I purchased a like-new Scout several years ago, and the Jones filter never seemed to work very well - poor selectivity, CF too high, etc. I sent it back to TenTec, and they replaced the radio's micro
Paul, I have installed the two 400Hz Inrad filters (#750/#759), in addition to the 600Hz roofing filter (#763) and board. I can tell you from my perspective, after replacing the TT 2x500 and 2x250 fi
Doc, In talking with Inrad at Dayton, I got the feeling that if 10 or so buyers committed to purchasing the 1000Hz filter for the 6.3mHz IF, that they would make them. I don't know if there are 9 oth
Jerry, Taking your point regarding filter response shape (ideally, rounded edges, steep slopes, and flat passband), and looking at the response curves for the Inrad CW filters, they look pretty incre
Larry, To get the total value of this modification requires the purchase of both 2.8kHz SSB filters (#754 & #755), plus the audio mod kit. Having installed both filters and the audio kit, the result
Hi Adam, Perhaps you can enlighten me a bit on our neighbors to the North. Why is it that the Canadian amateurs are carrying on SSB QSO's in the traditionally CW bands on 40M? I am speaking of the QR
Thanks Tom, Yes, I understand about the jurisdiction issues. But, it's the gentleman's agreement that has apparently broken down. This was not a problem four/five years ago, and has gotten steadily w
Thanks Ron - I think I get it now..... That's easy. The FCC band segments only apply to amateurs under FCC jurisdiction... which Canada (and the rest of the world) is not. So why do Canadians operate