Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ken.d.brown@verizon.net: 532 ]

Total 532 documents matching your query.

241. Re: [TenTec] Difference Between Omni VI+ and Paragon II (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 18:11:07 -1000
n4lq wrote: No keyer (Omni's keyer NG anyway) I thought so too, until I got it into the mode I am accustomed to. Mode 'B' I think, and now it is fine with me. No memories or other features, still a b
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00512.html (8,766 bytes)

242. Re: [TenTec] DSP in CW transmit? (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 10:28:03 -1000
Tom, I agree with you on a lot of the points you have made. I am sure you will get a lot of responses from people calling you "backward" or saying that if we all had your attitude we would be still b
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00582.html (11,359 bytes)

243. Re: [TenTec] cw cd (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 21:48:17 -1000
It's not about Ten-Tec, and I am not a fan of many of MFJ's products, however...The MFJ Morse Tutor is a great product. It is about the size of an old style pager, runs on a 9V battery and can send m
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00602.html (8,141 bytes)

244. Re: [TenTec] The QSK of SSB (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 17:46:15 -1000
Now that we've established that the vast majority of CW ops strongly prefer QSK under all operating circumstances, I have a question. Al, I don't believe that has been established. Do the vast majori
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00674.html (7,476 bytes)

245. Re: [TenTec] The QSK of SSB (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 08:37:24 -1000
ut ere are a ot of ahh hams who use ox, ahhh badly djusted :-) If the TX audio were digitized and then delayed, it would be possible for the VOX to turn on the transmitter after the beginning of a wo
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00710.html (9,314 bytes)

246. Re: [TenTec] RE: DIgital Signal Processing (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 09:30:18 -1000
I think that there are some reasonable and logical distinctions that can be made between digital control techniques and digital signal processing. Most production radios have been using digital techn
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00712.html (9,665 bytes)

247. Re: [TenTec] QSK (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 09:58:01 -1000
w8au@sssnet.com wrote: Someone asked "does DXing without using QSK make one a LID?" Well, in veiw of the following, I would say in some cases, yes. I LIKE TO SEND more than receive..... I do not like
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00715.html (9,283 bytes)

248. Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 10:56:09 -1000
Come on guys, you mean I should be able to hear a station calling someone else in between dits, AND know it's the DX not another station trying for him just like me? At least you should be able to te
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00720.html (7,339 bytes)

249. Re: [TenTec] QSK of QSK and QSK definition (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 16:18:26 -1000
The meaning of QSK as stated in the 1988 ARRL Handbook is: "Can you hear me between your signals and if so can I break in on your transmission? I can hear you between my signals; break in on my trans
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00737.html (10,461 bytes)

250. Re: [TenTec] QSK of QSK and QSK definition (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 21:24:10 -1000
Hi Bob, Okay, fine. I first experienced QSK with a Kenwood TS-440SAT. It was pretty good. I got spoiled and could not go back to slower "semi-breakin". I heard that Ten Tec had really good QSK, so I
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00749.html (9,721 bytes)

251. Re: [TenTec] QSK of QRP/QRO (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 08:17:33 -1000
I would like to see a contest scoring structure wherin each QSO is scored according to power level used. Perhaps three power levels and three different multipliers. The power levels would be >800, 20
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00783.html (10,478 bytes)

252. Re: [TenTec] Spare Tubes (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 09:02:32 -1000
Hi Jim, If I wanted to buy spare tubes for my Titan 425 (3CX800A7), where would I buy them and what's the "right" price? When I bought a used Titan 425, it came with a spare set of tubes. The seller
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00820.html (7,742 bytes)

253. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec amps and ALC (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 12:06:58 -1000
Why do Ten Tec rigs lack an ALC jack and why do Ten Tec amps lack an ALC input? I thought the the ALC connection on an amplifier was an OUTPUT. When the drive level to the amplifier approached an amo
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00826.html (8,655 bytes)

254. Re: [TenTec] re Ten Tec amps and ALC (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 12:13:08 -1000
Centurion/L4/2K/HF-2000/AL82/SB220 guys are vulnerable (did I leave anyone out? :). Drake L7 also uses a pair of 3-500Z cathode driven. Since you included the L4, I guess you get partial credit. DE N
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00827.html (7,354 bytes)

255. Re: TT RE: TT RE: [TenTec] Ten Tec amps and ALC (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 19:56:28 -1000
Tommy wrote: Your correct Al. My point is that just because an amp has a nice LED that's turned on by external-ALC, one should not get too comfortable that their amplifier is 'safe' from a poorly des
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00861.html (8,698 bytes)

256. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI locking up (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 20:20:28 -1000
What other methods (besides power cycling) unlock it? How about reducing the PWR control on the rig? Will that unlock it? That information would be one more clue as to what is happening. How are you
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00863.html (7,957 bytes)

257. Re: [TenTec] ORION QRQ tests (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 09:17:34 -1000
Thanks for the well described tests and results. As a non Orion owner, and perhaps a future Orion owner, I have a few questions and comments. Does Orion have a semi-breakin mode or some other less th
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00876.html (8,878 bytes)

258. Re: [TenTec] re Ten Tec amps and ALC (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 13:38:04 -1000
BTW, the amps made by specialty companies (Command for example) include ALC circuits, no doubt so they may be operated with the widest variety of rigs possible. Can anyone quote a manual from an ampl
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00890.html (8,784 bytes)

259. Re: [TenTec] ORION QRQ Performance (long) (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 13:42:24 -1000
Martin I think you are very probably correct but as my tests show Orion produces acceptable code up to 60 wpm, how much of a problem is this? Certainly for avid fans of 60+ wpm this is a problem but
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00891.html (8,731 bytes)

260. Re: [TenTec] QSK limits (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 08:33:30 -1000
Every rig design is different. Transceivers that operate QSK can only do so within certain limits. I think everyone expects that there are limits, and nobody should be surprised about this. It would
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00909.html (10,256 bytes)

Current List: 241 - 260
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu