- 1. Re: [TenTec] need 252 mo schematic (score: 1)
- Author: "Dave Heller" <k3tx@fast.net>
- Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 11:32:45 -0400
- I should have the 252 info if you still need - is your QRZ qth correct? Dave K3TX-- Original Message -- From: <awyatt2@bellsouth.net> To: <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 1:43
- /archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00373.html (7,538 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TenTec] roller inducter help (score: 1)
- Author: "k3tx" <k3tx@fast.net>
- Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 13:30:55 -0500
- Would it be difficult to make a new bushing to replace the worn one? Sounds like a simple lathe job. Is it brass/bronze or plastic (teflon)? -- Original Message -- From: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <gera
- /archives//html/TenTec/2006-10/msg00618.html (8,715 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TenTec] Triton IV stuff... (score: 1)
- Author: "k3tx" <k3tx@fast.net>
- Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 13:31:02 -0500
- Congratulations on having your Triton. On the negatitive side, it's hardly nearly as imposing looking as many other rigs, and is certainly quite short on the bells-and-whistles. On the other hand, th
- /archives//html/TenTec/2006-10/msg00619.html (9,839 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TenTec] Want: Ten-Tec Omni D 546, Series B manual (score: 1)
- Author: "k3tx" <k3tx@fast.net>
- Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 00:19:20 -0400
- I have the full book for Omni A & D - is that what you'd like, or just portions? Could Xerox what's needed. Dave, K3TX (note, my e-mail system is very sporadic; if an answer to me doesn't get timely
- /archives//html/TenTec/2006-10/msg00636.html (8,211 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TenTec] was - "Radiates like Crazy"???? No (score: 1)
- Author: "DaveHeller" <k3tx@fast.net>
- Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 18:46:30 -0400
- That 73 article says nothing more than when a band's open any sort of antenna will work something. Absolutely no mention of az or el radiation patterns. Or the all-important field comparison with a h
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00276.html (11,502 bytes)
- 6. Re: [TenTec] Vertical Dipole "Fringe Benefits" (score: 1)
- Author: "DaveHeller" <k3tx@fast.net>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 18:48:57 -0400
- Where did that 3.05 ft per meter come from? Looks more like 3.28+ ft/meter. Just remember two ratios: 2.54 cm/in and 39.37 in/meter. And in finer measurements, l mm = about 0.040 inch. Your system of
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00406.html (15,268 bytes)
- 7. Re: [TenTec] FCC says CW dead (score: 1)
- Author: "DaveHeller" <k3tx@fast.net>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 17:11:48 -0400
- Agree. Gosh, any moron can pick up a mike. Now sending and receiving cw at 30 wpm is an art. CW is ham radio. jim, K4CFA _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@con
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00709.html (8,479 bytes)
- 8. Re: [TenTec] FCC says CW dead (score: 1)
- Author: "DaveHeller" <k3tx@fast.net>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 17:11:47 -0400
- Agree. Gosh, any moron can pick up a mike. Now sending and receiving cw at 30 wpm is an art. CW is ham radio. jim, K4CFA _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@con
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00710.html (8,612 bytes)
- 9. Re: [TenTec] Old Omni/30 mtrs (score: 1)
- Author: "DaveHeller" <k3tx@fast.net>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 23:26:06 -0400
- $50 for a WORKING Omni D? That's not a bargain. It's grand larceny. Invest another couple $ in a manual from T=T - I think they're in stock and if not I'll make a photo of mine. It's short on bells a
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00735.html (9,453 bytes)
- 10. Re: [TenTec] More than Orion (was: ORION, THE TERRIBLE 12) (score: 1)
- Author: "DaveHeller" <k3tx@fast.net>
- Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 00:05:41 -0400
- I echo Catilyn. I tried the JA big 3, every time the top of the lines; someone loaned me a 544 Triton and I found the difference amazing. The only real on-line comparison was with a friend about 30 m
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00097.html (10,126 bytes)
