Mail Archive Search: <+from:jsb@digistar.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:jsb@digistar.com: 153 ]

Total 153 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [TenTec] Yet another basic question (score: 1): Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>; Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 12:19:11 -0400; So, asking about your experiences with the Orion audio and types of headphones which seem to work the best. AKG K 240 DF are quite nice, light also. You could wear these for days. I use mine all the; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00622.html (9,231 bytes)
62. [TenTec] The QSK of QSK (score: 1): Author: jsb@digistar.com; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 09:49:47 -0400 (EDT); It's probably safe to say that the majority of CW ops using radios with good filtering systems to reduce background noise and proper sidetone adjustment prefer QSK - running QSK without getting the s; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00689.html (9,898 bytes)
63. [TenTec] QSK on Lake Shoshobocomo (score: 1): Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 22:19:47 -0400; Finally, may I simply state that in listening to CW QSOs on the bands, I almost *never* hear true QSK operation, where the operators are breaking in on each other. I'd say maybe 1% of the QSOs I hea; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00738.html (9,381 bytes)
64. Re: [TenTec] re Ten Tec amps and ALC (score: 1): Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 20:31:07 -0400; If everyone could just back off on the PA collector current to prevent overdrive I guess there would be no need for external ALC control but then I don't think I'd see rear panel ALC jacks on new rig; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00841.html (9,016 bytes)
65. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ firmware rev. (score: 1): Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>; Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 23:24:50 -0400; This is getting interesting. He checked and his 6+ has rev 1.02. Again, mine is 1.03. Then I found this in the archives: http://lists.contesting.com/archives/html/TenTec/2001-09/msg00106.html So it; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00928.html (10,397 bytes)
66. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ firmware rev. (score: 1): Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>; Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 18:21:55 -0400; Note: All the above is with firmware ver. 1.03. I have no idea what 1.02 does but apparently it does key faster. QSK with V1.02 is pretty damn fast as long as plug 52 is removed on the IF/AF circuit; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00954.html (9,813 bytes)
67. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ firmware rev. (score: 1): Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>; Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 20:40:44 -0400; What's plug #52? The mod consists of unplugging connector 52 on the I.F./A.F. Board. = Wow - this is quite nice. Disconnecting that plug makes sidetone work as I prefer, and better yet, the AGC acti; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00959.html (9,364 bytes)
68. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ firmware rev. (score: 1): Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>; Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 08:30:17 -0400; The plug 52 problem arose because a segment of established Omni users expressed a strong preference for sidetone volume to be independent of RX AF gain setting. Ten Tec responded to user pressure by; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00967.html (14,369 bytes)
69. [TenTec] grounding dipoles (score: 1): Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>; Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 15:51:19 -0400; I have 3 dipoles on a single push-up pole about 4 or 5 feet apart on the pole - I use a 4-way antenna switch to switch from one antenna to the other. I'm curious if I should disconnect the dipoles i'; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00973.html (8,545 bytes)
70. Re: [TenTec] grounding dipoles (score: 1): Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 06:43:35 -0400; Assuming that the dipoles are each for separate bands, I'd suggest just tying the coax together. RF will always flow down the path of least resistance (or reactance) so only the antenna that is cut; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00989.html (8,946 bytes)
71. [TenTec] WTB instant trip breaker (score: 1): Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 17:58:42 -0400; Anyone know where I can buy the T11-0-18.0A-21121-1 Airpax breaker (or identical equivalent)? I tried pocosales but they did not have this particular unit, only 20A fast trip (not instant trip). 73 J; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg01000.html (7,034 bytes)
72. [TenTec] old Orion firmware (score: 1): Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 21:25:02 -0400; I have a chance to play with an Orion for a few days (if I drive to go get it) - was there ever a version of the Orion firmware which had "real" QSK at 70+ wpm? Would be neat to play with the older f; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg01057.html (7,546 bytes)
73. Re: [TenTec] Studio One Mic (score: 1): Author: jsb@digistar.com; Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 17:47:39 -0400 (EDT); The TX audio offset (near the very bottom of the MNU list) should be set at around 400 or 500Hz with the Studio One on a Jupiter. Experimentation is required for the best audio to match your particul; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg01077.html (7,591 bytes)
74. Re: [TenTec] Studio One Mic (score: 1): Author: jsb@digistar.com; Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:19:44 -0400 (EDT); Something I forgot to mention... As you increase the TX offset you also increase the top end limit in frequency response being transmitted. So in the above example of raising the TX audio offset to 5; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg01091.html (8,337 bytes)
75. Re: [TenTec] WTB Studio One Mic (score: 1): Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>; Date: Sun, 09 May 2004 12:26:51 -0400; Anyone out there in TT land wishing to sell his/her Studio One? Please raise your hand and be counted. Cheers Bill_Harris_w7kxb _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list Te; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00223.html (8,006 bytes)
76. Re: [TenTec] 450 ohm Feed Line - N5BEA (score: 1): Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>; Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 18:55:07 -0400; Make sure your feed line is cut for 1/4 wave at your lowest band/frequency of operation. I'm getting the ladder line bug and am wondering how to feed it - the shack is between the outside wall of the; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00171.html (9,427 bytes)
77. Re: [TenTec] 450 ohm Feed Line - N5BEA (score: 1): Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>; Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 21:06:20 -0400; I am thinking about getting one of these gizmos to make life simple: http://radio-ware.com/llock.htm But regardless of what I use to tie the antenna wire to the ladder line, am I going to get myself; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00174.html (9,795 bytes)
78. Re: [RE: [TenTec] RFI and Orion ] (score: 1): Author: jsb@digistar.com; Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 10:37:22 -0400 (EDT); i've thought about that but worried about lightning taking that path and boring a large hole in the house. Do you have some kind of quick disconnect?; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00408.html (7,827 bytes)
79. [TenTec] power to the shack - drop? (score: 1): Author: jsb@digistar.com; Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 10:41:51 -0400 (EDT); 450Ohm ladder line? Do you have much drop when running full bore? I have a 10 gauge run for amps and 12 gauge for the radios about 50 feet. Drop is low on them but I could use the space in my breaker; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00411.html (10,513 bytes)
80. [TenTec] cheap packet tnc for use on the road (score: 1): Author: jsb@digistar.com; Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 14:35:09 -0500 (EST); Does anyone have any recommendations for a 300bps TNC for use with the Jupiter? I want to run HF packet while travelling with my Jupiter - just wondering what everyone is using and recommends... and; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00092.html (7,072 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]