Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jruing@ameritech.net: 1145 ]

Total 1145 documents matching your query.

281. Re: [TenTec] RFI Issues and other station high voltage precautions (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 20:27:15 -0400
That is CORRECT ! Although... HE DOES NOW !! His story came up during a similar conversation on a short wave radio discussion group, and similar to the original inquiry on this thread, his listening
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00233.html (11,191 bytes)

282. Re: [TenTec] Radial Research (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 14:05:34 -0400
Most studies concur that "buried radials" should not be deep but preferably at the surface. Hear, Hear !!! Surely the goal is the grab the RF before it can be absorbed by the lossy earth. My wife is
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00244.html (12,441 bytes)

283. Re: [TenTec] RFI Issues and other station high voltage precautions (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 14:54:36 -0400
All my ground loop problems went away after Bob, K4TAX, and Jim Brown, K9yc, talked about this same thing on another reflector a couple of years ago. It now seems so blamed obvious... like smacking y
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00246.html (11,321 bytes)

284. Re: [TenTec] Radial Research (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 15:37:09 -0400
Oh... Kriss... I implore you to AT LEAST double the number of radials ! 25 would be a really good number. You can roll out 45 feet of wire, and crimp on a lug, and lay it in the yard with some wire l
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00250.html (9,350 bytes)

285. Re: [TenTec] Radial Research (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 16:48:30 -0400
_______________________________________________ On 5/19/2012 7:35 AM, Billy Cox wrote: However, to make postings claiming 12-18 db GAIN or that elevated radials are "best" is a distortion of technica
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00253.html (15,885 bytes)

286. Re: [TenTec] RFI Issues (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 17:04:45 -0400
My friend is a home builder ... and he advised against drilling holes in the basement floor. Water entering the basement is just one of the reasons he advanced against. Just MY take... -- K8JHR -- __
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00254.html (9,592 bytes)

287. Re: [TenTec] Radial Research (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 03:07:43 -0400
Cool. Just think what he could do with a REAL antenna !! ;-) But seriously, folks: You advance an odd sort of argument. Apparently, you consider it more admirable to enter a contest and fight tooth a
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00265.html (13,331 bytes)

288. Re: [TenTec] RFI Issues (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 15:55:41 -0400
On 5/21/2012 3:21 PM, Jim Brown wrote: On 5/17/2012 1:13 PM, Stuart Rohre wrote: Jim I respectfully disagree, as I have seen examples of radiating "ground" wires causing RFI. Since you didn't quote a
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00276.html (12,329 bytes)

289. Re: [TenTec] gas on the fire (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 17:00:48 -0400
First, I think that if you modeled a ground mounted vertical and the same vertical at 330 feet above ground, you might find the radiation pattern (take off angle) would not be the same for the two i
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00279.html (9,341 bytes)

290. Re: [TenTec] RFI Issues (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 17:28:02 -0400
That depends on how the end fed half-wave dipole is fed. See my Coax Chokes Power Point for one form of end fed half wave dipole that does NOT use the coax as a counterpoise, but DOES use the coax s
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00280.html (11,897 bytes)

291. Re: [TenTec] Radial Research (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 17:50:00 -0400
If your local soil varies so much that your radial currents are not balanced, the effect will likewise alter your pattern, but that does not prevent the vertical from working as expected, it just ma
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00282.html (12,307 bytes)

292. Re: [TenTec] Radial Research (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 18:36:05 -0400
I am a late bloomer in ham radio. I was not an engineer in a former life, and am still grappling with basics. I still find matters of IMPEDANCE ...SWR... reactance... radiation resistance, etc., a pu
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00284.html (10,595 bytes)

293. Re: [TenTec] Radial Research (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 21:51:25 -0400
Thanks, Stuart. I will look for the treatises you mention, and add them to the several books I have now. I have a pile of ARRL books, a few by a guy named Orr, and one by Joe Carr on receiving antenn
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00286.html (9,962 bytes)

294. Re: [TenTec] This Old Rig Tonights Project: Replacing the Corsair II PTO with a DDS VFO (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 22:16:48 -0400
Boy... what a lovely statement of what the hobby can mean to us. The love of a rig, home brewing repairs and modifications, freely sharing detailed technical information across oceans, making plans f
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00328.html (10,041 bytes)

295. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter with ALS 600 (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 03:04:49 -0400
I will let the more qualified guys answer the question better, but: 1) Congratulations - nice birthday present. 2) Check the Jupiter manual. Typically, it only needs an key line to key the amp. 3) Ch
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00349.html (10,442 bytes)

296. Re: [TenTec] OT Use of external keyer with Omni (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 16:21:08 -0400
. I have decided to build the K1EL WKUSB keyer; > it was a tough decision over the Idiom Press K-5 and the Begali CW Machine. Could you please send me an off list message on why you chose the K1EL ov
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00364.html (9,507 bytes)

297. Re: [TenTec] OT Use of external keyer with Omni (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 16:48:05 -0400
Sounds fantastic... can it read code for me ? ;-) (OK... not a serious question, but if you remember learning the code, you will appreciate my angst and desire here...) ____________________ K8JHR ___
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00365.html (9,277 bytes)

298. Re: [TenTec] OT Use of external keyer with an Omni and hex beams (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 22:36:33 -0400
looking for an antenna that I could mount on an aluminum pole (probably a Penninger radio mast) at about 35 feet or so. -- I use galvanized steel masts at 35-45 feet, which I believe are stronger tha
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00368.html (8,476 bytes)

299. Re: [TenTec] CW Filters ??? FOLLOW UP (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 18:23:17 -0400
I THANK ALL OF THE MEMBERS WHO REPLIED TO MY INQUIRY ABOUT NARROW FILTERS FOR MY OMNI VII. After considering all the comments and recommendations for a week or so, I have decided to spring for both f
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00372.html (9,139 bytes)

300. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VII AF/RF Encoder problem (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 21:14:39 -0400
Gee, no. That would really suck. Have you tried re-installing the firmware, from a fresh copy, and then do a master re-set ? Maybe even loading up a previous firmware version... Nope, this is not log
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00013.html (8,037 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu