Mail Archive Search: <+from:royanjoy@ncn.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:royanjoy@ncn.net: 296 ]

Total 296 documents matching your query.

81. [TenTec] Re: Insulators (score: 1): Author: royanjoy@ncn.net (Roy Koeppe); Date: Fri, 6 Aug 1999 17:02:28 -0500; "Howdy gang. I need some information on where to get some strain insulators for 3/16 inch guy cable. Anyone know a source. Thanks Ed" Perhaps this would be more appropriate on the Antennas Reflector,; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-08/msg00118.html (6,792 bytes)
82. [TenTec] Re: Alternate Power Switching (score: 1): Author: royanjoy@ncn.net (Roy Koeppe); Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 14:31:15 -0500; This concerns (loosely): Hi, Gentlemen: I've just purchased a battery system to serve as backup to my Ten-Tec station. Power from either the power supply or the batteries would be switched with a SPD; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-08/msg00174.html (9,154 bytes)
83. [TenTec] Re: Alternate Power Switching (score: 1): Author: royanjoy@ncn.net (Roy Koeppe); Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 17:32:13 -0500; "But if it was my FET regulated linear supply it runs about 85% at 20 amps load... Unlike Astrons and the like at under 50% efficiency..." But the effective duty cycle is real low figuring receiving; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-08/msg00186.html (8,677 bytes)
84. [TenTec] Re: Alternate Power Switching (score: 1): Author: royanjoy@ncn.net (Roy Koeppe); Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 17:49:33 -0500; Jerry remarked: "Because of transformer and bleeder resistor looses, efficiency while receiving is even poorer, and with receive time much longer than transmit, the overall energy consumption is stil; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-08/msg00188.html (8,108 bytes)
85. [TenTec] Re: Alternate Power Switching (score: 1): Author: royanjoy@ncn.net (Roy Koeppe); Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1999 15:57:50 -0500; "......... OK All you guys who are experimenting with burning your houses down, PLEASE STOP IT............etc, etc....... Did you remember to take your medicine today, OM? Roy -- FAQ on WWW: http://w; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-08/msg00238.html (7,808 bytes)
86. [TenTec] Re: Dead List--Jim (score: 1): Author: royanjoy@ncn.net (Roy Koeppe); Date: Sun, 29 Aug 1999 10:08:43 -0500; Jim, Spend $10 on a Radar Shack VOM and find your own 'shorts'. How elementary, Watson! 73, Roy K6XK "Cost of the parts: $6.00; Labor, $37.50; shipping back to Kauai, $44.75, which is about what it c; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-08/msg00397.html (6,889 bytes)
87. [TenTec] Re: Ten-Tec & Headphones (score: 1): Author: royanjoy@ncn.net (Roy Koeppe); Date: Thu, 1 Jul 1999 08:22:24 -0500; Hello all, about... "Hi I have a Tentec Delta II. I have tried a few headsets. The volume level does not appear to be high enough. Any suggestions? -- Thank You, Bob Ferrey Jr. N3DOK" Most modern ham; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00010.html (7,602 bytes)
88. [TenTec] Re: TT & Headphones Volume (score: 1): Author: royanjoy@ncn.net (Roy Koeppe); Date: Thu, 1 Jul 1999 15:25:43 -0500; "I'm not sure I understand this. If the audio amp has an 8 ohm impedance output and we put a 100 ohm resistor in series with it, why would 2000 ohm headphones work unless they are just more sensitive; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00019.html (8,260 bytes)
89. [TenTec] Re: TT & Headphone Volume (score: 1): Author: royanjoy@ncn.net (Roy Koeppe); Date: Thu, 1 Jul 1999 15:45:20 -0500; About, "Why not make RF amps this way? Then we could through away our tuners. N4LQ" Hi, I think that TT RF power amps are pretty close to this, actually! Remember the warnings in TT manuals about TWO; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00021.html (7,045 bytes)
90. [TenTec] Re: INRAD in OMNI-6+ (score: 1): Author: royanjoy@ncn.net (Roy Koeppe); Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 10:14:07 -0500; About... "Hi All, I installed the INRAD 2.4khz 10 pole filter in the standard first (non-switched) 9 Mhz position, replacing the Ten Tec 2.4khz filter. I find that the INRAD filter has less loss than; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00054.html (7,267 bytes)
