- 1. Re: [TenTec] OT: FCC to re-instate CW requirement for General and Extra (score: 1)
- Author: Doug Reid <n1068d@aol.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 08:18:43 -0400 (EDT)
- Had me happy and angry all at the same time ! Doug Reid WD4LNW http://ke2yk.wordpress.com/2014/03/28/fcc-to-reinstate-morse-code-requiremen / 73 - Rick, DJ0IP Nr. Frankfurt am Main) _________________
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00005.html (9,753 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TenTec] OT: FCC to re-instate CW requirement for General and Extra (score: 1)
- Author: Doug Reid <n1068d@aol.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 08:24:53 -0400 (EDT)
- I only operate CW these days. I tend to enjoy rag chewing with other cw op's and actually learning about their rigs, antennas, jobs and such. Funny how most of them are my age or older....60's plus.
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00006.html (10,249 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TenTec] Triton IV 540 Questions (score: 1)
- Author: Doug Reid <n1068d@aol.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 17:51:02 -0400 (EDT)
- Hi Wes : The elastic band has stretched to the point your dial pointer will not go all the way to the left of your dial. This is very common on those dial cord rigs and is why most of us always turn
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00363.html (9,296 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TenTec] mike (score: 1)
- Author: Doug Reid <n1068d@aol.com>
- Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 09:18:36 -0400 (EDT)
- Rodney, I read your posts but I am not really sure what you accomplished in your microphone test. Were you trying to find the mic that sounded the most like your natural voice, or were you going for
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00376.html (8,885 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TenTec] no email received. (score: 1)
- Author: Doug Reid <n1068d@aol.com>
- Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 09:19:50 -0400 (EDT)
- Test 1..2..3... Copy that ? WD4LNW I subscribe to QRP-L, Elecraft, and Ten Tec reflectors. Last email received from any of the three, was approx 11am, April 19, so I guess I have joined the group of
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00377.html (8,414 bytes)
- 6. Re: [TenTec] mike (score: 1)
- Author: Doug Reid <n1068d@aol.com>
- Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:59:22 -0400 (EDT)
- I agree with Bob's remarks. The two microphones use the same element, but achieve different results. Doug WD4LNW The configuration and not the element, i.e., mounting, vents, back loading nd such lar
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00383.html (13,026 bytes)
- 7. Re: [TenTec] mike (score: 1)
- Author: Doug Reid <n1068d@aol.com>
- Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 19:47:06 -0400 (EDT)
- Like I mentioned in an earlier post, there are many variables in choosing a mic to suit your needs. That is why I have about 2 dozen different microphones in my recording studio. Some voices sound gr
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00390.html (15,320 bytes)
- 8. Re: [TenTec] Before I call Ten Tec . . . (score: 1)
- Author: Doug Reid <n1068d@aol.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 09:32:06 -0500 (EST)
- Have you been to the Ten Tec website ? There are FAQ's about the Omni VI you might want to read. I would give their service dept a call. They will be glad to talk to you and might save you some time
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00038.html (11,741 bytes)
- 9. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
- Author: Doug Reid <n1068d@aol.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 11:13:41 -0500 (EST)
- I always hated buying a piece of used gear that the previous owner engraved his call letters into the back panel....a little red ink....easy enough to get off.... I always use permanent ink! I don't
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00056.html (12,649 bytes)
- 10. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
- Author: Doug Reid <n1068d@aol.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 12:04:44 -0500 (EST)
- Yeah...I even left a note for a theif enclosed..just in case he opened it up...not something I can disclose on a family friendly forum..hi hi . Yup, that was me... :-) Though I never engraved my call
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00059.html (13,085 bytes)
- 11. Re: [TenTec] QSK or not? (score: 1)
- Author: Doug Reid <n1068d@aol.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 09:14:49 -0400 (EDT)
- I have been following this thread for a while now, and I have a question. First, I do not own a modern hf rig, but do operate an old Triton 544 primarily on cw. In this rig, the relay, reed relay to
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00167.html (16,953 bytes)
- 12. Re: [TenTec] QSK or not? (score: 1)
- Author: Doug Reid <n1068d@aol.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 10:21:14 -0400 (EDT)
- Thanks Rick for the info. Being primarily a cw operator, I have several old rigs here, some are not full QSK. I never really minded that some incorporated a delay rather than full QSK on cw. It is of
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00169.html (25,084 bytes)
- 13. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II, PTO output level (score: 1)
- Author: Doug Reid <n1068d@aol.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 10:17:46 -0400 (EDT)
- If you don't mind my asking, what problem are you experiencing with your rig ? I spent a few hours last week resurrecting a Triton 544 PTO and associated problems with the VFO. Doug WD4LNW It was mea
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00212.html (8,493 bytes)
- 14. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II noise blanker (score: 1)
- Author: Doug Reid <n1068d@aol.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 09:01:52 -0400 (EDT)
- Have you confirmed that the newer board is a completely different design from your old board ? Are the components different ? I have an Argonaut 505 and the power amp board is a different number from
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00243.html (10,285 bytes)
- 15. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II noise blanker (score: 1)
- Author: Doug Reid <n1068d@aol.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 07:46:41 -0400 (EDT)
- The best noise blanker I've ever heard was in the Triton 544. It really works very well . Why anyone would change a good design is a mystery. Doug WD4LNW Sent from AOL Mobile Mail <div id="AOLMsgPart
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00250.html (12,560 bytes)
- 16. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II noise blanker (score: 1)
- Author: Doug Reid <n1068d@aol.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 13:01:00 -0400 (EDT)
- Good explanation ! Maybe they should have had several different stages built into the NB for different applications. They probably did just that. My Triton still works very well for most noise proble
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00257.html (11,440 bytes)
- 17. Re: [TenTec] TenTec Argonaut 509 (score: 1)
- Author: Doug Reid <n1068d@aol.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:59:12 -0500 (EST)
- Hi Jim: I have always enjoyed the challenge of qrp. Back in the 1980's, I converted an 11m meter ssb rig to 10 meters. I would routinely work contacts in Australia as I drove to work. I look forward
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00132.html (7,689 bytes)
- 18. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
- Author: Doug Reid <n1068d@aol.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 09:07:37 -0500 (EST)
- I recently got back into ham radio after being away for about 20 years . I have been licensed since the early 1970's and really enjoyed all the old gear back then. My first receiver was a Hallicaraft
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00280.html (11,778 bytes)
- 19. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
- Author: Doug Reid <n1068d@aol.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 13:30:25 -0500 (EST)
- Back when I started out, we used a spark generator and the frequency was determined by the length of our antenna......not really.....geez, how old do you guys think am I anyway ! Although, I did hear
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00290.html (16,357 bytes)
- 20. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
- Author: Doug Reid <n1068d@aol.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 15:39:54 -0500 (EST)
- You guys are a hoot ! I resemble that remark about me and my old pal Mahion Loomas ! Doug, I think you've been hanging out with Mahlon Loomas too long! And for those of you who can't remember who he
- /archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00295.html (12,393 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu