Mail Archive Search: <+from:k5uj@hotmail.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:k5uj@hotmail.com: 481 ]

Total 481 documents matching your query.

121. [TenTec] orion 2 shipping (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 14:41:43 +0000; I see that the ten tec website has yet to be graced with a photo of the entire orion 2. At this point, if you want to see what the thing looks like, you have to buy one or drive to Ten Tec. I must ad; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00375.html (8,447 bytes)
122. Re: [TenTec] THIS is why ten tec is Great (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 16:15:09 +0000; Thanks for the pix; much appreciated. How about the Omni VI as a classic? <<<TenTec monitors the list and responds to comments! Gee, I don't get that kind of treatment by Honda, VW. I doubt I'd get t; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00423.html (7,553 bytes)
123. Re: [TenTec] Centurion on AM or other carrier modes (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 02:42:41 +0000; Bob, I thank you for your correction and i think you have now set the record straight. All the best, Rob / k5uj Rob: First I have no problem in making my comments open to the reflector and I am doing; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00551.html (15,554 bytes)
124. [TenTec] QRP (warning TROLL post) (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 20:39:16 +0000; I run anywhere from 100w. to as much as my amp can put out, which seems to be around 1.1 kw. I have never had anyone say i'm too strong, please turn it down. but i have had people say I'm too weak; p; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00493.html (9,270 bytes)
125. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2005 12:36:41 +0000; Went to the ten tec website to see if there was anything new there, thinking since they are showing the new rig at the hamfest, they may have coordinated a simultaneous unveiling on the web site. whe; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-10/msg00012.html (13,076 bytes)
126. Re: [TenTec] Window line (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2005 13:29:54 +0000; that's real interesting data on window line. I never fooled around with it because i had heard of the problems, like wind resistance, one or both sides snapping due to metal fatique, and the Z changi; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-10/msg00013.html (9,779 bytes)
127. [TenTec] Transmission line loss due to SWR (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 14:47:19 +0000; One of the reasons why I chose to use open wire feedline for one of my antennas, was that I could not get it big enough to use on the lowest frequency I wanted to operate on with it, and I read in th; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-10/msg00140.html (7,704 bytes)
128. [TenTec] re Window line (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 10:53:04 +0000; hi Dean, good to hear from you. that ~250 w. loss sounds right. i went back and looked at what i wrote. i think i was wrong about the power into the line--i wrote 1 kw, but now that i think about it,; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-10/msg00165.html (7,329 bytes)
129. [TenTec] FW: [Fwd: Feedline loss calculator] (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 21:18:19 +0000; this was posted to tower talk reflector--it is a pretty cool calculator that lets you compare losses of different feedlines keeping other conditions constant. compare for example the loss of 600 ohm; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-10/msg00167.html (7,965 bytes)
130. Re: [TenTec] Centurion 40 m. oscillation (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 14:32:33 +0000; Sounds like the Orion may be sensitive to common mode RF and/or ten tec's fixed tuned input circuits in the centurion. If an 8' jumper is needed you would think they'd say that in the manual. The rea; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-10/msg00220.html (14,508 bytes)
131. Re: [TenTec] Centurion 40 m. oscillation (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 21:47:57 +0000; <<<Hi Rob - Agree with most all your comments - As I dig into the Centurion deeper , there are a lot of corners cut that I would have done differently. My biggest dissatisfaction is with the power su; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-10/msg00228.html (13,873 bytes)
132. Re: [TenTec] Centurion 40 m. oscillation (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 22:05:16 +0000; <<<There is much anecdotal evidence that the type oscillation reported can be due to loose coax fittings -- fittings on jumpers that are not sufficiently on only one band? I doubt it. rob/k5uj ______; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-10/msg00229.html (9,109 bytes)
133. Re: [TenTec] Centurion 40 m. oscillation (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 23:38:21 +0000; <<<There is much anecdotal evidence that the type oscillation reported can be due to loose coax fittings -- fittings on jumpers that are not sufficiently tightened. Replacing the coax with one of a d; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-10/msg00232.html (9,662 bytes)
134. Re: [TenTec] Centurion 40 m. oscillation (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 21:30:36 +0000; <<<No, I do not believe that the problem's occuring on only one band rules out loose cable fittings.>>> Hi Mike, Please explain how this can be--I'm not getting it. It seems to me that a loose feed c; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-10/msg00243.html (9,390 bytes)
135. Re: [TenTec] Centurion 40 m. oscillation (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 21:35:49 +0000; Hi Jim, <<<Rob, Excellent RF theory lesson on Amplifier design considerations.>>> ur welcome--glad to forward that along. <<<It looks like proper tuned input sections on each band can really make a d; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-10/msg00244.html (9,063 bytes)
136. Re: [TenTec] Centurion 40 m. oscillation (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 18:00:33 +0000; Hi Mike, My feeling is that this was a different type of problem. I guess we'll never know for sure. The kind of symptom you describe (RF feedback) is something i have experienced, but I have never s; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-10/msg00264.html (10,093 bytes)
137. [TenTec] omni 6 fan (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 13:03:31 +0000; I have found that if anything needs a fan, it's the matching ten tec linear supply heat sink. but for either one, what works for me is a small cheap plastic 3" diameter 115 v. fan on a little table s; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-10/msg00317.html (7,565 bytes)
138. [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 13:42:32 +0000; It is more than strange, it's bizarre. Am i to understand there is a display ad in QST that either doesn't show the rig, or shows the Orion 1? These guys have to get their act together when it comes; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-09/msg00213.html (8,999 bytes)
139. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2 (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 15:07:12 +0000; Ron, Ron, relax--it's a frigging radio company. let's look at this thing apart from emotions. Firstly, QST does not close months ahead of publication. For the October issue, the deadline for space re; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-09/msg00234.html (9,255 bytes)
140. [TenTec] Omni VI with option 3 info needed (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 16:26:59 +0000; I read in one of the posts on this topic something about sticking a Plus label on the front panel of an Omni VI option 3. People are free to stick anything they want on their equipment. However, if a; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-09/msg00261.html (8,370 bytes)

Current List: 121 - 140
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]