91. [TenTec] Re: INRAD 2.4 in OMNI (score: 1): Author: royanjoy@ncn.net (Roy Koeppe); Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 10:27:12 -0500; "But, wait, just realized my set up is different, or at least Barry's is different from what I thought George at INRAD had in mind. Barry said he put the new 10 pole, 2.4 kHz filter there!! That..."; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00055.html (6,906 bytes)
92. [TenTec] Re: AGC Survey (score: 1): Author: royanjoy@ncn.net (Roy Koeppe); Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 14:55:10 -0500; My operation includes lots of big round table QSK rag chews (with plenty controversial topics). So wee little signals are often mixed in with power houses. The only way to contend with copying both w; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00063.html (6,817 bytes)
93. [TenTec] Re: AGC Survey (Ken) (score: 1): Author: royanjoy@ncn.net (Roy Koeppe); Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 17:37:39 -0500; Hi Ken, No, unfortunately I seem to be among the last of the Mohicans that rag chew low bands out of Iowa. But then I'm on in the early mornings and don't know what's happening in the evenings much.; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00067.html (6,965 bytes)
94. [TenTec] Re: TT AGC Survey (Joe) (score: 1): Author: royanjoy@ncn.net (Roy Koeppe); Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 17:44:38 -0500; "Hi Roy, you don't need a mike with a Ten-Tec rig. What's your rag chew freq anyway, would like to join in." Joe! You're more than welcome! One of the main hangouts is 7020.28 beginning at around 053; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00068.html (6,894 bytes)
95. [TenTec] Re: (Jim) OMNI-6+ Stuff (score: 1): Author: royanjoy@ncn.net (Roy Koeppe); Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 09:26:53 -0500; "(DSP + audio peak) ON." What audio peak? 73, Roy K6XK -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00291.html (6,900 bytes)
96. [TenTec] Re: OMNI-6+ noise (score: 1): Author: royanjoy@ncn.net (Roy Koeppe); Date: Sun, 25 Jul 1999 16:46:55 -0500; "I find a low pass filter on the speaker line cures any receiver's high frequency bleed through. There was one published in QST a year or two ago. Mine uses a 70 volt to voice transformer to raise th; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00333.html (7,649 bytes)
97. [TenTec] Re: WTB FM Board (score: 1): Author: royanjoy@ncn.net (Roy Koeppe); Date: Mon, 26 Jul 1999 15:19:35 -0500; "I'm looking for a Model 256 FM board for an Omni V. If you have one you don't need let me know." You have ESP? Roy -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesti; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00348.html (6,639 bytes)
98. [TenTec] Re: How's the New Vibro... (score: 1): Author: royanjoy@ncn.net (Roy Koeppe); Date: Fri, 4 Jun 1999 15:07:17 -0500; Puck, Nice Freudian slip! 73, Roy K6XK -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owne; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-06/msg00044.html (7,678 bytes)
99. [TenTec] Re: OMNI-V S-meter (score: 1): Author: royanjoy@ncn.net (Roy Koeppe); Date: Sat, 5 Jun 1999 17:34:06 -0500; Howdy, This might get more responses started. I traded my V in several years ago, but I think the offset pot was for calibrating the meter around the middle of its scale, S-5 or so. The main calibrat; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-06/msg00060.html (7,760 bytes)
100. [TenTec] Re: OMNI-V S-meter (score: 1): Author: royanjoy@ncn.net (Roy Koeppe); Date: Mon, 7 Jun 1999 17:18:50 -0500; Hi Curt; you axed, "Roy, I have a V... wonder how I get a hold of one of these Mod kits? And can you tell me how they are called out? It would be good to be able to reduce a little of this hiss and Q; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-06/msg00079.html (7,469 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 100
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15]