- 11. Re: [TenTec] should I buy a FT-1000D (score: 1)
- Author: "DaveHeller" <k3tx@fast.net>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 23:24:45 -0400
- I can't help you much. I had one experience owning Yaesu - and there'll never be a second. Anyone with a bitch about TT operation - service - support - etc should give Yaesu a try. A sure cure. And y
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00642.html (13,571 bytes)
- 12. Re: [TenTec] Omni D External VFO Schematic (score: 1)
- Author: "DaveHeller" <k3tx@fast.net>
- Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 16:58:02 -0400
- Do you mean the mod. 243 external VFO? If so I have the manual - only 12 pages; a photocopy would be no problem. K3TX If anyone has handy the External VFO schematic for the Omni A-C series in digital
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-05/msg00093.html (7,946 bytes)
- 13. Re: [TenTec] Omni D External VFO Schematic (score: 1)
- Author: "DaveHeller" <k3tx@fast.net>
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 19:04:19 -0400
- I have the 243 VFO manual - would you like a copy? K3TX If anyone has handy the External VFO schematic for the Omni A-C series in digital format I sure could use one. My external system needs a bit o
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-05/msg00297.html (7,863 bytes)
- 14. Re: [TenTec] Omni D Schematic/Manual (score: 1)
- Author: "DaveHeller" <k3tx@fast.net>
- Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 11:55:12 -0400
- I have the Omni D book and can photocopy if needed. K3TX Turn the ALC control completely clockwise and leave it there always. Does that help? Don, W4DON Acquired a Omni D that has a low power output
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-05/msg00314.html (8,449 bytes)
- 15. Re: [TenTec] real CW ops (score: 1)
- Author: "DaveHeller" <k3tx@fast.net>
- Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 22:36:26 -0400
- My own opinion, for what it's worth, as a near 100% CW op: The computer sending, though theoretically technically perfect, sounds so artificial that I find it not the best to copy. The keyer with iam
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00180.html (11,425 bytes)
- 16. Re: [TenTec] real CW ops (score: 1)
- Author: "DaveHeller" <k3tx@fast.net>
- Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 11:45:36 -0400
- 100% agree. The keyboard-sending is bad enough. Dave, K3TX **On an entirely different topic I'd like input on a current project here. Our local township, Falls, in Bucks Co, PA (across the Delaware f
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00191.html (14,691 bytes)
- 17. Re: [TenTec] real CW ops (score: 1)
- Author: "DaveHeller" <k3tx@fast.net>
- Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 12:05:01 -0400
- I like that definition. K3TX That's the difference between a "typist" and a "real CW opr." :-) (I know a few keyboard users that AVOID the punctuation and full spelling of every word, and just type t
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00192.html (9,677 bytes)
- 18. Re: [TenTec] 'Real CW?' (score: 1)
- Author: "DaveHeller" <k3tx@fast.net>
- Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 13:30:56 -0400
- I have to agree with both of you. Of course the microphone is (at first) so much easier to use. Most everyone can talk. CW can be easy for some and very rough for others. Regardless, it's really up t
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00245.html (10,776 bytes)
- 19. Re: [TenTec] YACWD and real CW ops (FCC) (score: 1)
- Author: "DaveHeller" <k3tx@fast.net>
- Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 12:41:16 -0400
- The last of the full-time FCC examiners was Joe Welsh at the Philadelphia office. SK for many years now, but Joe was as nice and friendly a guy as you'd care to meet. He was an active ham - I forget
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00297.html (11,337 bytes)
- 20. Re: [TenTec] 'Real CW?' (score: 1)
- Author: "DaveHeller" <k3tx@fast.net>
- Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 00:22:01 -0400
- I'd imagine your experience and mine apply to most everyone, though most seem to learn the code a bit faster. As for T-T CW superiority, I'd tried various rice boxes - Yaseu = pure garbage; Kenwood =
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00314.html (9,905 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu