Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jim.allen@longhornband.net: 223 ]

Total 223 documents matching your query.

101. [TenTec] RMAs (score: 1)
Author: Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 16:26:18 -0500
One change since the "merger" is in sending stuff in for repair. When I sent my VI in the last two times, I called, they said send it in, etc. Now, I see the website has the requirement to call or e-
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-09/msg00016.html (7,734 bytes)

102. Re: [TenTec] RMAs (score: 1)
Author: Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 17:21:07 -0500
I did receive it this morning, thanks. The box went to UPS this afternoon and it should be there by Monday, RMA and callsign on the outside, letter on the inside. So far, so good. 73 de W6OGC Jim All
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-09/msg00031.html (8,754 bytes)

103. Re: [TenTec] Tentec Hamfest REMINDER (score: 1)
Author: Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 17:24:27 -0500
Good grief! I hope they have time to fix my radio before chaos takes hold. I feel like I'm getting to teh bar just as the fight breaks out or something. 73 de W6OGC Jim Allen
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-09/msg00032.html (9,587 bytes)

104. Re: [TenTec] Tentec Hamfest REMINDER (score: 1)
Author: Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 05:47:48 -0500
I hope so. Having moved a well organized operation a couple of times, and knowing what a distraction that can be, I am nervous. 73 de W6OGC Jim Allen
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-09/msg00041.html (8,740 bytes)

105. Re: [TenTec] OT Crap (score: 1)
Author: Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 10:51:21 -0500
I used to wake up grouchy sometimes, then I figured, shoot, just let her sleep! 73 de W6OGC Jim Allen
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-09/msg00071.html (9,699 bytes)

106. Re: [TenTec] Eagle Tuner (score: 1)
Author: Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 15:46:59 -0500
What makes a 130' center fed dipole a Zepp? 73 de W6OGC Jim Allen
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-09/msg00099.html (13,062 bytes)

107. Re: [TenTec] Zepp? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 09:52:16 -0500
That's what I have now, except instead of a balun, I match with an AH-4 remote autotuner which handles it with ease, as long as you don't want to run more than ~120 watts, which I don't. It works fai
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-09/msg00117.html (12,088 bytes)

108. Re: [TenTec] SWR is a DUMB Indicator of Antenna Performance (score: 1)
Author: Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 10:40:06 -0500
*It seems that here we fall largely to the victim of verbal semantics.* I thought you were going to rant about the marketing of antennas in advertising. I have long considered the ads and accompanyin
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-09/msg00198.html (20,114 bytes)

109. Re: [TenTec] din connector, news from Hall Mountain KY (score: 1)
Author: Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 11:30:18 -0500
What was the cause of death? 73 de W6OGC/AE Jim Allen
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-09/msg00274.html (8,238 bytes)

110. Re: [TenTec] Oooo-PS (score: 1)
Author: Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 12:19:33 -0500
I've sent my Omni VI and VI+ back and forth to Sevierville on UPS and nary a problem. The VI+ is due to be delivered here on Monday. Tentec uses a new box with new packing every time, won't reuse the
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-09/msg00276.html (10,278 bytes)

111. Re: [TenTec] Shipping methods (score: 1)
Author: Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 21:32:18 -0500
I have never had a problem with UPS, or Fedex for that matter. We used Fedex a great deal in our business in California. Today my Omni VI+ arrived from a factory repair, replacing all the relays on t
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-09/msg00344.html (11,692 bytes)

112. Re: [TenTec] din connector, etc. (score: 1)
Author: Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 17:42:55 -0500
I have appreciated your help Bob. Frankly, I don't read the manual the same way you do, and can't. These radios are sufficiently complicated that that is not really a practical alternative for many o
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-09/msg00389.html (24,974 bytes)

113. Re: [TenTec] Why is Eagle #2 on order? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 08:11:43 -0500
Chances are substantial, although far from certain, that UPS driver put it on the wrong door. If it happened to be the door of an honest person, that person will be getting in touch with the recipien
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-08/msg00004.html (13,058 bytes)

114. Re: [TenTec] [TenTec_Eagle] Re: Why is Eagle #2 on order? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2014 18:26:43 -0500
If that sort of conduct catches on, some of us will have to go to barber college. The younger ones anyway! Glad it was straightened out. 73 de W6OGC Jim Allen
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-08/msg00086.html (11,927 bytes)

115. [TenTec] 160 Meter Problem (score: 1)
Author: Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 09:11:30 -0500
I was sitting in the shack minding my own business last night when I noticed on the DX cluster that W1AW/5 was on 1821.5 in Oklahoma. I have not tried 160M here, but do have a 130' dipole and an AH-4
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-08/msg00261.html (8,987 bytes)

116. Re: [TenTec] 160 Meter Problem (score: 1)
Author: Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 09:31:57 -0500
The AH-4 actually matches just about anything as long as it is longer than 7M, the longer the better, but not an even 1/4 wl. There is a spreadsheet of "forbidden lengths" available in the Yahoo Grou
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-08/msg00263.html (11,696 bytes)

117. Re: [TenTec] 160 Meter Problem (score: 1)
Author: Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 10:20:41 -0500
I'm out here in the shack now with the radio to a dummy load. To answer Carl's question, no, there was no noticeable change in current going from receive to tune. I tune at very low power, just enoug
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-08/msg00265.html (15,284 bytes)

118. Re: [TenTec] 160 Meter Problem (score: 1)
Author: Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 10:43:08 -0500
OK, Omni VI+ on Dummy Load, Omni VI on dipole. With no antenna on VI, I can barely hear the VI+. With the dipole I hear it loud and clear. Thanks! 73 de W6OGC Jim Allen
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-08/msg00270.html (19,402 bytes)

119. Re: [TenTec] 160 Meter Problem (score: 1)
Author: Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 11:01:55 -0500
Is that something the factory should do, or is it so easy even a lawyer can do it? ;>) 73 de W6OGC Jim Allen
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-08/msg00271.html (11,336 bytes)

120. Re: [TenTec] 160 Meter Problem (score: 1)
Author: Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 11:13:26 -0500
"As I advance the PWR control, and get on the other side of halfway, there are occasional spikes on the meter, very short. As the PWR is advanced, the Ic suddenly jumps from zero to about 10, then in
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-08/msg00274.html (22,625 bytes)

Current List: 101 - 120
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12]
This search system is powered by Namazu