Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:rick@rickdenney.com: 108 ]

Total 108 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [TenTec] Model Names (score: 1)
Author: Rick Denney <rick@rickdenney.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 18:55:02 -0500
Bob Cunnings writes... Makes me long for the Poseidon, rather than his sons. On the other hand, the Jupiter is named for the Roman god that is Zues to the ancient Greeks, equal to and slightly greate
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-01/msg00059.html (8,864 bytes)

82. [TenTec] RFI from USB-to-serial adaptor cable (score: 1)
Author: Rick Denney <rick@rickdenney.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 20:05:55 -0500
Folks, As it turns out, I'm getting significant RFI from the USB-to-RS232 cable I'm using to run my RX-320. The cable clearly has some circuitry in it, though it must be hiding in the molded plugs. I
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-01/msg00110.html (9,496 bytes)

83. Re: [TenTec] RFI from USB-to-serial adaptor cable (score: 1)
Author: Rick Denney <rick@rickdenney.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 22:48:54 -0500
d.e.warnick@comcast.net writes... Dave and Kirk, thanks for the information. I like both the multiple ports and the price. I have built many systems for work that used the old Digiboards, so the pric
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-01/msg00113.html (8,879 bytes)

84. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec commitment to customers... (score: 1)
Author: Rick Denney <rick@rickdenney.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:41:52 -0500
K5XS@aol.com writes... Me, too. As someone who has led major software development efforts, and who has written commercial software and owned a small company (me) devoted to same, I can offer a couple
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00528.html (13,216 bytes)

85. [TenTec] Basic advice on dual receive (score: 1)
Author: Rick Denney <rick@rickdenney.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 23:38:55 -0500
I'm facing a couple of weeks of enforced downtime following surgery in a couple of days, and I've decided it's time to get my dual receive capability working. I have an Omni V.9 for which I have not
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00591.html (8,197 bytes)

86. [TenTec] Omni V.9 and RX-320 sub-receiver working fine (score: 1)
Author: Rick Denney <rick@rickdenney.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 21:50:53 -0500
Thanks to those who sent details for incorporating my RX-320 as a sub-receiver for my Omni V.9. The 320 is working happily running through a USB to RS-232 adaptor from my station laptop, leaving the
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00785.html (9,983 bytes)

87. Re: [TenTec] Identify 9Mhz OMNI VI+ Filters (score: 1)
Author: Rick Denney <rick@rickdenney.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 17:08:14 -0500
Dennis Ashworth writes... You suspect correctly: It's a 2400 Hz filter for 9 MHz. 1800 Hz filter for 9 Mhz. 500 Hz filter for 9 MHz. The Ten Tec Wiki is your friend when identifying Ten Tec products.
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-12/msg00848.html (8,132 bytes)

88. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II PTO Problems (score: 1)
Author: Rick Denney <rick@rickdenney.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:43:58 -0500
hamradio@twcny.rr.com writes... The Paragon, which was Ten Tec's first general-coverage receiver. The Omni V appear a year or two later, with a ham-bands-only receiver. Both used digitally synthesize
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00565.html (10,150 bytes)

89. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II PTO Problems (score: 1)
Author: Rick Denney <rick@rickdenney.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:53:06 -0500
w8au@sssnet.com writes... My digging around in the wiki reveals that the Paragon was 1987 and the Omni V was 1989. The Paragon was reviewed in 1988, and the Omni V in 1990, in QST. The first Paragon
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00571.html (10,010 bytes)

90. [TenTec] Audio quality issue in Heil headset with Omni V (score: 1)
Author: rick denney <rick@rickdenney.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 00:46:23 -0400
As I have worked through integration issues with my new (to me) Omni V, I'm finally ready to try and understand an issue I've had all along. In my Heil Pro Set headset, the sound from the headphone o
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-10/msg00270.html (9,410 bytes)

91. Re: [TenTec] Audio quality issue in Heil headset with Omni V (score: 1)
Author: rickdenney <rick@rickdenney.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 12:54:55 -0400
Barry N1EU writes... Thanks for the replies so far. The questions led me to observe more carefully. The problem only occurs on the monitor, not on signals being received over the air. That opens the
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-10/msg00326.html (8,539 bytes)

92. Re: [TenTec] Any Feedback? INRAD Roofing Filter Mod (score: 1)
Author: Rick Denney <rick@rickdenney.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 12:10:42 -0400
k1zn@cox.net writes... Other responses I've read have focused on CW performance, so I'll mention the SSB-size roofing filter. I have the INRAD roofing filter kit on my Omni V (it was a kit for an Omn
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-10/msg00430.html (8,070 bytes)

93. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI and non TT Amp (score: 1)
Author: Rick Denney <rick@rickdenney.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:04:43 -0400
Gary Hoffman writes... Okay, let me check my method with you guys, since I'm relatively new, particularly to amp usage. I have an Omni V and an 811A. I use the relay output of the 811, but I did not
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-10/msg00584.html (11,505 bytes)

94. Re: [TenTec] paragon II performance on longwave band?? (score: 1)
Author: Rick Denney <rick@rickdenney.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 13:18:39 -0400
john ferro writes... My Ten Tec is ham bands only, so it really doesn't hear well at frequencies below the AM BC band, heh, heh. But I know that a lot of general coverage receivers for ham radios hav
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-09/msg00423.html (9,090 bytes)

95. Re: [TenTec] ten tecs have 100 watts out on carrier?? (score: 1)
Author: Rick Denney <rick@rickdenney.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 12:26:09 -0400
john ferro writes... I suppose the newer Japanese radios use lower tuning outputs so that their inductor and capacitor switching relays in their internal ATUs don't get too much "exercise". But for t
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-09/msg00458.html (10,101 bytes)

96. Re: [TenTec] re Price increases (score: 1)
Author: Rick Denney <rick@rickdenney.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 14:50:08 -0400
Rob Atkinson, K5UJ writes... To Ameritron, it's worth $360 bucks for a QSK-5PCI installed in an 82. And then another hundred bucks for a cheapie power meter (not LED, of course). Rick, KR9D -- Richar
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-08/msg00056.html (8,897 bytes)

97. [TenTec] AL-811 amp integration with Omni V (score: 1)
Author: Rick Denney <rick@rickdenney.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 14:59:55 -0400
Since the subject of amps came up, and since I finally had an evening where I could play radio and set up my new (to me) Omni V, I have a question. It would appear that the Omni V uses a pair of RCA
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-08/msg00058.html (9,375 bytes)

98. Re: [TenTec] AL-811 amp integration with Omni V (score: 1)
Author: rickdenney <rick@rickdenney.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 22:28:35 -0400
OTAKEBI@aol.com writes... Thanks to all. I believe the relay is operational--I hear it clicking, though it makes so little noise that I wonder that it bothered anyone. But I'll pull the covers again
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-08/msg00066.html (9,114 bytes)

99. Re: [TenTec] AL-811 amp integration with Omni V (score: 1)
Author: Rick Denney <rick@rickdenney.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 20:32:27 -0400
I wrote... What I was hearing was not the relay clicking, but the relay *trying* to click. Upon closer inspection, I pulled out my tweezers and extracted a small piece of folded paper someone had stu
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-08/msg00097.html (10,346 bytes)

100. Re: [TenTec] AL-811 amp integration with Omni V (score: 1)
Author: Rick Denney <rick@rickdenney.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 23:04:11 -0400
k8vf_mark@centurytel.net writes... I certainly can't complain about the documentation of this radio. Except for the slip of paper, every change has been meticulously recorded. In fact, the handwritte
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-08/msg00123.html (8,100 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu