Mail Archive Search: <+from:k5uj@hotmail.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:k5uj@hotmail.com: 481 ]

Total 481 documents matching your query.

141. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec analyzer (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 14:30:50 +0000; I excitedly went to the ten tec website to look at the new analyzer which they want $655 for, and immediately read: USE YOUR PC AS LOW-COST RF VECTOR NETWORK ANALYZER stopped reading and moved on. I; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-09/msg00442.html (8,087 bytes)
142. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec analyzer (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 17:41:46 +0000; Duane, you are probably right about the connectors. Of course with a PC you get the capability of a pretty nice big color display and all the file management ability for the data so you can put a plo; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-09/msg00450.html (7,775 bytes)
143. [TenTec] good surge suppressor (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 13:58:40 +0000; The best surge protectors are not going to be found at some place like Best Buy. I recommend the following: Brickwall by Price Wheeler and the Industrial Communications Engineers protectors. The ICE; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00420.html (8,380 bytes)
144. [TenTec] FN Ham Radio (F'fen) report (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2005 16:49:14 +0000; <<<One of the biggest advantages of FN over Dayton is the size of the [new] facility. All of the ham fest events, like lectures or meetings (i.e., the contest forum) took place on-site in modern, air; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00100.html (8,594 bytes)
145. [TenTec] ladder line (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 01:10:55 +0000; I am a ladder line convert. I use 600 ohm open wire feed, not really ladder line technically, but the same scheme. I was a coax only ham until about 2 years ago. Parallel wire feed to me was too weir; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00299.html (10,235 bytes)
146. [TenTec] ladder line (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 20:01:00 +0000; <<<The 10dB between the zepp with ladder line and the Titan most likely had almost everything to do with how poor the Titan is on 75 and almost nothing to do with ladder line. A GAP Challenger also c; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00314.html (10,193 bytes)
147. [TenTec] ladder line (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 22:49:00 +0000; I have thought about rigid vertical dipoles before but didn't do anything because i was afraid ground effect would unbalance them (I didn't want to deal with insulating the bottom of the bottom half; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00324.html (8,949 bytes)
148. [TenTec] vertical dipoles (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 23:41:44 +0000; Anyone interested in more information about vertical dipoles should take a look at what Cebik has to say. As always, he has excellent information that is accurate and to the point: http://www.cebik.c; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00343.html (7,907 bytes)
149. [TenTec] vertical dipole (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 10:51:30 +0000; Thanks Rick, I wondered what the best length would be as I noticed that on 10 m. in RNL's article there is a high angle lobe that is pronounced. 73 rob/k5uj __________________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00360.html (7,268 bytes)
150. [TenTec] vertical dipoles (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 15:51:40 +0000; my hunch is that ground proximety on one side of a vert. dipole may do some unbalancing but it probably isn't significant unless the pipe making the bottom half is sticking down in salt water : ) oka; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00387.html (11,805 bytes)
151. [TenTec] MFJ dipole (was vertical dipole) (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 13:25:00 +0000; No offense Doug, but I have a feeling your beach location in connecticut has more to do with your performance into Europe than anything else. I have a hunch that if you took the MFJ antenna 1000 mile; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00456.html (7,305 bytes)
152. [TenTec] Ten Tec Net (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 22:35:43 +0000; I'll notify Riley. the net can expect to rx ur ONVs in the mail shortly. rob/k5uj ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Mike, We just had the TT net on 14.329 Kh. Starts at 4:30 PM Eas; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00468.html (8,260 bytes)
153. [TenTec] Tuner for Centurion to balanced antenna (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 16:06:35 +0000; First, forget about setting up something for your centurion. You want a system that can handle any amp up to at least 1.5 kw but preferably around 2 kw just for some margin for error, heating etc. If; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00508.html (12,526 bytes)
154. [TenTec] Tuner for Centurion balanced antenna (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 18:52:28 +0000; Rick is right in that there are a number of matching networks out that the manufacturers call balanced transmatches. i won't get into an engineering argument over the definition of a balanced transma; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00512.html (8,533 bytes)
155. [TenTec] Centurion Balananced tuner, matchboxes, etc. (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 11:49:04 +0000; One thing i forgot to mention is that a year or two ago QST had a review of new product balanced matching networks and they included a johnson matchbox for comparison. in the review you can see the m; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00526.html (8,024 bytes)
156. [TenTec] Orion debacle (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 11:56:29 +0000; Okay, I'll weigh in on this one time: Interesting how quickly the Ten Tec apologists can mobilize. A year or two ago, it was, "Never need to buy a new rig; the firmware updates will keep the Orion cu; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00651.html (13,010 bytes)
157. [TenTec] FCC says cw Dead? (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 11:23:40 +0000; Let's turn the burner down on this one: A. This is a rule proposal, not a report and order (actual rule change decision). B. It was a response to a bunch of petitions to get rid of cw testing among o; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00772.html (8,545 bytes)
158. [TenTec] cw testing / return policy (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 02:01:46 +0000; <<<It will make a difference for those who do operate CW, because there are no CW exclusive sub-bands. >>> Unless I missed something there are vast expanses of non-phone freqencies for hams on HF. bu; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00899.html (14,063 bytes)
159. [TenTec] cw testing / return policy correction (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 02:41:43 +0000; I'd like to correct the record; K7VO mistakenly wrote this: there are no CW exclusive sub-bands. 50.0-50.1 and 144.0-144.1 are, in fact, CW exclusive. No digital modes allowed. 73, Caity K7VO/8 Unles; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00975.html (8,136 bytes)
160. [TenTec] Terminology: Orion or Orion I (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 14:38:16 +0000; <<<I tend to agree that the release of the Orion II should produce some "spin off" advantages for the Orion. (Let me make my point clear, there is no such thing as the Orion I. There is the Orion and; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg01078.html (9,152 bytes)

Current List: 141 - 160
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]