 422 and 253? (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 09:42:51 -0500
The only part of that that makes any sense would be that it is easier to date a 564 and it being newer than any 563. I guess there is no way to really know except by a check of the serial number how
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00143.html (11,659 bytes)

58. Re: [TenTec] What's going to be next? (score: 1)
Author: <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 17:20:21 +0000
Dang John....a Motor Coach...I figured you as more of a Pop Up guy...I mean it does everything one would want of a camping device. Hey just a little humor... Cecil K5DL From: John King Sent: January
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-01/msg00187.html (17,288 bytes)

59. Re: [TenTec] What's going to be next? (score: 1)
Author: <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 17:47:47 +0000
Well I hope they stick with the dual VFO knobs. It may seem silly but that is one of the big reasons I went to an Orion II. I came from Yaesu FT-1000 series radios and two things I really enjoy havin
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-01/msg00188.html (13,052 bytes)

60. Re: [TenTec] What's going to be next? (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 13:55:56 -0600
Not so much. I like the black but would like the control markings to contrast the background....or better yet be backlit...LEDs are cheap. I dislike metallic plated plastics for something like a fron
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-01/msg00233.html (10,725 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu