Mail Archive Search: <+from:kd2e@comcast.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:kd2e@comcast.net: 377 ]

Total 377 documents matching your query.

301. Re: [TenTec] The QSK of SSB (score: 1): Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 09:05:56 -0400; Wrong. I suspect the hams that are in to contesting, and mark the contests off on the calendar use VOX, but the majority of hams do not use VOX. I've been on Field day every year since the SB102 days; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00684.html (13,027 bytes)
302. Re: [TenTec] The QSK of SSB (score: 1): Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 09:38:42 -0400; So you've established that you prefer QSK. So do I! The original post said "the majority of cw ops prefer QSK" Which I still hold is far from correct. There is life outside TenTec, and the average Ya; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00687.html (10,730 bytes)
303. Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK (score: 1): Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 10:24:34 -0400; Jim... You're biased!! Look at your rig list... Two Ten Tec amps, Two Ten Tec rigs..and a K2 QSK Heaven!! I just picked up an FT897D rig last week at HRO. I gave it a try in QSK mode... Ain't gonna h; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00694.html (10,835 bytes)
304. Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK (score: 1): Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 12:33:09 -0400; But someone is a 'LID' if they are dxing without QSK?? were those the radio fail)? a much noise FT100D full aren't; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00705.html (12,040 bytes)
305. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ picture (rear) wanted (score: 1): Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 15:30:25 -0400; Mine came with a line drawing of the back panel so you could find connectors while standing over it. I'll look around and see if I can find it. ....Dave -- Original Message -- From: <Able2fly@aol.com; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00878.html (7,658 bytes)
306. Re: [TenTec] Re: TT current production QSK rigs? (score: 1): Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 08:45:06 -0400; If the price is right, you will be happy with the Omni VI+ The Orion may be an outstanding rig, but I weigh the amount of questions about its characteristics I've heard vs. the price and went with an; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00968.html (8,819 bytes)
307. Re: [TenTec] MFJ - 974 (score: 1): Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 18:07:26 -0400; Its MFJ....'nuff said ...Dave -- Original Message -- From: <Able2fly@aol.com> To: <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 5:48 PM Subject: [TenTec] MFJ - 974 MFJ?; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg01079.html (7,345 bytes)
308. [TenTec] plug 52 tried (score: 1): Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 22:22:08 -0400; Well, I had some time this evening so I popped the cover off the Omni VI+ and pulled that plug 52. With and without headphones I sent a few 'test de KD2E V V V" At about 22 to 25 wpm, I could not det; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg01199.html (6,760 bytes)
309. Re: [TenTec] OT: Go Lance Go (score: 1): Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 17:59:56 -0400; I think his shack would be full of Icoms! Why is this here anyway??; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00523.html (7,756 bytes)
310. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ destined as a classic? (score: 1): Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 10:10:18 -0400; Well, years ago, I was shopping to replace my lowly FT757GX. I wanted to check out the OMNI V, but couldn't. (mail guarantee thing that I did not want to bother with). So, I picked up a Kenwood 850S.; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00580.html (9,883 bytes)
311. Re: Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ destined as a classic? (score: 1): Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 11:05:14 -0400; I have since sold it..and the 440sat I had at the same time. But, it was a very solid, reliable rig. I never had to refer to the manual when operating. On SSB receive...it sounded beautiful...closest; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00584.html (13,705 bytes)
312. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ destined as a classic? (score: 1): Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 15:20:23 -0400; Some people may not mind a big honking external contact Potter & Brumfield smacking away while they are sending. To me...any sound of a relay equates to non QSK. The Omni VI+ relay (not the external; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00596.html (11,101 bytes)
313. Re: [TenTec] Inquiry: Street Value for Omni IV+ ...? (score: 1): Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 13:31:48 -0400; You mean VI+?? ...Dave -- Original Message -- From: <murphman@erols.com> To: <TenTec@contesting.com> Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 11:21 AM Subject: [TenTec] Inquiry: Street Value for Omni IV+ ...? D; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00924.html (7,988 bytes)
314. Re: [TenTec] re: Let's Talk Furniture (score: 1): Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 06:54:23 -0400; Both links pulled up a "page cannot be displayed" error. (at least on my 'puter) ...Dave -- Original Message -- From: "Eric Rosenberg" <wd3q@starpower.net> To: "Jeff Kelly" <jkelly@bellatlantic.net>; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00040.html (9,254 bytes)
315. Re: [TenTec] Tranceiving accurately (score: 1): Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2004 10:21:57 -0400; Just listen to yourself (with headphones) on another receiver. Both should hear each other on the same tuning knob setting. ....Dave -- Original Message -- From: "Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX" <RMcGra; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00057.html (8,639 bytes)
316. Re: [TenTec] vertical radials (score: 1): Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2004 12:36:32 -0400; Feed them directly, and hang 'em up in the trees as a dipole. Just before they became MFJ, I was speaking with a tech rep from HyGain. There was an option for the tower...I think it was a coil and so; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00061.html (9,984 bytes)
317. Re: [TenTec] Re: Contesting (score: 1): Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 08:02:06 -0400; Uh...no, Actually, not a thing has changed. The Orion is still out of reach for many, and the Icom and Yaesu prices are just comical! ...Dave -- Original Message -- From: <al_lorona@agilent.com> To:; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00269.html (9,935 bytes)
318. Re: [TenTec] Re: Contesting (score: 1): Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 08:14:24 -0400; Well, you could mount the circuit boards on two strips of 1 X 3, and wrap some friction tape around the knob shafts instead of those expensive knobs. Same performance. The amount of 'pretty stuff' re; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00270.html (14,673 bytes)
319. Re: [TenTec] It just depends... (score: 1): Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 12:27:25 -0400; I am still in the process of deciding! I am fascinated by smooth, seemless QSK. I have not had smooth, seemless QSK since the Old Swan twins (600's). You could switch the antenna with a Johnson TR sw; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00336.html (11,198 bytes)
320. [TenTec] Anyone live in SD ?? (score: 1): Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 07:46:46 -0400; Any hams on the list from South Dakota? If so, could you contact me off the list? I had a few questions about SD Thanks.....Dave; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00695.html (6,763 bytes)

Current List: 301 - 320
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19]