Mail Archive Search: <+from:jimr.reid@verizon.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:jimr.reid@verizon.net: 541 ]

Total 541 documents matching your query.

161. [TenTec] Re: ARRL Rcvr 3rd and 2nd IPs Test Methods (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Wed Mar 5 19:10:24 2003; Ok, folks, here is a proper format, I hope, with easily read font....and spell checked! My continuing note exchange with Ed Hare, ARRL Lab Supervisor. HI again Ed, And thanks for your note, in which; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00199.html (19,614 bytes)
162. [TenTec] Ed Hare's First Response to my 2nd and 3rds post of 3/4 (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Wed Mar 5 19:20:14 2003; I rcvd and email from Ed. He has not yet been "accepted" by the list moderator to join the TT reflector. He has asked me to post his first reply to my comments about the ARRL Lab test procedures/meth; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00200.html (29,154 bytes)
163. [TenTec] Re: ARRL Rcvr 3rd and 2nd IPs Test Methods (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Wed Mar 5 19:24:27 2003; And, Ed also asked that his second reply to me be posted to the reflector. That is the post to which I most recently responded which contains much of his remarks, but with a lot of my stuff tossed in; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00201.html (14,889 bytes)
164. [TenTec] Re: ARRL Rcvr 3rd and 2nd IPs Test Methods (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Wed Mar 5 20:10:23 2003; Now here again, Ed has responded to my last post. He has also requested that I repost to the reflector, so here goes (this one came here about only 10 minutes ago): " Actually, by "Collins" standard,; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00206.html (20,955 bytes)
165. [TenTec] More IP3 Stuff (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Fri Mar 7 16:08:29 2003; Hi again, Am still thinking about the deltas between the ARRL IP numbers as they report about the Argo V and the Ten Tec claimed typical specs. Not concerned, however, as TT reports pleasure with the; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00299.html (11,507 bytes)
166. [TenTec] More IP3 Stuff (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Fri Mar 7 16:52:03 2003; Oops! Thanks, Ed. 73, Jim PS: I have looked, but can't find that I logged down my QSO with Dean on the TT 2, oh well.; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00304.html (8,425 bytes)
167. [TenTec] More IP3 Stuff (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Fri Mar 7 18:32:34 2003; see Well, that is interesting. The International Broadcast bands are full of powerful stations, each separated by only 5 kHz from the next. The 340 seems to have no trouble dealing with those, even; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00309.html (8,390 bytes)
168. [TenTec] RX-340 vs. Orion, Dynamic Range (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Fri Mar 7 20:56:49 2003; Hi, Last October, before I placed an Orion on order, I had asked Doug Smith about trading in my RX-340. I have always been very interested in "clean" signal performance of rcvr's, thus my interest an; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00322.html (8,722 bytes)
169. [TenTec] RX-340 vs. Orion, Dynamic Range (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Sat Mar 8 00:40:01 2003; Another "oops"; and I apologize to Paul Christensen as it was he who referenced and then quoted from Carl's work. 73, Jim KH7M; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00328.html (6,678 bytes)
170. [TenTec] Any info on Orion at Charlotte? (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Sat Mar 8 20:59:05 2003; Was the spectrum sweep display "operating"? Seems the front panel software has been THE problem for months, or am I wrong? 73, Jim KH7M; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00339.html (7,240 bytes)
171. [TenTec] More IP3 Stuff (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Sat Mar 8 21:21:33 2003; Ed, W1RFI, reported on Friday results from the ARRL Lab screen room: Oh my, now some added lights have been turned "on"! I now have a whole bunch of questions/thoughts, hi. First off: an epiphany! I; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00340.html (15,057 bytes)
172. [TenTec] More IP3 Stuff (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Sat Mar 8 23:26:01 2003; A very clear display of what AGC gain reduction, or switched in attenuation via such device on a radio will do, just scroll on down to the IP table which Ten Tec displays on the RX-340 specification; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00345.html (9,535 bytes)
173. [TenTec] More on IP3 (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Sun Mar 9 19:27:40 2003; Ed, W1RFI, wrote, in part: [I have numbered Ed's steps for future reference] "on channel" = the frequency to which the rcvr is tuned, as an illustrative example, lets choose 14195 kHz as the test fre; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00373.html (9,369 bytes)
174. [TenTec] Misc. Orion comments (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Mon Mar 10 19:06:08 2003; Manufactured cost = prime product assembly labor and materials, only. For a Growing company, x 6 those two factors alone will pay all other costs, marketing, equipment, G&A, rent, etc., etc. and als; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00440.html (8,685 bytes)
175. [TenTec] More IP3 Stuff (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Mon Mar 10 21:55:12 2003; Don't know; I can't find a thing about it anywhere at the TT web site. Where do you find this gadget? If it is the combiner U. Rohde makes reference to, as designed by Doug Smith, I am sure it is ju; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00459.html (8,537 bytes)
176. [TenTec] Misc. Orion comments (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Tue Mar 11 20:38:26 2003; Greg, AB7R, wrote, in part: and materials, only. My x 6 factor came from my experience years ago in the microwave component industry. We mfg. both silicon transistors and various components using sil; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00492.html (9,335 bytes)
177. [TenTec] Orion +25 dBm IP3 Tests (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Fri Mar 14 15:47:28 2003; Hi again, Still mulling on this IP3 topic and our ham band radios, and the possible differences between the manufacturer's claims and the ARRL labs reported test data results. Ten Tec has had publish; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00554.html (8,543 bytes)
178. [TenTec] Needed IMD Info, Low level IP3 test (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Fri Mar 14 18:28:06 2003; Hi again, Thanks to Ed, W1RFI, for his comments about the coming Orion IP3 tests by the ARRL Lab. My REAL interest in all of this is to know: how good is the rig in a tough DX pile up, or during a me; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00567.html (10,715 bytes)
179. [TenTec] Equinox Day (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Sat Mar 15 14:04:27 2003; Hi, Yes, today is equinox day here on the Island of Kauai. Sunrise this morning here was at 6:47 AM, HST; sunset this evening will occur at 6:47 PM, HST. Thus, 12 hours of daylight and 12 hours of ti; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00599.html (7,834 bytes)
180. [TenTec] Equinox Day (score: 1): Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid); Date: Sat Mar 15 14:58:51 2003; Do programs, such as my GeoClock, account for that refraction, or do they just calculate based upon the geo center of the Sun's actual disk, or the "apparent" disk as caused by this refraction? I rec; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00605.html (9,095 bytes)

Current List: 161 - 180
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]