I guess I would have to see what possibilities it would offer. My limit of
computer control has been through my logging program...DXLab. I'm not much on
computer controlled radio. I'm a hands on op.
Cecil
K5DL
Sent from my iPad
> On Apr 8, 2014, at 8:23 PM, K8JHR <jrichards@k8jhr.com> wrote:
>
> OK by me.
>
> But ... if it is connected to the computer, you could easily write software
> to allow you to interactively tune the rig with a mouse or keyboard action,
> and I suspect it would be more difficult to do that with a rig-monitor-only
> solution.
>
> I would kidnap N4PY and coerce him into writing a neato interactive control
> application for it. Like in his existing program. You click on a signal
> peak on the graphic screen, and, VOILA, the radio tunes to that frequency
> /signal... and,... optimally, tunes and makes the call using a bank of
> recorded contact voice keyer sound files, and then logs the contact in your
> favorite log book, and emits a sound cue indicating it is ready to make
> another contact. (OK... perhaps I have gone too far in my imagination...)
> ;-) ;-)
>
> So... would your solution be interactive... or do we not need that?
> Interesting stuff.
>
> ----------------- JHR -----------------
>
>> On 4/8/2014 7:48 PM, Cecil wrote:
>> ...would rather have a VGA port on the radio to connect
> a standard off the shelf computer monitor to...that
> way I could also determine the size of the display.
> __________________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|