Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jsb@digistar.com: 153 ]

Total 153 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [TenTec] Re: [WCARC] BPL Rollout A PLAN of ACTION (score: 1)
Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 07:34:13 -0500
Absolutely NOT! I only advocated a legal scientific operations test, which is what The BPL companies have failed to DO! ARRL has asked for hams to collect information on RFI they suffer/ create in n
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00113.html (9,600 bytes)

82. [TenTec] tighter filter for Jupiter (score: 1)
Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 17:34:00 -0500
Does anyone know if there is a way to get a tighter filter for the Jupiter? I find myself trying to squeeze the bandwidth filter tighter than 300Hz. There are times I wish I had 100Hz! :-) 73 Jason N
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00242.html (8,132 bytes)

83. Re: [TenTec] tighter filter for Jupiter (score: 1)
Author: jsb@digistar.com
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 09:04:43 -0500 (EST)
Thanks to all who replied. I would ultimately prefer to see the firmware modified slightly to further narrow the bandwidth instead of a post-AF stage filter. It seems, using MixW to analyze the outpu
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00260.html (8,881 bytes)

84. Re: [TenTec] Recommended Desk Mics for Jupiter (score: 1)
Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 07:36:08 -0500
Is the TenTec Model 706 important for the Jupiter to shine or would most any mic sound OK? The 706 is perfect match - crisp and clean audio. 73 Jason N1SU
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00289.html (7,715 bytes)

85. Re: [TenTec] Recommended Desk Mics for Jupiter (score: 1)
Author: jsb@digistar.com
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 15:54:33 -0500 (EST)
The fan would be useful if you plan to operate at 20W continuous. I found that the heat sinks get warm when I get very long winded on PSK or MFSK. I don't have the model 310 fan (I wish I did though)
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00325.html (8,579 bytes)

86. RE: [TenTec] eHam charging for Subscription (score: 1)
Author: jsb@digistar.com
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 16:30:16 -0500 (EST)
Subscription-based access to internet websites is always a failure unless you have cornered the market on a very specific offering. I work for a company that wrestles with this subject, with great pa
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00328.html (8,878 bytes)

87. Re: [TenTec] eHam (score: 1)
Author: jsb@digistar.com
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 16:36:32 -0500 (EST)
That wouldn't be too hard. I built something kinda like that on a lark in a couple days. http://dining.digistar.com/ I don't feel too comfortable trying to replicate eham's reviews site because they
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00329.html (7,423 bytes)

88. [TenTec] AM operation (score: 1)
Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 21:16:48 -0500
Has anyone out there any experience running AM on the Jupiter? I pressed the TUNE button while in AM mode but didn't see anything change as I expected - AM drive, mic gain, etc all stay the same valu
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00452.html (7,587 bytes)

89. Re: [TenTec] AM operation (Jupiter 538) (score: 1)
Author: jsb@digistar.com
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 08:02:50 -0500 (EST)
I've seen these before - to me it looks like I have to change AM-DRIVE to 25 watts or less and adjust the mic gain so that the ALC light only comes on during voice peaks. But what I do not understand
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00463.html (11,645 bytes)

90. Re: [TenTec] QST April Article (score: 1)
Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 21:04:55 -0500
Doesn't look like it. It does have a slot for a compact flash card, but this is for transferring settings I think. I have not seen anything about updates that way. Given that this radio is very likel
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00502.html (9,337 bytes)

91. Re: [TenTec] K3BU terminates "Review Business" (score: 1)
Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 21:07:51 -0500
Anyone out there wishing to join the "Dream Radio" design team, please let me know. Don't forget the CW PTT line.
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00503.html (7,413 bytes)

92. [TenTec] Something to be said for the Jupiter's internal speaker... (score: 1)
Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 12:26:06 -0500
Well, I thought I was doing myself a favor using a studio-grade speaker on my Jupiter but i'm finding I like the internal speaker a lot better, at least for CW work. For phone operation i'm undecided
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00551.html (7,217 bytes)

93. Re: [TenTec] Capture area (was 80 meter loops) (score: 1)
Author: jsb@digistar.com
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 15:00:24 -0500 (EST)
Hmmm... So is a halfwavelength dipole a preferable antenna than a endfed halfwave for a given band? How does an endfed fullwave or 3/2 wave antenna compare to 1/2 wave endfed vs dipole? 73 Jason N1SU
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00610.html (10,618 bytes)

94. Re: [TenTec] ditsnbits auto-responder (score: 1)
Author: jsb@digistar.com
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 16:46:32 -0500 (EST)
My experiences with picking up the phone and calling Ten-Tec has been as good as it gets. Email is fine but it's as weak as the excuse "the dog ate my homework" - if you've got something to say, use
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00615.html (8,909 bytes)

95. Re: [TenTec] Capture area (was 80 meter loops) (score: 1)
Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 21:59:51 -0500
On the other had a 3/2 wave END fed monopole has the same drawback as a 1/2 or 2/2 wave end fed monopole. The feedpoint impedance is outta sight! Thanks Pete and Sinisa... I was just trying to get an
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00619.html (10,031 bytes)

96. Re: [TenTec] Capture area (was 80 meter loops) (score: 1)
Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 13:35:32 -0500
I definitely agree with Sinisa. I have tried direct feeding an antenna, starting with the antenna terminial on an ARC5 around 1948 or '49, and never had much luck with it. Except at picking up a rema
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00637.html (10,583 bytes)

97. Re: Fw: [TenTec] Capture area (was 80 meter loops) (score: 1)
Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 20:23:29 -0500
Excellent. Would that same .28 wavelength value carry for all bands or specific to a single band? Yes, the same 0.28 wavelength value carries over for all bands. That's a number that I "eye-balled"
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00648.html (10,131 bytes)

98. Re: [TenTec] New Jupiter having trouble?? (score: 1)
Author: jsb@digistar.com
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 15:49:08 -0500 (EST)
Auto Sweep is on - hit MNU and scroll to find AUTO SWEEP and turn it off. I have mine set for 120 wide so I can turn a fair bit but it's all preference. 73 Jason N1SU
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00125.html (8,253 bytes)

99. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter ALC mod (score: 1)
Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 18:33:36 -0500
The N9VV website ( www.N9VV.com ) mentions a mod to the Jupiter ALC circuit that is apparently approved by the factory. It involves replacing the 4.7 mF C107 with 2.2 mF. The website says that witho
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00375.html (7,969 bytes)

100. Re: [TenTec] Re: TenTec Digest, Vol 14, Issue 68 - Sensitivity Issues (score: 1)
Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 21:35:28 -0500
Sayonara! Hooray!
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00795.html (8,746 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu