Mail Archive Search: <+from:n0hs@swbell.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:n0hs@swbell.net: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Where is a good antenna reflector located? (score: 1): Author: n0hs@swbell.net (David Stanfield); Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 06:39:43 -0600; Thanks in advance for directions to a good antenna discussion group. Dave, N0HS -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/tentec Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-02/msg00002.html (6,719 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Calling Frequency 10.123 (score: 1): Author: n0hs@swbell.net (David Stanfield); Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2001 16:12:35 -0600; I have been using 10.123 as the calling frequency. There are so many options but I feel that this one gives the greatest coverage day and night so there is a better chance of connecting. So far I hav; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-02/msg00044.html (7,174 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Calling Frequency 10.123 (score: 1): Author: n0hs@swbell.net (David Stanfield); Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2001 20:15:14 -0600; Sorry about the earlier message. I will be out until Friday. I will be mobile tomarrow night about 9 pm CST and will give a try on 10.123 Tuesday night. Tnx Dave Stanfield N0HS --Original Message-- F; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-02/msg00060.html (7,560 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Tnx for the tunner advice (score: 1): Author: n0hs@swbell.net (David Stanfield); Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 07:50:58 -0600; A month or so ago there was a long discussion about balanced vs unbalanced. I had just bought a Titan and really wanted to run it on a balanced system due to my antenna space and operating needs (and; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-02/msg00262.html (7,153 bytes)
5. [TenTec] CW inactivity (score: 1): Author: n0hs@swbell.net (David Stanfield); Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 21:54:41 -0600; Times have changed but we don't have to go quietly or soon. Why don't we pick a freq. to monitor when we are in the shack doing something else. It could be an informal cw meeting place one band for d; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00279.html (11,547 bytes)
6. [TenTec] CQ TT CW CALLING FREQ - GREAT IDEA! (score: 1): Author: n0hs@swbell.net (David Stanfield); Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 07:28:35 -0600; 30 Meters may be the best all around (sort of range limited in the day) with plenty of open spaces, but do we want to stay off of WARC? If we do then maybe 40 at night and 20 day. Lets pick freqs wer; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00286.html (14,555 bytes)
7. [TenTec] Idea (score: 1): Author: n0hs@swbell.net (David Stanfield); Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 16:20:17 -0600; Was listening for you but could not hear. I am in Kansas City, Mo probably too far away for daylight ops maybe night will work. This maybe a bad night because of the contest though. --Original Messag; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00299.html (9,827 bytes)
8. [TenTec] CW Calling frequency (score: 1): Author: n0hs@swbell.net (David Stanfield); Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 07:12:22 -0600; I have been very busy with work and monitoring earth quake traffic and have been unable to keep up with the reflector as well as I should have so I might have missed the decision. If there has been n; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00416.html (6,904 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]