Wouldn't it be a nice firmware enhancement to offer additional "modes" that provide for sharper filter skirts, even if it means not using QSK in those instances? There are times where fast RX/TX swit
But wait there's more that need specific mention: Sub/dual RX operation with RX-320 or with another Pegasus/Jupiter, or RX331/340. Fun and powerful spectrum sweep/tuning features when used in a dual
I didn't get the impression at all that the main Orion RX is going to be crystal filter based, at least not in the sense that the Omni VI et al have been.
I couldn't agree more. I completely agree with these remarks too, so much of what software define radios and software control can give us is simply not being recognized by hams in general. When build
No apologies needed. Actually all this speculation and its associated debate is fun and I believe serves as a useful feedback mechanism to the folks at Ten Tec who I'm sure watch this reflector quite
Wow, wasn?t expecting this to turn into a reverse engineering exercise but here?s a bit more from me. For what it?s worth though I suspect little if any of the actual circuits of the RX-340, Pegasus
I seriously doubt it. I'm sure the "RF Squared" moniker is nothing more than marketing, it is simply establishing a "brand" for the single point download source web site. As such it is an excellent i
Yes these tones are present, I see (and hear) them in both of my Peg?s, no discernable different between the two radios. I?m told that they exist in Jupiter?s too. Interestingly though I have never f
I found the comments about versions "1.4" vs. "1.5" interesting. Initially those version numbers threw me for bit of a loop, but I believe they are actually 1.140 and 1.150 respectively as diplayed i
Along with the new firmware for the Jupiter Ten Tec has also posted a new DSP firmware for the Pegasus at: http://www.tentec.com/rfsquared/pegasus/PegasusMain.htm I've downloaded it and put it throug
I would definitely love to see two separate versions made available, one with the traditional front panel and one without. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE
I also agree that the all in one boxes come up short, but for an additional reason. They don't do you a lot of good if you need (Ok want)to monitor several VHF/UHF bands simultaneously. Their economi
I'm not sure that all of the details are already cast in stone (or is that silicon?) so some "should we include it" or not kinds of decisions for little feature niceties may still yet to be made. How
I really don't think it is so much a matter of having to expect that they have made compromises but is instead an observation of what is out there currently. In order to put all those bands into one
Please see my comments in line below: <snip> I want the ability to monitor (both audibly and visually) 4 or more bands all at once, and to work with them completely independently of each other. <snip
Bob K4TAX: For what it's worth, I would like to see a rig that is mildly computer controlled. I don't want a computer than has a rig attached. Why constrict the computer control capabilities? There?s
Bob, My response to your post was to try and generate some spirited debate and perhaps provide some food for thought, reviewing it though I can see that it may have come across a bit adversarial and
?They have an excellent handle on DSP filtering from their learned experiences with the RX-331, RX-340, RX-320, Pegasus and Jupiter...so no lengthy time design here. I suspect what we'll see will be
It was interesting how what had started out as a simple question about frequency stability evolved into a discussion about manufacturing economics. Well now I can?t help but weigh in with some though
Is it just me or does anyone else get the impression that there is a growing tendency for all of the major amateur radio makers to publicize upcoming new models many months before they will be availa