Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:mark@microenh.com: 671 ]

Total 671 documents matching your query.

341. [TenTec] Continuing Orion Evaluation (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 11:15:32 -0400
Well, I've had my Orion since last Wednesday and I'm continuing the evaluation. I must say that the receive audio is a beauty to hear. I could listen to it all day. From what reports I've gotten, the
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00184.html (14,441 bytes)

342. Re: [TenTec] Re: Continuing Orion evaluation/Dragonball (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 22:48:55 -0400
I have owned both the Icom 756 and 756 Pro (which I sold in anticipation of the Orion). I found the spectrum display very usable in those radios. I did use it to scan a large section (the max sweep r
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00212.html (11,773 bytes)

343. Re: [TenTec] Re: Continuing Orion evaluation/Dragonball (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 07:45:48 -0400
There is a relatively new ( or at least now in vogue, I suspect good programmers have been using it for years, without realizing the new paradigm )method in software development "termed test driven d
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00218.html (11,430 bytes)

344. [TenTec] DVR on Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 07:54:03 -0400
Is anyone using the DVR on the Orion. I was trying to break a pileup last night, and I think I may have pushed the SEND 1 button before the previous send had completed, but twice the Orion lost main
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00307.html (7,284 bytes)

345. Re: [TenTec] RX-340 Mute (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 22:33:51 -0400
Alan, There is a mute input on pin 11 of the 15 pin D-Sub connector. Grounding it mutes the RX340. 73, Mark, N8ME -- Original Message -- From: "alan" <gi0otc@ntlworld.com> To: <tentec@contesting.com>
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00393.html (7,726 bytes)

346. Re: [TenTec] Using Omni VI with MMTTY on FSK (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 18:00:44 -0400
Jim, Are you using a USB / RS232 serial port converter on your computer? Sometimes those interfaces will work fine for switching PTT but not for sending data. Can you give some more details on the in
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00573.html (9,072 bytes)

347. Re: [TenTec] Using Omni VI with MMTTY on FSK (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 08:39:00 -0400
I'm using a Rascal Mark V RTTY interface (I just checked the website and I think it's now called the Mark V Plus). Is that what you have? The original Rascal (still sold as a kit) and the Mark V (w/
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00600.html (10,577 bytes)

348. [TenTec] SB220 and Omni VI (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 09:05:30 -0400
I've given in to the declining propagation and purchased my first amp. I picked up a nice Heathkit SB220 to help my Omni VI (opt 3). The SB220 has the Harbach SoftKey mod installed which I'm told all
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00601.html (7,425 bytes)

349. [TenTec] 6N2 questions (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 12:02:08 -0400
I recently purchased a used 6N2 (6m/2m all-mode). It had version 1.10 of the firmware and a note and upgrade chip that the previous owner had not installed. The version of the upgrade was 1.21. I con
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00011.html (8,885 bytes)

350. Re: [TenTec] 6N2 questions (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 20:00:33 -0400
Jerry, Thanks for the reply. If this is the case, is this a problem with my receiver or with the repeater? And, assuming I can't do anything about the repeater, what can I do about it? 73, Mark
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00041.html (8,524 bytes)

351. Re: [TenTec] 6N2 questions (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 21:38:29 -0400
Mike, I think you're right. I wonder if anything can be done with the 6N2? With this condition, it's not going to replace the 2m FM rig in the shack as I had hoped. Mark don't the
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00095.html (9,946 bytes)

352. Re: [TenTec] Pegasus AGC. (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 12:05:36 -0400
I just downloaded and scanned quickly through George's presentation. I don't see any mention of AGC. Also, this device looks at the transmitted signal. AGC only affects the received signal. As I unde
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00380.html (9,183 bytes)

353. Re: [TenTec] Pegasus AGC. (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 16:50:21 -0400
Dr. Lou, Thanks for the email. After looking at George's website, I was just about set to order the PSKMETER for my shack as I operate a lot of PSK. However, one of my rigs is a Pegasus and if the PS
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00387.html (11,395 bytes)

354. Re: [TenTec] Pegasus AGC. (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 19:13:05 -0400
Lou, Thanks for the info. I have heard that some soundcards have distortion in their outputs when the volumn control sliders are at the max. Perhaps your soundcard is like that. If the signal coming
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00391.html (10,657 bytes)

355. [TenTec] 5 mV = -67 dBm (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 17:40:04 -0400
According to the specs on my Pegasus, the microphone input is 5mV or -67 dBm. Could someone explain the relationship between mV and dBm? I just acquired a closeout Radio Shack mixer. The line output
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00684.html (8,031 bytes)

356. Re: [TenTec] 5 mV = -67 dBm (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 20:26:35 -0400
73, Mark voltage be
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00691.html (9,368 bytes)

357. Re: [TenTec] 5 mV = -67 dBm (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 07:01:40 -0400
George, Yes, I think you are right. If the mic input were rated 5 mV, it should be -46 dBv. But I did verify that the Pegasus manual says 5 mv or -67 dB. I wonder what reference point TT is using? vo
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00695.html (14,842 bytes)

358. Re: [TenTec] 5 mV = -67 dBm (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 19:15:14 -0400
I believe that on the Pegasus that the back panel input is the same level as the mic. Also, this was in the section of the manual talking about the mic input. Mark connector
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00738.html (9,798 bytes)

359. Re: [TenTec] Argosy 525 speaker FYI (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:08:04 -0400
Mike, So you have six Argosy's? Mark http://www.jameco.com/cgi-bin/ncommerce3/ProductDisplay?prmenbr=91&prrfnbr=2 505&cgrfnbr=817&ctgys=503;538;817; the
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00753.html (9,508 bytes)

360. Re: [TenTec] Some Observations on Orion Stability/Calibration (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark@microenh.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 08:50:12 -0400
When I first got into short wave listening in the late 60's / early 70's. WWV's broadcast cycle was 5 minutes. During part of that time I think they sent out information designed to allow receivers t
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00105.html (9,918 bytes)

Current List: 341 - 360
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu