Mail Archive Search: <+from:n9dg@yahoo.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:n9dg@yahoo.com: 406 ]

Total 406 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [TenTec] Argosy 1: birdy (score: 1): Author: Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 19:30:03 -0700 (PDT); ???? What 5 MHz circuit in the Orion???? My understanding of the Orion schematic is that the UHF "synthesizer" is divided down to ~10-~39 Mhz for the 1st LO, there isn't any 5-5.5 MHz circuit anywher; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-06/msg00367.html (7,743 bytes)
62. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Omni D Model 546 vs Delta 580? (score: 1): Author: Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 18:27:26 -0700 (PDT); I don't have an Omni D but do have a 580 Delta. One thing that the 580 can do that the Omni D (non series C) can't is 17M. Though you can run the Omni D series C on 17M you really don't want to. The; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-05/msg00801.html (9,135 bytes)
63. Re: [TenTec] omni d series c display problem (score: 1): Author: Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 06:44:01 -0700 (PDT); I don't have a Omni C here but those symptoms sound identical to what happens with a Corsair when the VFO In/Out jumper on the radio's back panel is either missing or is intermittent. Duane N9DG ____; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00357.html (9,554 bytes)
64. Re: [TenTec] Orion vs SDR-1000 (score: 1): Author: Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 07:20:04 -0700 (PDT); Absolutely. Hopefully the Pegasus II will be similar to the SDR-1000 :). No doubt that it's the first of a truly new breed. Since it is so new it is roughly comparable to what the Triton I, SS200, SB; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00823.html (8,995 bytes)
65. Re: [TenTec] Pegasus / Softrock 5 (score: 1): Author: Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 18:43:09 -0800 (PST); I've thought about variations of this idea and even done some basic RX experiments with it. My most serious experiments to date using this basic idea were over a year ago using a Corsair II as the tu; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00841.html (10,471 bytes)
66. Re: [TenTec] Pegasus / Softrock 5 (score: 1): Author: Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2006 07:14:26 -0800 (PST); Note that posting was before I had used the Time Machine board. Even so the results were almost the same whether I used the SDR-1000 as the IF or the Time Machine board. So I have very little doubt t; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00921.html (9,593 bytes)
67. Re: [TenTec] Serial numbers (score: 1): Author: Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 16:43:02 -0800 (PST); As far as I know the early ##-## S/N format is simply sequential. I'm not aware of any public listing that equates specific S/N's to dates either. So then it's a matter of looking inside the radio it; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01113.html (8,119 bytes)
68. Re: [TenTec] Orion & SDR1000 thoughts (score: 1): Author: Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 20:05:33 -0800 (PST); Just sitting here restraining my fingers from typing a whole lot more ;). Much of this excellent post does sound kinda familar though...:)... Duane N9DG ______________________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01337.html (8,811 bytes)
69. Re: [TenTec] Orion & SDR1000 thoughts - additional RX's (score: 1): Author: Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 20:14:56 -0800 (PST); <snip> Just to clarify: The upcoming aditional RX's for SDR-1000 will be software only implementations and be identical in performance to the 1st. No new or additional hardware will be required. So t; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01338.html (9,225 bytes)
70. Re: [TenTec] S-meter and RF Gain (score: 1): Author: Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 11:36:07 -0800 (PST); Sounds to me like another example of something that should in reality be a user settable choice in the setup menu somewhere. It really shouldn't have to be just one way *or* the other, this is a soft; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00285.html (10,513 bytes)
71. Re: [TenTec] Pegasus xmit problem (score: 1): Author: Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 17:49:13 -0800 (PST); Rich, I'd be suspect of a couple things: 1. Output transistors have gone bad, would be a bit surprising for a radio that was just sitting though. The main clue to look for for this type of failure is; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00910.html (11,097 bytes)
72. Re: [TenTec] Argo V and 6&2 Question (score: 1): Author: Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 19:30:39 -0800 (PST); The little bit I tried to use RF sensed keying here it drove me nuts. If you set the hang time long enough for it to not drop out between words on SSB or slow CW it would take it forever to turn arou; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00941.html (9,210 bytes)
73. Re: [TenTec] RX-320 (score: 1): Author: Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 18:25:29 -0800 (PST); The "D" model adds a 12kHz IF out jack for outboard signal processing, it's generally targeted toward DRM broadcast decoders though other uses are certainly viable. The other notable change is that t; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00203.html (9,333 bytes)
74. Re: [TenTec] OMNI V Question (vs. Corsair II & TS-830s) (score: 1): Author: Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 07:58:37 -0800 (PST); The Corsair's second IF could be loaded with filters just like the Omni V. It does only have the single 2.4kHz wide 9MHz in the first IF though. just Yes the Corsairs are audio based AGC. Looking at; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00382.html (8,685 bytes)
75. Re: [TenTec] keying the Omni D with a modern PIC keyer (score: 1): Author: Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 17:11:57 -0800 (PST); a Bugs, and keyers for sending CW??? - that's *cheating*. If anyone really wants to truly claim a mastery of the CW art then they should really be using nothing but a straight key. As for computers??; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00396.html (8,244 bytes)
76. Re: [TenTec] What's going on with the O2? (score: 1): Author: Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 11:30:34 -0700 (PDT); Bingo! And that's exactly why I have bought an SDR-1000... Even with its perpetual state of software flux it is already more "right" for me than anything else out there. And it's only going to get be; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-10/msg00267.html (9,168 bytes)
77. Re: [TenTec] What's going on with the O2? (score: 1): Author: Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 19:18:48 -0700 (PDT); Depends. If your desires and needs are only for a radio that is mostly traditional in how you use it and interface with it as a user then yes the Orion will hold its "value" and practicality just fin; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-10/msg00296.html (11,986 bytes)
78. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec analyzer (score: 1): Author: Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 08:27:17 -0700 (PDT); I'm pretty sure (99%) that the connectors are SMA's I've also looked at the VNA as a possible signal generator source as well. If I recall correctly it should be able to output RF to ~100 MHz @ ~0dBm; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-09/msg00444.html (8,929 bytes)
79. Re: [TenTec] ten tec transverters (score: 1): Author: Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 19:58:55 -0700 (PDT); I aggree with Bob. The DEMI transverters are about the best "bang for the buck" transverters out there. And I'd keep the Omni D to use as the IF radio for driving the transverter as well. I suspect t; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00477.html (9,952 bytes)
80. Re: [TenTec] ten tec transverters (score: 1): Author: Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 14:24:11 -0700 (PDT); The Elecraft transverters I'm sure perform very well, they also use a 17dBm mixer like the DEMI units do. And also like the DEMI units they use a very low noise device for the RX RF amplifier stage (; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00484.html (11,139 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]