- 241. Re: [TenTec] Re: Omni VI Roofing Filters (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 11:03:46 -1000
- Hi Tommy and group, Inrad roofing filter for the Plus is going to be selectable, using the N1 and/or the N2 button on the front panel. The filter is housed in the Inrad standard filter enclosure, and
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00958.html (8,500 bytes)
- 242. Re: [TenTec] Re: Omni VI Roofing Filters (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 11:14:35 -1000
- Since I have an Omni V there's only on NAR filter so only one choice. As with my Omni VI not + or option 3.
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00959.html (7,318 bytes)
- 243. Re: [TenTec] IMD Measurements - Yaesu/Inrad vs Orion (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 11:22:51 -1000
- I can hear no clicks at all into my sidetone when using my G4ZPY straight key ! Listen on another RX, not sidetone. Yes. In many (perhaps most) rigs the side tone has very little relation to the actu
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00960.html (9,842 bytes)
- 244. Re: [TenTec] IMD Measurements - Yaesu/Inrad vs Orion (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 12:55:58 -1000
- I tried this with a friend of mine this morning, he didn't notice anything strange in the CW enveloppe. Now, he was listening to me with an SGC 2020 with ADSP2 and a Yaesu FT-7B ! :-) Of course these
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00968.html (10,070 bytes)
- 245. Re: [TenTec] Decision Made (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2004 09:18:42 -1000
- Why work so hard when you can just hit the PTT button and say what you mean. There are a lot of reasons (wrong reflector for that discussion though), and when you understand them your enjoyment of am
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00992.html (9,426 bytes)
- 246. Re: [TenTec] Centaur (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2004 16:43:40 -1000
- don't use the Centaur much due to the fan noise. What mod. (size) Papst 57 CFM do you use? Would like to use the Centaur on ssb too. Taylor 572B's from RF Parts and replaced the original 100 CFM fan
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg01011.html (8,530 bytes)
- 247. Re: [TenTec] TXCO unit (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 12:34:22 -1000
- Also I wonder if the band oscillators are going to vary that much anyway...negating any better stability from the TCXO. The BFO oscillators are fairly stable. I have them adjusted to within a couple
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00323.html (8,734 bytes)
- 248. Re: [TenTec] QSK (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 21:15:24 -1000
- Phil, I think that is a great idea. When building any transceiver (or tx/rx pair) I would think that there would be an order of priorities for acheiving various operating capabilities. My preference
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00401.html (9,183 bytes)
- 249. Re: [TenTec] OT: On weasels (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 18:32:35 -1000
- Since it has been established that "weasel" refers to removing optional filters before selling a rig, I think it is important that some other terminology be established. Here are some suggestions for
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00544.html (9,130 bytes)
- 250. Re: [TenTec] Tentec Orion & Oscilloscope question (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 18:11:33 -1000
- I'd like to know the better way to take the "modulated signal" to inject it into an oscilloscope ? Someone already suggested a 30 dB 100 watt (or greater) rated attenuator. This is probably the best
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00554.html (10,643 bytes)
- 251. Re: [TenTec] Tentec Orion & Oscilloscope question (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 10:42:48 -1000
- 2. If I can't find this RF bird sampler (the best solution IMO)... then I'll go for the "T" shaped M/F/F plug on the ANT 1 output... Someone says that the radio will not see the small impedance bump
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00626.html (10,053 bytes)
- 252. Re: [TenTec] Tentec Orion & Oscilloscope question (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 11:49:28 -1000
- I agree with you. But I have found another cheep and dirty way to do the same thing. I have had good luck with it. Just cut off the center conductor of the PL-259 used on the coax. You will have a l
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00628.html (8,874 bytes)
- 253. Re: [TenTec] Noise canceling headphones (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 15:17:39 -1000
- hought about noise canceling headphones like the Heil Quiet Phone. Does anyone have experience with these or others on fan noise when working CW? There are only a few reviews on eHam. I am using Koss
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00665.html (10,024 bytes)
- 254. Re: [TenTec] Noise canceling headphones (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 17:02:40 -1000
- The Koss QZ Pro model *is* noise cancelling. Works pretty well. About $60. That is less than Heil's list price for active noise cancelling phones (without mic) and about the same price as the non noi
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00669.html (9,089 bytes)
- 255. Re: [TenTec] Noise canceling headphones (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 10:52:29 -1000
- $60.00 sounds good to me. R these just head phones... I am looking for a good headset... And where could I get more info on the Koss QZ phones? www.koss.com The Koss QZ/99 that I have are NOT active
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00683.html (10,079 bytes)
- 256. [TenTec] Omni VI no TX (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 18:25:04 -1000
- I experienced a problem with my Omni VI today. After having it turned off for a few hours (which is rare in my shack) with the antenna feedline disconnected at both ends, I turned it back on and proc
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00725.html (7,438 bytes)
- 257. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI v. Orion (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 19:49:31 -1000
- You might think this is a joke, but it would be interesting to have the DX spot reports show up on your rig's screen. Isn't that a feature the Kenwood TS-2000 was supposed to have, without using an e
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00003.html (7,429 bytes)
- 258. Re: [TenTec] Re: [Ten-Tec] Alas, not for me (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 07:22:19 -1000
- E. Alternatively, it's possible to modify a TS-870S by shoe-horning INRAD filters in place of the stock 2d and 3d IF filters, and this produces a radio with pretty good dynamic range. Excuse me John
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00025.html (9,381 bytes)
- 259. Re: [TenTec] Re: [Ten-Tec] Alas, not for me - more (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 18:55:27 -1000
- On the other hand Ken you are right. Introducing filters ahead of the A to D convertor will not improve A-D convertor dynamic range. The dynamic range of the A to D convertor will stay exactly as it
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00040.html (11,247 bytes)
- 260. [TenTec] Resonant antennas (score: 1)
- Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
- Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 12:01:52 -1000
- This is not a Ten-Tec specific topic, however..... And, of course, he/she needs to know how to change bands and load the antennas (which ought to be resonant). While there may be some reasons that it
- /archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00092.html (9,601 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu