Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:duffyb01@fuse.net: 114 ]

Total 114 documents matching your query.

21. [TenTec] 516 QRP Radio (score: 1)
Author: duffyb01@fuse.net (J. Duffy Beischel)
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 07:19:34 -0500
January 2002, no wait...Spring 2002....wait...June maybe....well, you might want to check with God...He may know. packing it up. ______________________________________________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00054.html (7,674 bytes)

22. [TenTec] Jupiter taking a beating? (score: 1)
Author: duffyb01@fuse.net (J. Duffy Beischel)
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 07:19:34 -0400
As one pro-Jupiter put it, it's Ten-Tec bashing. Especially when you see the same guy making numerous negative posts. Yes, people can be unhappy with the rig just like any other rig. Multiple negativ
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00693.html (10,371 bytes)

23. [TenTec] Jupiter taking a beating? (score: 1)
Author: duffyb01@fuse.net (duffyb01@fuse.net)
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 8:52:43 -0400
Jeff and others, My only disagreement with what you said is that I believe you get a lot more radio for what TenTec is charging for the Jupiter(TT - that comment is not a license to increase the pric
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00702.html (12,249 bytes)

24. [TenTec] Jupiter taking a beating? (score: 1)
Author: duffyb01@fuse.net (duffyb01@fuse.net)
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 10:52:48 -0400
Every happy Jupiter owner on this list should post a positive review to counter the slamming that is occuring. Keep it up, multiple times, until the childish bashers subside. JMHO Duffy To: <tentec@c
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00707.html (14,121 bytes)

25. [TenTec] Jupiter takes an UNFAIR Beating (score: 1)
Author: duffyb01@fuse.net (duffyb01@fuse.net)
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 14:46:35 -0400
Actually, he gave it a bad rating THREE times. His previous call is W0AKR. I did a little research. Of course I put in THREE 5 ratings to try and counteract this BS he's pulling. Duffy www.wb8nut.com
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00720.html (9,017 bytes)

26. [TenTec] Jupiter taking a beating? (score: 1)
Author: duffyb01@fuse.net (duffyb01@fuse.net)
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 14:48:55 -0400
I think Rob is right on with his analysis on this. To: <tentec@contesting.com>
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00722.html (11,976 bytes)

27. [TenTec] eHam reviews.... (score: 1)
Author: duffyb01@fuse.net (J. Duffy Beischel)
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 20:17:38 -0400
If I were Scott, I consider withdrawing all advertisements from eHam until they start acting responsibly. Second, if the guy has reservations about TT, TT probably does not want to advertise with the
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00743.html (10,699 bytes)

28. [TenTec] Orion at Charlotte (score: 1)
Author: duffyb01@fuse.net (duffyb01@fuse.net)
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 14:06:44 -0500
Scott, I know a number of hams are interested in the Orion. But how about giving everyone an update on the new QPR DSP radio. When are we going to see that little puppy? Duffy - WB8NUT To: <tentec@co
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00217.html (9,453 bytes)

29. [TenTec] Re: New TT QRP 516 Rig Pictures? (score: 1)
Author: duffyb01@fuse.net (J. Duffy Beischel)
Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2002 15:28:46 -0500
Too much talk about the Orion. Anyone get any pictures posted anywhere of the new DSP QRP rig? That's what I want and that's what I can afford! Thanks, Duffy _________________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00318.html (8,379 bytes)

30. [TenTec] Re: Ten Tec's Story on the 516 (score: 1)
Author: duffyb01@fuse.net (duffyb01@fuse.net)
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 11:04:28 -0500
Dear TenTec, I did not send a letter of support for you folks to build them and start selling them now, but here is my advanced order for a 516. E-Mail me as soon as they're ready to ship and I'll ca
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00445.html (10,157 bytes)

31. [TenTec] KB7OEX: TenTec Blinders (score: 1)
Author: duffyb01@fuse.net (duffyb01@fuse.net)
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 12:49:14 -0500
Well everyone's prespective is different. Yes, the TT equipment in the very early days looked kind of goofy from a cabinet standpoint. Yes, the Scout was weird with the plug in modules. I have owned
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00502.html (9,489 bytes)

32. [TenTec] Jupiter update (score: 1)
Author: duffyb01@fuse.net (duffyb01@fuse.net)
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 13:16:09 -0500
I have the problem also, but it is not something that I can reproduce on a consistant basis. It's not RF. Are you saying we are going to get a firmware update to fix it? Duffy - WB8NUT To: <tentec@co
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00778.html (8,182 bytes)

33. [TenTec] Jupiter update (score: 1)
Author: duffyb01@fuse.net (duffyb01@fuse.net)
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 13:21:07 -0500
Whoops, nevermind, I read my e-mails backwards. I see we have a fix..Cool! To: <tentec@contesting.com>
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00779.html (8,023 bytes)

34. [TenTec] Jupiter update (score: 1)
Author: duffyb01@fuse.net (duffyb01@fuse.net)
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 17:05:09 -0500
Hey, the greatest thing about the TT Jupiter is that if and when I problem exist, they can correct it with a firmware update. Isn't but one rice box I know that can do that, and I don't think the Jap
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00782.html (11,318 bytes)

35. [TenTec] Jupiter update (score: 1)
Author: duffyb01@fuse.net (J. Duffy Beischel)
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 07:26:16 -0500
Firmware is a general term referring to embedded code in a chip. Whether you "program" the chip, or you have to buy a preprogrammed chip and install it, both are usually referred to as firmware. With
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00788.html (8,081 bytes)

36. [TenTec] Jupiter & PSK31 (score: 1)
Author: duffyb01@fuse.net (J. Duffy Beischel)
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 23:27:18 -0500
I found that you need an interface at least for isolation. Get something real inexpensive. You don't need an overpriced rigblaster. I don't have the time to build so I got an interface from Donner Di
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00844.html (8,582 bytes)

37. [TenTec] ** Jupiter firmware revision 1.14 ** (score: 1)
Author: duffyb01@fuse.net (nospam) (J. Duffy Beischel)
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 18:04:03 -0500
I also have the LDG external tuner and would love it if the new version reduces the power with the external tuner. Maybe all you have to do is tell the Jupiter that you have an external tuner and it
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-02/msg00154.html (10,038 bytes)

38. [TenTec] Jupiter 1.14 Firmware Problem(s) (score: 1)
Author: duffyb01@fuse.net (nospam) (J. Duffy Beischel)
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2002 22:04:10 -0500
I just did the 1.14 update and it works fine. A big thank you to Ten Tec on this one. The reduced power function on tune is what I have been asking for. It works fine. I went from SSB (full power) to
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-02/msg00179.html (8,622 bytes)

39. [TenTec] Jupiter 1.14 Update?? (score: 1)
Author: duffyb01@fuse.net (nospam) (J. Duffy Beischel)
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 07:23:17 -0500
They did leave it out of the Jupiter update. Dowload the update for the RX-350. The 1.14 firmware update for the Jupiter can be found in that download. That is what I did to load 1.14 to my Jupiter.
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-02/msg00182.html (8,373 bytes)

40. [TenTec] Jupiter 1.14 Update?? (score: 1)
Author: duffyb01@fuse.net (duffyb01@fuse.net)
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 13:16:25 -0500
Well apparently the way TT released the firmware is that all the versions for their various products seem to be in the same download. There were 4 different .ruf files with the RX350 download. The Ju
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-02/msg00185.html (10,861 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu