Mail Archive Search: <+from:patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk>

Results:

References: [ +from:patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk: 112 ]

Total 112 documents matching your query.

81. [TenTec] serial interface to Omni V (score: 1): Author: patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk (patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk); Date: Tue, 09 Mar 1999 20:34:16 -0000 (GMT); The port certainly works - I use it every day in conjunction with a logging programme. I am a beta tester for the HYPERLOG PROFESSIONAL programme which at least in part supports the Omni-V odd-ball i; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-03/msg00126.html (11,001 bytes)
82. [TenTec] serial interface to Omni V (score: 1): Author: patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk (patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk); Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 00:12:20 -0000 (GMT); Thanks for sight of Paul Smith's code for controlling the Omni-V. This is exactly the software I saw sometime ago on a shareware disk. was released with a more conventional RS232 interface. The OMNIV; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-03/msg00140.html (12,262 bytes)
83. [TenTec] MIKE FOR OMNI-D (score: 1): Author: patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk (patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk); Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 20:39:21 -0000 (GMT); I have a Shure 444 - its wired for my TR-7 and it did a good job. Does it have enough output for the Omni-V ?? I have tried a Heil insert - it got good reports but needs the mike gain set to the top; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-03/msg00252.html (10,418 bytes)
84. [TenTec] person I connected for ride to Dayton (score: 1): Author: patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk (patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk); Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 18:07:31 -0000 (GMT); No problemo Scott ! Bob K3SRO and I are all set to arrive in the Dayton area late PM of May 12, but we are in accommodations a little further out, in Lebanon (OH, not OD5). Thats about 20-25 minutes; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-03/msg00289.html (12,309 bytes)
85. [TenTec] any way to RIT a V (score: 1): Author: patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk (patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk); Date: Sun, 07 Feb 1999 20:46:55 -0000 (GMT); Well, we might meet up sooner than you think - I'm in the middle of arranging a visit to the '99 Dayton Hamvention. Now that would be a good time to get a heap of TenTec users together to compare not; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-02/msg00066.html (9,315 bytes)
86. [TenTec] Omni D TVI problems (score: 1): Author: patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk (patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk); Date: Tue, 09 Feb 1999 22:15:28 -0000 (GMT); Hi Jason; some ideas for you to kick around with local hams who may have had the same problem. It depends on how the TV signal reaches the TV sets - are they on a common antenna system, or are they o; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-02/msg00097.html (12,315 bytes)
87. [TenTec] Omni D TVI problems (score: 1): Author: patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk (patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk); Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1999 11:00:10 -0000 (GMT); I may have partly answered this in my response to Jason. Your neighbor plainly has a problem - and its not you. A half decent antenna should fix his situation, but it might be tactically necessary to; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-02/msg00108.html (11,749 bytes)
88. [TenTec] filters (score: 1): Author: patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk (patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk); Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1999 11:00:20 -0000 (GMT); Scott; you do not need to take the bottom off, unless you need to change a filter. The right hand filter button is the "narrow" option for the 9 mHz IF on the Omni-V. Hit the narrow button and tune t; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-02/msg00109.html (10,684 bytes)
89. [TenTec] Inrad 2.8K (score: 1): Author: patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk (patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk); Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1999 11:00:24 -0000 (GMT); Its impossible to comment in depth when the INRAD web site does not give any specification for their TenTec filters. We need to know how many poles, the -60dB bandwidth, (for the shape factor) and pr; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-02/msg00110.html (10,852 bytes)
90. [TenTec] Inrad 2.8K (score: 1): Author: patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk (patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk); Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 00:01:24 -0000 (GMT); Thanks for the info Carl, but its a very long haul (expensive) phone call from here (until I get Internet telephone working). I already e-mailed INRAD and got enough data to make a snap decision. Now; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-02/msg00123.html (10,872 bytes)
91. [TenTec] Service manuals revisited... (score: 1): Author: patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk (patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk); Date: Sat, 13 Feb 1999 11:01:14 -0000 (GMT); As I'm even further out in the boondocks than most, info on re-aligning my elderly Omni-V would be very welcome. I have, or can borrow excellent test gear, but its good to have some idea what to adju; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-02/msg00176.html (11,315 bytes)
92. [TenTec] FILTER CHATTER (score: 1): Author: patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk (patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk); Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 18:56:06 -0000 (GMT); I also now have an MFJ DSP box to test. Its specs are excellent but I guess it will also add its own noise level. The bottom line is that these box are clever but they are at least as expensive as a; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-02/msg00219.html (10,337 bytes)
93. [TenTec] TenTec Hercules II for sale (score: 1): Author: patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk (patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk); Date: Sat, 20 Feb 1999 02:45:34 -0000 (GMT); I have to agree that the Hercules II is an excellent amplifier. I have been using one for several years now and its just like having a 500w (output) tranceiver when its hooked to my Omni-V. I can get; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-02/msg00228.html (11,036 bytes)
94. [TenTec] RE: Your idea about testing a relay in-operation. (score: 1): Author: patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk (patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk); Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 10:11:29 -0000 (GMT); Thanks Web - I have now tried the idea and it works. As you remember my Hercules II was intermittently producing no RF output, only a high SWR, so I needed to find out if the vacuum relay coil was ge; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-02/msg00259.html (10,343 bytes)
95. [TenTec] vacuum relays ....revisited (score: 1): Author: patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk (patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk); Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 21:01:54 -0000 (GMT); Thanks to all those who took time to offer suggestions and advice. Picking things up in no special order - (i) the Herc II has to key up in around 5 ms. On published specs that rules out open frame r; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-02/msg00275.html (9,280 bytes)
96. [TenTec] RE: Sticking Vacuum Relay - Temporary Repair (score: 1): Author: patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk (patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk); Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 15:19:50 -0000 (GMT); Thank you Dave !! Now thats the kind of affordable fix I needed to know about. Incidentally, whatever is up with my Herc II relay, its not stuck all the time. It will work OK for quite a while before; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-02/msg00297.html (10,453 bytes)
97. [TenTec] RE: TT auto-atu 253 memory chip (score: 1): Author: patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk (patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk); Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 23:17:57 -0000 (GMT); Yes, the 253 memory chip times out after around 100k operations.... Symptoms - the atu develops amnesia no matter what you do by way of resetting the roller coaster. In my case I had been using the t; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00249.html (8,282 bytes)
98. [TenTec] Tuner types and efficiency (score: 1): Author: patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk (patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk); Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 14:00:37 -0000 (GMT); I agree entirely. I used a massive home brew "ultimate transmatch" for several years before I got my TenTec 253, which uses the same basic L-match configuration as in the 238 (which I could not get o; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00437.html (10,933 bytes)
99. [TenTec] OMNI V J310's (score: 1): Author: patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk (patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk); Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 14:34:04 -0000 (GMT); I'm intrigued by your query about the OMNI-V J310's. I have an OMNI-V and its now quite ancient. Are there any symptoms associated with J310 ageing ?? I feel, but cannot verify, that I've recently be; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00438.html (10,588 bytes)
100. [TenTec] OMNI V J310's (score: 1): Author: patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk (patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk); Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 11:04:32 -0000 (GMT); Thanks Steve & Jerry ! Two points:- (i) if the J-310s feel warm (= hot ?) after some period of use, then perhaps its time to fit clip-on heat sinks ?? The one(s) with lowest internal R will presumabl; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00451.html (16,442 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 100
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]